Free West Virginia Security Deposit Itemization

▶ Watch the walk-through

West Virginia Security Deposit Itemization — Step-by-Step Guide

▶

Covers the notice-period statement deadline, permitted deductions versus wear and tear, the one-year record-keeping duty, and the one-and-one-half-times bad-faith penalty

A West Virginia security deposit itemization is the line-by-line accounting a landlord must produce whenever any portion of a tenant’s deposit is kept back. It is not a friendly cover note and it is not optional paperwork: under W. Va. Code 37-6A-2, upon termination of the tenancy and within the applicable notice period, the security deposit held by the landlord, minus any deductions for damages or other charges, must be delivered to the tenant together with a written itemization of those damages or charges. The itemization on this page is that statutory statement, structured so each deduction stands on its own line with its own reason and amount.

The itemization is where a deposit dispute is usually won or lost. A specific, receipt-backed statement that subtracts documented damage from the deposit and hands back the balance rarely ends up in court. A vague statement that lumps charges together, or that quietly buries ordinary wear and tear among real damage, is the one a West Virginia magistrate reads under 37-6A-5 and, on a finding of willful or bad-faith withholding, multiplies by one and one-half. This page gives you a working generator that builds the statement and computes the refund automatically, plus a full guide to the moving parts of West Virginia deposit law: the notice-period statement duty under West Virginia security deposit law, the list of permitted deductions under 37-6A-2, the ban on itemizing wear and tear, the one-year record-keeping duty under 37-6A-3, and the enhanced-damages penalty under 37-6A-5.

Build Your West Virginia Security Deposit Itemization

Complete the fields below to build a state-appropriate itemized statement ready to print, sign, and deliver with any refund balance. Enter the deposit, add each deduction with a specific description, and the generator subtracts the total deductions from the deposit to compute the refund balance automatically. If the deductions exceed the deposit, the tool reports the additional balance the tenant owes instead of a refund. The live summary updates as you type, and the same math is written into the PDF statement.

What a West Virginia Itemization Statement Is

West Virginia’s security deposit rules live in the Residential Rental Security Deposit Act, codified at W. Va. Code 37-6A-1 through 37-6A-6 and enacted in 2011. The itemization duty is embedded in 37-6A-2. That section is direct: upon termination of the tenancy and within the applicable notice period, the security deposit held by the landlord, minus any deductions for damages or other charges, must be delivered to the tenant together with a written itemization of those damages or charges. The statute gives the landlord one basic obligation once the tenancy ends and possession returns: account for the deposit and hand back the balance, and if anything is kept, say in writing exactly why. The itemization is the vehicle that carries those exact reasons, line by line, to the tenant.

Two duties travel together in the same envelope. First, the itemization accounts for the money: it shows the original deposit, subtracts each documented deduction, and arrives at the balance. Second, the deposit balance itself must accompany the statement. A landlord who delivers the itemization but holds the undisputed balance pending some further step, or who pays the balance without the statement, has not complied with 37-6A-2 even if the numbers are correct. Both the statement and any refund must reach the tenant inside the notice-period window. The generator above keeps the two aligned by computing the balance directly from the deductions you enter, so the number on the statement is the number you send.

Because the statement is a legal document rather than a courtesy, its tone matters less than its precision. A West Virginia magistrate reviewing a contested deposit reads the itemization first, and the specificity of each line does most of the persuading. For the broader framework of authorized uses, timing, and remedies that sits alongside the itemization duty, our West Virginia security deposit laws guide walks through the full statutory scheme, and the West Virginia move-in and move-out checklist supplies the condition record that supports every line of this statement.

How the West Virginia Notice-Period Deadline Works

West Virginia does not measure the deadline in a single flat number of days the way many states do. Instead, 37-6A-2 requires delivery within the applicable notice period, and 37-6A-1 defines that term. Under the definitions section, the notice period is the shorter of two clocks: sixty days after the termination of the tenancy, or forty-five days after a subsequent tenant occupies the premises. Whichever of those two comes first is the deadline. The practical effect is that a landlord who re-rents the unit quickly loses the benefit of the full sixty days, because the forty-five-day clock triggered by the new tenant’s occupancy can expire earlier.

Read the two clocks together and the discipline becomes clear. If the unit sits vacant, the landlord has up to sixty days from the day the tenancy ended to deliver the statement and the balance. If a new tenant moves in on, say, the twentieth day after the old tenancy ended, the forty-five-day clock from that occupancy would run to roughly day sixty-five, so the sixty-day clock still governs and the landlord has sixty days. But if the new tenant moves in on day one, the forty-five-day clock expires around day forty-six, well before the sixty-day clock, and that earlier date is the deadline. Because the answer depends on the re-rental date, the statement should record both the termination date and the possession date, and the landlord should track any new occupancy that could shorten the window.

The statute also builds in one narrow extension. If the damages to the premises exceed the amount of the security deposit and require the services of a third-party contractor, the landlord may give the tenant written notice of that fact within the applicable notice period, and doing so earns an additional fifteen-day period to provide the itemization of the damages and the cost of repair. The extension is not automatic: it requires timely written notice, and it applies only to the contractor-driven itemization, not to an open-ended delay. The safer practice is to itemize from the move-out inspection and dated photographs, deliver on time, and rely on the fifteen-day extension only when a genuine contractor estimate cannot be produced within the base window.

What May and May Not Be Deducted

West Virginia lists the permitted uses of a deposit in 37-6A-2, and the itemization must respect that list. A landlord may apply the security deposit to five categories of charge: the payment of rent due, including reasonable charges for late payment of rent; damages the landlord suffered by reason of the tenant’s noncompliance with the rental agreement, less reasonable wear and tear; unpaid utilities that were billed to and paid by the landlord and are the tenant’s obligation under the rental agreement; the reasonable costs of removing and storing the tenant’s personal property; and other damages or charges provided in the rental agreement, including the cost of a third-party contractor to repair damage. Anything outside those categories does not belong on the itemization.

The one category the landlord may never itemize is the natural aging of the unit. The damage line is capped by the phrase less reasonable wear and tear: only the portion of harm that exceeds ordinary use is deductible. West Virginia treats normal wear and tear as the gradual, expected deterioration that comes from ordinary living: faded paint, minor carpet wear along walking paths, small nail holes from hanging pictures, and light scuffing near door handles. Damage is the opposite, harm outside ordinary use that a reasonable tenant could have avoided: large holes in drywall, burns or heavy staining in carpet, broken fixtures, pet-urine saturation, smoke damage from indoor smoking, missing appliances, and unauthorized alterations.

The discipline the itemization enforces is to keep the two categories apart on the page. A statement that lists a genuine drywall repair alongside a charge for faded paint invites a magistrate to distrust the whole document, because the wear-and-tear line signals that the landlord did not draw the line the statute draws. Specificity is not a stylistic nicety here; it is the difference between a defensible deduction and a forfeited one. Each line should name the location, describe the specific condition, state the cost, and reference the supporting receipt or photo. When a line is vague, a court reviewing the deposit under 37-6A-5 can weigh that vagueness against the landlord when it decides whether the withholding was willful or not in good faith.

Deductible versus non-deductible at a glance

Tenant Remedies: One-and-One-Half-Times Damages and Attorney’s Fees

The enforcement teeth are in 37-6A-5. If a landlord fails to comply with any of the provisions of the article and that noncompliance is willful or not in good faith, the tenant is entitled to a judgment for the amount of any unreturned security deposit and for damages for annoyance or inconvenience equal to one and one-half times the amount wrongfully withheld, together with court costs and reasonable attorney’s fees. That one-and-one-half multiplier is what makes a sloppy itemization expensive: a modest improper deduction, once identified by the court as a willful or bad-faith withholding, is not merely reversed but increased by half again, and the tenant’s legal costs are added on top.

The statute draws a meaningful line at the landlord’s state of mind. The enhanced damages attach only when the noncompliance is willful or not in good faith. A landlord whose failure was neither willful nor in bad faith, for example an honest miscalculation corrected once it surfaced, faces the return of the deposit amount owed but not the one-and-one-half-times multiplier. In practice that distinction rewards landlords who keep disciplined records: a timely move-out inspection, an itemized statement with a line for each documented item, receipts behind each charge, and proof of delivery are exactly the facts that show good faith and blunt a claim that the withholding was willful.

West Virginia also folds a rent-offset rule into the same section. If the tenant owes rent to the landlord, the court is directed to credit an amount equal to any award to the tenant against the rent due. That provision prevents a tenant who left owing rent from collecting the enhanced-damages award free and clear while the unpaid rent goes unaddressed; the two figures are netted. The itemization is therefore not just a compliance chore. It is the evidence that anchors the good-faith position if a number is ever challenged, and the accounting that frames any rent offset the court must apply.

The Move-Out Condition Record Behind the Itemization

West Virginia’s statute does not impose the formal move-in and move-out inspection ritual that some states require, but that absence makes the landlord’s own documentation more important, not less. The itemization does not spring from thin air; every deductible line has to be traceable to a condition that the landlord can prove existed at move-out and did not exist, as ordinary wear and tear aside, at move-in. Because the statute supplies no mandatory checklist, the burden of establishing the baseline falls entirely on the records the landlord chooses to keep, and a magistrate weighing a contested deduction under 37-6A-5 looks first to that documentation.

The practical routine is straightforward. At move-in, record the condition of the unit room by room, ideally with dated photographs and a signed condition report, so the starting point is fixed and not a matter of later memory. At move-out, repeat the exercise the same way, comparing each room against the move-in record and photographing any damage that will become a line on the itemization. The gap between the two records is the deductible damage, and the closer in time the move-out record is compiled to the tenant’s departure, the more weight it carries. A record assembled weeks later, after the unit has been cleaned or partly repaired, is far easier for a tenant to attack than one dated to the day the keys came back.

Sequencing matters as much as substance. The condition record should be complete before the itemization is finalized, because each deductible line on the statement is only as strong as the paired before-and-after evidence behind it. Where a tenant attended a walk-through and acknowledged specific damage, that acknowledgment is powerful support for the corresponding line. Because the move-out record is the raw material of the itemization, the West Virginia move-in and move-out checklist is the natural companion to this form: the checklist captures the condition on both ends, and the itemization converts documented damage into dollars. Building the itemization in that order, rather than mailing a finished statement the tenant has never seen, converts the condition record from a loose habit into the backbone of a defensible deduction.

The No-Waiver Rule Under 37-6A-4

West Virginia protects the itemization duty from being drafted away in the lease. Under 37-6A-4, a rental agreement may not contain a provision by which the tenant agrees to waive or forego rights or remedies under the article, and any such provision is unenforceable. A lease clause that purports to let the landlord keep the deposit without an itemization, to shorten the notice period, to bar the tenant from the record-inspection right, or to strip the enhanced-damages remedy is simply void; the statutory duties survive the clause. The itemization requirement is therefore not something a landlord can contract out of, no matter how the lease is worded.

The section also carries its own penalty aimed at overreaching enforcement. If a landlord brings an action to enforce a prohibited provision, the tenant may recover the actual damages sustained plus reasonable attorney’s fees. That remedy is separate from the 37-6A-5 penalty for wrongfully withholding a deposit, and it targets a different wrong: not the withholding itself, but the att