Free West Virginia Lead Paint Disclosure
The federal disclosure every West Virginia landlord must deliver before leasing housing built before 1978. Authority is 42 U.S.C. 4852d and 40 CFR Part 745 Subpart F. West Virginia adds no lead disclosure statute of its own — and the 10-day inspection window you see on other sites is a sales rule, not a rental rule.
A West Virginia lead paint disclosure is the federally mandated form a landlord delivers to a prospective tenant before any lease of residential property built before 1978. It carries the fixed federal lead warning statement, states the lessor’s actual knowledge of lead-based paint and hazards, lists the records being handed over, documents the tenant’s receipt of the EPA pamphlet Protect Your Family From Lead in Your Home, captures any agent’s acknowledgment, and is signed and dated by every party. Authority is 42 U.S.C. 4852d (Section 1018 of Title X, the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992), implemented at 40 CFR Part 745 Subpart F (EPA) and 24 CFR Part 35 Subpart A (HUD). West Virginia imposes no separate lead paint disclosure statute — the duty here is purely federal. West Virginia’s own lead law, the Lead Abatement Act at W. Va. Code Chapter 16, Article 35, is a contractor-licensing and abatement regime, not a landlord disclosure duty, and the state’s landlord overlay is the habitability duty in our West Virginia habitability laws guide. Generate the form below, then read on for exactly what the rule requires.
- Pre-1978 is the only trigger. Original construction before 1 January 1978 makes the unit “target housing” and the disclosure mandatory. The build date controls even if the unit was gutted and rebuilt in 1995.
- West Virginia has no lead disclosure statute. The disclosure duty is 100% federal. West Virginia’s Lead Abatement Act (W. Va. Code Chapter 16, Article 35) is a licensing and abatement regime — it contains no lessor, lease, pamphlet, or disclosure obligation.
- The 10-day inspection window does not apply to leases. 40 CFR 745.110(a) gives it to purchasers only. The lessor rules at 40 CFR 745.113(b) contain no such item.
- The zero-bedroom exclusion is unconditional. A studio is not target housing even if a child under six lives there. Only the elderly-or-disabled limb of the definition carries the child condition.
- You never have to test. The rule compels disclosure of actual knowledge, not investigation. “No knowledge” is honest and lawful when nothing has been tested and you hold no reports.
- The 16-35-7(a) homeowner exemption does not reach a rental. West Virginia’s do-it-yourself abatement exemption is expressly withdrawn for any dwelling occupied by someone other than the owner or the owner’s immediate family.
- Deliver before the tenant is obligated, not at move-in and not with the keys. Late delivery is the same violation as no delivery.
- Retain the signed disclosure three years from the start of the leasing period (40 CFR 745.113(c)). It is your only real defence in an enforcement inquiry.
West Virginia lead paint disclosure overview
West Virginia Lead Paint Disclosure at a Glance
Trigger
Built before 1978
Authority
42 U.S.C. 4852d
WV Statute
None — federal only
Retention
3 years
Timing
Before lease obligation
Pamphlet
EPA, mandatory
Duty to test
No
10-day inspection
Sales only
What the West Virginia lead paint disclosure does
The lead paint disclosure — often called the Section 1018 disclosure, after the 1992 statute that created it — is the formal federal notice a West Virginia landlord delivers to a prospective tenant for any residential property built before 1978. It does four things in one document.
First, it puts the tenant on notice of potential lead exposure through the federally mandated lead warning statement, the fixed language at 40 CFR 745.113(b)(1) that must be attached to or included within the lease.
Second, it transmits the lessor’s actual knowledge of lead-based paint or hazards in the dwelling. The lessor picks one of exactly two positions: known lead-based paint or hazards are present, with a description of what is known; or the lessor has no knowledge of lead-based paint or hazards in the housing. There is no third box, and there is no “maybe”.
Third, it transmits any reports the lessor holds from prior inspections, risk assessments, or hazard-reduction work. The lessor either provides copies of all available records and lists them, or affirmatively states that no reports or records exist.
Fourth, it documents the tenant’s receipt of the disclosure and of the EPA pamphlet. The signed acknowledgment is the landlord’s primary defence in any later EPA or HUD inquiry or private civil action.
The disclosure is not optional and the duty is not waivable by agreement. A pre-1978 West Virginia rental leased without one exposes the landlord to government civil penalties and to a tenant’s private action for triple damages plus fees. Compliance takes fifteen minutes; non-compliance is the most expensive paperwork failure in pre-1978 rental practice.
Does West Virginia have its own lead paint law?
No. West Virginia has no state-specific lead paint disclosure statute, and this page will not invent one. Every substantive requirement described on this page comes from federal law: 42 U.S.C. 4852d, 40 CFR Part 745 Subpart F, and 24 CFR Part 35 Subpart A. This is the single most misreported fact on the West Virginia lead-paint internet, and it is worth being precise about, because the automated answers now circulating get it wrong in three distinct ways.
West Virginia does have a lead statute — but it is not a disclosure statute. The Lead Abatement Act at W. Va. Code Chapter 16, Article 35 is a real, in-force West Virginia law. Read section by section, though, it is a contractor-licensing and abatement regime administered by the state Bureau for Public Health. Its provisions cover a short title (16-35-1), legislative findings, definitions, the powers of the director, childhood screening, the lead discipline license, an abatement contractor’s duties, exemptions, notification of elevated blood-lead levels, notification of abatement projects, training-course accreditation, license discipline, a special revenue account, and penalties. Nowhere in the article is there a lessor, a lease, a pamphlet, or a disclosure obligation. It does not tell a landlord to hand a tenant anything before a lease. Confusing the Lead Abatement Act with a lead disclosure duty is the classic error, and it is exactly the conflation a lead-contractor certification regime invites: certifying who may disturb lead is a different thing from telling a tenant what you know about it.
What West Virginia actually adds for a landlord falls into three buckets, none of which is disclosure:
- Habitability — W. Va. Code 37-6-30. The landlord’s duty to deliver and maintain the premises “in a fit and habitable condition” and to comply with applicable health, safety, fire, and housing codes applies independently of disclosure. Deteriorated lead paint can be a habitability defect on its own, whether or not you disclosed it. Disclosure does not cure a hazard; it only discloses one. This is covered in depth in the state-overlay section below.
- The abatement licensing regime — W. Va. Code 16-35-5. It is unlawful in West Virginia to carry out a lead-risk assessment, inspection, or abatement activity without an appropriate lead discipline license. A West Virginia landlord cannot lawfully self-perform a lead inspection or abatement; that work goes to a licensed professional. This constrains how you respond to a hazard, not what you disclose.
- Local programs. Some West Virginia municipalities run rental-registration or licensing programs that can add inspection or notice obligations. These are municipal, not statewide, and they are not lead disclosure duties. Check with local code enforcement or the county health department before assuming none applies — but do not assume a city has a lead disclosure ordinance simply because an aggregator asserts one.
Three automated answers to distrust
First, some engines cite a “West Virginia Residential Property Condition Disclosure Act” at W. Va. Code 36-12. There is no such act there: Chapter 36, Article 12 is the Uniform Real Property Transfer on Death Act. Second, some answers restate the federal duty as though West Virginia law imposed it — “West Virginia law requires landlords to provide a lead-based paint disclosure.” No West Virginia law does; federal law does. Third, the West Virginia lead search results are polluted with Virginia results, and Virginia does have a lead notification statute (Va. Code 8.01-226.7). West Virginia has no analogue. On this page, no West Virginia disclosure statute is invented, no city ordinance is dressed up as state law, and no Virginia rule is imported.
What the rule actually requires: the six elements of 40 CFR 745.113(b)
Most guides list “three things” a landlord must do. The regulation is more precise than that. 40 CFR 745.113(b) requires six distinct elements in the lease or an attachment to it. A disclosure missing any one of them is defective, regardless of how professional the form looks. This is the checklist to audit your own paperwork against.
| Element | What 40 CFR 745.113(b) requires | Who completes it |
|---|---|---|
| (b)(1) Lead warning statement | The fixed federal paragraph, reproduced in its prescribed wording, attached to or inserted into the lease. | Pre-printed on the form |
| (b)(2) Lessor’s disclosure of known paint and hazards | A statement disclosing the presence of known lead-based paint and hazards, including any additional information available (for example location and the condition of painted surfaces) — or a statement of no knowledge. | Lessor |
| (b)(3) List of records and reports | A list of any records or reports available to the lessor that were provided to the lessee — or a statement that no such records exist. | Lessor |
| (b)(4) Lessee’s acknowledgment | A statement by the lessee affirming receipt of the information in (b)(2) and (b)(3) and receipt of the lead hazard information pamphlet. | Lessee (initials) |
| (b)(5) Agent’s statement | A statement that the agent has informed the lessor of the lessor’s obligations under 42 U.S.C. 4852d and is aware of their own responsibility to ensure compliance. | Agent (initials, or N/A) |
| (b)(6) Signatures certifying accuracy | The signatures of the lessors, agents, and lessees certifying to the accuracy of their statements, with dates. | All parties |
Note what is not in that list: no inspection window, no testing requirement, no filing with any agency, and no obligation to remediate. The rule is an information-transfer rule. It makes you tell the truth about what you know and hand over what you hold; it does not make you go looking.
The item nobody mentions: the lessee’s agent
Element (b)(5) is often described as “the agent signs”. In practice there can be two agents, and they are treated differently. The lessor’s agent must always complete the item where one is engaged. The lessee’s agent item is conditional — the current EPA lessor form carries a footnote limiting it to a lessee’s agent who receives compensation from the lessor. Where no agent is involved at all, the item is marked not applicable rather than left blank, so the record shows the question was addressed.
Target housing: the pre-1978 trigger
“Target housing” is the federal term for property subject to the rule. The definition at 40 CFR 745.103 is residential dwellings constructed before 1 January 1978, subject to the narrow exclusions in the next section.
Why 1978 — and which 1978 date actually governs. The operative cutoff comes from the definition itself: 40 CFR 745.103 defines target housing as housing constructed prior to 1978, meaning construction before 1 January 1978. The historical reason that year was chosen is the Consumer Product Safety Commission’s ban on lead-containing paint at 16 CFR 1303.1 — but that ban applies to paint manufactured after 27 February 1978, which is not the same date. Competing pages routinely merge the two and report the CPSC ban as effective 1 January 1978. It was not. The distinction has no practical effect on your compliance answer, because the construction cutoff in 745.103 is what decides coverage, but it does tell you which cite to trust: for whether your unit is covered, read 745.103, not the CPSC rule. Housing constructed from 1 January 1978 onward sits outside the disclosure regime entirely.
How to verify the build year in West Virginia. The county assessor’s record is the fastest authoritative source, and every West Virginia county assessor maintains it. The original certificate of occupancy, the building permit file, and title records also establish it. The lessor carries the burden of correctly identifying target housing — “I think it was around 1980” is not a defence, and a guess that turns out wrong is a knowing violation waiting to happen.
Renovation does not reset the clock. A 1962 building stripped to the studs and rebuilt in 2001 is still target housing. The original construction date controls, not the date of the most recent renovation. This trips
