Home › Free Forms › Arizona Landlord Forms › Arizona Lease Renewal Agreement

Free Arizona Lease Renewal Agreement

In Arizona the interesting question is not how a lease renews but what happens if nobody renews it. The holdover limb of A.R.S. § 33-1375 sends a tenant who stays on down one of two very different roads, and the fork is whether the landlord consented in writing.

Written Consent Decides The Outcome A.R.S. § 33-1375 Arizona Free PDF
Updated Q3 2026 By Tenant Screening Background Check Editorial Team Reviewed for Arizona ~21 min read

A lease renewal is an agreement to carry an existing tenancy into a further term. It is not a new lease unless the parties sign one, and in Arizona whether you may renew at all is a matter of contract — neither of the two sections captured for this page gives a tenant a right to renew, so the lease decides. What state law does supply is the consequence of doing nothing, and that consequence is unusually sharp in Arizona, because it turns on a single written act.

Build your Arizona lease renewal agreement

Fill in the fields below and the generator produces a clean, dated PDF that the landlord and every tenant can sign and keep a copy of. Nothing is stored and there is no charge. Fields you leave blank print as a dash so you can complete them by hand.

The fork in the road is written consent

The holdover limb of A.R.S. § 33-1375 provides that if the tenant “remains in possession without the landlord’s consent after expiration of the term of the rental agreement or its termination, the landlord may bring an action for possession and if the tenant’s holdover is willful and not in good faith the landlord, in addition, may recover an amount equal to not more than two months’ periodic rent or twice the actual damages sustained by the landlord, whichever is greater.” The section then closes with the other road: “If the landlord consents in writing to the tenant’s continued occupancy, section 33-1314, subsection D applies.” Note: three limits sit inside that first sentence. The holdover must be willful and not in good faith; the two months’ periodic rent is a ceiling on its own limb rather than a tariff; and the statute gives the landlord something it says the landlord may recover, which is permission to seek rather than an award that follows automatically. A tenant who stayed a week because a closing slipped is not obviously in that category at all.

Build your Arizona lease renewal agreement
THE PARTIES
THE PROPERTY
THE LEASE BEING RENEWED
THE RENEWAL TERM
RENT
WHAT CHANGES AND WHAT DOES NOT
DEPOSIT
CONTINUED OCCUPANCY AND CONSENT
NOTICE AND CONDITION
EXECUTION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Watch: Free Arizona Lease Renewal Agreement explained

Free Arizona Lease Renewal Agreement
▶ Watch overview

Arizona lease renewal at a glance

Holding over without consent

The landlord may bring an action for possession

Holding over with written consent

Periodic, unless the rental agreement fixes a definite term

Notice to end month-to-month

At least 30 days

Notice to end week-to-week

At least 10 days

Arizona note: The extra sum in the holdover limb of § 33-1375 is available only where the holdover is willful and not in good faith, and only in addition to possession. The statute sets it as an amount equal to “not more than two months’ periodic rent or twice the actual damages sustained by the landlord, whichever is greater”. The words not more than govern the two-months limb; they are not attached to the actual-damages limb. And the statute says the landlord may recover it — it is not a sum that accrues by itself.

What happens when the landlord does consent in writing

Section 33-1314(D) supplies the answer, and it opens with a condition that governs everything after it: “Unless the rental agreement fixes a definite term, the tenancy shall be week-to-week in case of a roomer who pays weekly rent, and in all other cases month-to-month.” So where the parties’ own writing does not fix a definite term, written consent converts what would have been a holdover into an ordinary periodic tenancy — month-to-month for almost every residential tenant. Where the writing does fix a definite term, subsection (D) does not make the tenancy periodic at all. Note: the trigger in § 33-1375 is a landlord who consents in writing. That is a narrow gate, and it is worth being precise about: if you want the periodic tenancy, put the consent in writing, and if you want to keep the possession route open, do not sign anything that reads as consent.

How to use an Arizona lease renewal agreement

The five-step sequence

Read the existing lease first

Whether a renewal is available at all, and on what notice, is set by the lease before it is set by statute. Note any deadline the lease imposes for asking, because neither captured section supplies one.

Decide well before the end of the term

The costly outcomes in the holdover limb of section 33-1375 all begin at the moment the term expires with nothing signed. The document below exists to stop that moment arriving undecided.

Write down the new term and the new rent

A renewal continues the existing lease as amended, so anything you do not change carries forward. Name the changes explicitly rather than assuming them.

If the tenant is staying on without a new fixed term, record the consent in writing

Section 33-1375 makes the landlord’s written consent the trigger for section 33-1314(D), and (D) applies unless the rental agreement fixes a definite term. Where it does apply, the tenancy is month-to-month in every residential case except a roomer paying weekly rent.

If you are ending it instead, use the right notice period

Under the month-to-month notice limb of section 33-1375, at least thirty days prior to the periodic rental date specified in the notice. Under the week-to-week notice limb, at least ten days prior to the termination date specified in the notice. Either party may give either notice, and both must be in writing.

What an Arizona lease renewal agreement does

This document records that an existing tenancy is continuing, on what terms, and for how long. It amends the lease rather than replacing it: every term the parties do not change carries forward unchanged. That matters more than it sounds, because the commonest renewal dispute is not about the rent but about a term one side assumed had lapsed. In Arizona it does a second job as well. Where the parties are not agreeing a new fixed term but the tenant is staying on, a signed document is the clearest possible evidence of the written consent that the holdover limb of § 33-1375 makes the dividing line between an ordinary periodic tenancy and an action for possession.

What an Arizona lease renewal agreement should record

  • The parties, exactly as they are named on the lease being renewed.
  • The property, including the unit number.
  • The date the original lease was signed and the date its term ends.
  • Whether the parties are agreeing a new fixed term or a periodic tenancy – and if a fixed term, say so plainly, because section 33-1314(D) applies only where the rental agreement does not fix a definite term.
  • If the tenant is staying on without a new fixed term, the landlord’s written consent to that.
  • The new term – its start date, and its end date if it is a fixed term.
  • The rent for the new term, and whether it has changed.
  • Every other term that is changing, and a statement that the rest continue unchanged.
  • What happens to the deposit already held.
  • The date, and a signature from the landlord and from every tenant named on the lease.

Common Arizona mistakes

  • Letting the term expire with nothing signed. That is the precise moment the holdover limb of § 33-1375 starts to operate, and it is entirely avoidable.
  • Treating the two months’ rent as an entitlement. The statute makes it an amount the landlord may recover, of not more than two months’ periodic rent or twice the actual damages, whichever is greater — the ceiling sits on the two-months limb — and it is available only where the holdover is willful and not in good faith.
  • Assuming an oral go-ahead is consent. Section 33-1375 makes the trigger for § 33-1314(D) a consent in writing.
  • Assuming subsection (D) always makes the tenancy periodic. It opens unless the rental agreement fixes a definite term. If what the parties signed fixes one, the periodic default in (D) does not arrive.
  • Counting the 30 days from the wrong date. The month-to-month notice limb measures the period to the periodic rental date specified in the notice, not thirty days from the day the notice is written.
  • Changing the rent without changing the document. A renewal that carries forward the old rent figure while the parties have agreed a new one is an invitation to a dispute nobody needs.

Does an Arizona lease renew automatically?

Not by force of the sections captured for this page. Neither A.R.S. § 33-1314 nor § 33-1375 gives a residential tenant a right to renew a lease, so the starting point is always the lease itself. If the lease contains a renewal or extension clause, that clause governs, and its deadlines are real deadlines. If it does not, a renewal happens when both sides agree one and not before. Whether a renewal is available therefore depends on what the lease says before it depends on anything in the statute.

The practical consequence is that the end of an Arizona fixed term is a decision point, not a formality. Somebody has to do something. What the statute supplies is not a way of renewing but a set of consequences for the situation where nobody did, and those consequences are worth understanding before the date arrives rather than after.

What happens if the term ends and the tenant stays

A.R.S. § 33-1375, in its holdover limb, divides that situation in two, and the divider is consent. Where the tenant “remains in possession without the landlord’s consent after expiration of the term of the rental agreement or its termination”, the landlord “may bring an action for possession”. That is the ordinary route, and it is available whatever the tenant’s reason for staying.

The same sentence then adds a second remedy, and this is the one most often misquoted. Where “the tenant’s holdover is willful and not in good faith”, the landlord “in addition, may recover an amount equal to not more than two months’ periodic rent or twice the actual damages sustained by the landlord, whichever is greater.”

Read that slowly, because three separate limits sit inside one sentence.

The first is the double condition. The holdover must be willful and not in good faith, and those are two requirements rather than a single idea expressed twice. A tenant who stayed three days past the end of a term because a moving truck failed has not obviously satisfied both.

The second is the verb. The statute says the landlord may recover the amount. It does not name a court, it does not describe a discretion exercised by anybody, and it does not create a sum that accrues by itself while the tenant remains. What it does is give the landlord something the landlord may seek, in addition to possession. Nothing in either captured section says more than that about how the amount is obtained, and this page does not fill the gap in.

The third is the phrase not more than. It is a ceiling, and it sits on the two-months limb of the disjunction. The statute reads “not more than two months’ periodic rent or twice the actual damages sustained by the landlord, whichever is greater”: the cap