Which South Carolina rental properties require a lead-based paint disclosure?

Any residential rental in South Carolina whose original construction was completed before 1 January 1978 - what the rule calls target housing. It does not matter where the property sits, how large it is, whether it is a bungalow in Charleston or a duplex in Greenville, or whether anyone has ever seen a flake of lead paint on it. The trigger is the build year, not the condition of the paint. The duty is federal, under 42 U.S.C. 4852d and 40 CFR Part 745 Subpart F, and South Carolina adds nothing to it. A handful of narrow federal exemptions apply: zero-bedroom units and designated housing for the elderly or persons with disabilities, each only where no child under six resides or is expected (40 CFR 745.103 as amended effective 13 January 2025, 89 FR 89416); leases of 100 days or less with no possibility of renewal; housing certified lead-free by a certified inspector; and renewals where you already disclosed and nothing new has come into your possession.

Does South Carolina have its own lead paint law for landlords?

This is the question the search results get wrong, and the honest answer has two halves. Half one: South Carolina adds NOTHING to the disclosure duty. Read the whole of the state's lead statute and the word disclosure does not appear once. The paperwork you owe a tenant at lease-up is 100% federal. Half two, and the half nearly every page and every AI summary misses: South Carolina is not a state without a lead law. The Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention and Control Act, S.C. Code s. 44-53-1310 et seq., is real, it is enforceable, and it points squarely at property owners. Once DHEC identifies a lead-based hazard in a dwelling where a child under six lives, s. 44-53-1430 requires the department to post the unit, notify the householder, and give the property owner written notice and an order to remediate within a reasonable period. Then s. 44-53-1440 bites: you may not rent or offer that posted unit for occupancy by children until the hazard is remediated. So South Carolina imposes no disclosure duty and a real hazard-control duty at the same time. Both halves are true and you need both.

Can South Carolina stop me renting out a unit because of lead?

Yes - and this is the single most consequential South Carolina lead fact for a landlord, and it appears on essentially no other page. S.C. Code s. 44-53-1440 says, verbatim: "A person must not rent or offer for occupancy a dwelling or dwelling unit to be occupied by children which has been posted and ordered remediated of lead-based hazards until the identified hazards have been remediated." Note the trigger carefully. It is not the build year and it is not the mere presence of lead paint. It is that DHEC has actually posted the unit and ordered remediation under s. 44-53-1430 after identifying a lead-based hazard where a child resides. Until you remediate, the unit is off the market for families with children. It is also worth reading what the section does NOT say: it does not bar renting to households without children, and it is written as a prohibition on the person renting, not as a licensing scheme.

Can I evict a family if DHEC finds lead in their unit?

No - not for that reason. The second sentence of S.C. Code s. 44-53-1440 is explicit: "If the presence of the lead-based hazard becomes known when the dwelling or dwelling unit is already rented to a family with children, the family of the children must not be evicted for that reason." South Carolina anticipated the obvious landlord response to a remediation order - remove the children rather than the lead - and closed it. The hazard becoming known is not a ground for eviction. You remediate; the family stays. This is a genuine South Carolina tenant protection and we could not find it stated on any competing page.

What is the federal Lead Warning Statement?

It is fixed language that must appear in the lease or in an attachment to it. As codified at 40 CFR 745.113(b)(1) it reads: "Housing built before 1978 may contain lead-based paint. Lead from paint, paint chips, and dust can pose health hazards if not managed properly. Lead exposure is especially harmful to young children and pregnant women. Before renting pre-1978 housing, lessors must disclose the presence of known lead-based paint and/or lead-based paint hazards in the dwelling. Lessees must also receive a federally approved pamphlet on lead poisoning prevention." You do not paraphrase it, shorten it, soften it or modernise the wording. One wrinkle worth knowing: EPA's own sample lease form - printed at 61 FR 9075 in the 1996 rulemaking that adopted the rule, and the ancestor of nearly every lead paint template in circulation - inserts one word the codified text omits, reading "the presence of KNOWN lead-based paint." The regulatory text as enacted omits it, in both EPA's 40 CFR 745.113(b)(1) and HUD's identical 24 CFR 35.92(b)(1). Nothing of substance turns on it: the sentence is a warning, not the duty, and the operative duty at 745.113(b)(2) is limited to known paint and hazards either way. The generator on this page prints the codified wording instead. Both EPA and HUD prescribe the statement in fixed terms and then set it out without that word, so that is what a signed South Carolina disclosure should carry. Most lead paint templates in circulation descend from EPA's sample and do carry the extra word; if your counterparty's form does, that is a cosmetic difference in a warning sentence, not a defect in the disclosure.

Do I have to give a South Carolina tenant 10 days to inspect for lead?

No. The 10-day evaluation opportunity in 40 CFR 745.110(a) runs to PURCHASERS only. The text is explicit: "Before a purchaser is obligated under any contract to purchase target housing, the seller shall permit the purchaser a 10-day period ... to conduct a risk assessment or inspection." The word lessee does not appear anywhere in that section. The statutory hook, 42 U.S.C. 4852d(a)(1)(C), is scoped the same way. The lease disclosure at 40 CFR 745.113(b) contains no inspection item at all - the sales disclosure at 745.113(a)(5) is the only one carrying a received-or-waived statement. So there is no federal 10-day inspection right for a South Carolina tenant, and South Carolina creates none. There is a ten-day period in South Carolina's lead statute, but it has nothing to do with tenants: s. 44-53-1400(3) requires an administrative warrant to be executed and returned within ten days of issuance. That is a rule about DHEC's paperwork, not a tenant entitlement. You may of course offer a prospective tenant time to have the unit evaluated; that is a voluntary courtesy and good practice, but it is not the law and it does not belong on the form as a legal entitlement.

Does the disclosure apply to a studio apartment?

It depends on whether a young child lives there - and this is where most write-ups are now out of date. 40 CFR 745.103, as amended effective January 13, 2025 (89 FR 89416), defines target housing as "any housing constructed prior to 1978, except housing for the elderly or persons with disabilities or any 0-bedroom dwelling (unless any child who is less than 6 years of age resides or is expected to reside in such housing)." The 2025 amendment moved the child parenthetical to the end of the except-clause, so it now attaches to the 0-bedroom limb as well as the elderly-and-disabled limb. A pre-1978 studio IS target housing when a child under six resides or is expected to; it is exempt only when no such child does. That is the citable point older charts still get wrong. The same regulation defines a 0-bedroom dwelling as "any residential dwelling in which the living area is not separated from the sleeping area," and says the term "includes efficiencies, studio apartments, dormitory housing, military barracks, and rentals of individual rooms in residential dwellings." One caution specific to South Carolina: even where the federal exemption applies, it does not release the unit from S.C. Code s. 44-53-1310 et seq., whose hazard definition turns on a condition and a child, not on a bedroom count or a build year.

What are the penalties for failing to provide the disclosure?

Four distinct exposures, and the private one is usually the expensive one. First, federal civil penalties per violation under 42 U.S.C. 4852d(b)(1) and (b)(5); the operative amount is inflation-adjusted every year under 40 CFR 19.4, which is exactly why this page prints no figure - any number we published would be stale within a year, and most numbers you will find quoted elsewhere already are. Read the current table rather than a blog. Second, and far more dangerous, 42 U.S.C. 4852d(b)(3) makes a person who knowingly violates the rule liable to the tenant for TREBLE the amount of damages, with 4852d(b)(4) adding court costs, reasonable attorney fees and expert witness fees. The treble-damages limb needs no agency to act - the tenant sues. Third, HUD and EPA can pursue injunctive relief and negotiated compliance obligations. Fourth, and separately, if you violate South Carolina's own lead article or a DHEC order under it, s. 44-53-1485 provides a state civil penalty not to exceed one thousand dollars a day, and s. 44-53-1480 makes a knowing violation a misdemeanour with each day's violation a separate offence.

How long must I retain the signed disclosure?

No less than three years from the commencement of the leasing period, under 40 CFR 745.113(c). Not three years from signature, not three years from move-out - from the start of the leasing period. That retention rule is the entire legal requirement, and it is also the most practically valuable thing on this page, because nothing about a lead disclosure is filed with any agency. If a tenant later alleges you never disclosed, the dispute collapses to whether you can produce a signed document. Note what 745.113(c)(2) actually says about that recordkeeping provision: it "is not intended to place any limitations on civil suits under the Act, or to otherwise affect a lessee's or purchaser's rights under the civil penalty provisions of 42 U.S.C. 4852d(b)(3)." That means the three-year rule does not cap anyone's civil rights; it does not follow that a limitations defence is unavailable once three years pass, and we do not claim otherwise. Keep the file for as long as you own the building.

What if I do not know whether my property has lead-based paint?

Then you disclose that you have no knowledge, and you do it honestly. The rule never requires a South Carolina landlord to test. 40 CFR 745.107(a) says so in terms: "Nothing in this section implies a positive obligation on the seller or lessor to conduct any evaluation or reduction activities." That sentence matters here because at least one widely circulated summary tells South Carolina landlords they "must assess if there are any concentrations of lead paint" before renting. That is simply not the law. What the rule requires is that you disclose what you actually know and hand over the records you actually hold. "No knowledge" is a truthful answer for most owners of pre-1978 housing and it is a complete answer - but only if it is true. If you hold an inspection report, a risk assessment, a remediation record, or a building-wide evaluation, you must disclose and list it, and ticking "no knowledge" over the top of a report in your own file is the fact pattern that turns an ordinary violation into a knowing one, which is where treble damages live.

Can I deliver the lead paint disclosure electronically?

Yes, in the ordinary case. E-signature and e-delivery are workable under the federal E-SIGN Act, 15 U.S.C. 7001, provided the tenant consents to the electronic format and can retain a copy. What electronic delivery never changes is the timing: the disclosure and the EPA pamphlet must reach the tenant BEFORE the tenant is obligated under the lease. An e-sign flow that presents the disclosure on the same screen as the lease, at the moment of signature, has not satisfied the rule - it has merely automated the violation. Sequence the disclosure as its own step, earlier, and keep the audit trail with the signed copy.

Does the disclosure apply to lease renewals?

Often not. 40 CFR 745.101(d) exempts "renewals of existing leases in target housing in which the lessor has previously disclosed all information required under 745.107 and where no new information described in 745.107 has come into the possession of the lessor," and it says renewal includes both renegotiating existing terms and ratifying a new lease. Two conditions, both required: you actually disclosed the first time, and nothing new has come to you since. If you had an inspection done during the tenancy, or a renovation revealed hazards, or DHEC issued you a notice, that is new information and the exemption evaporates - disclose again before the renewal is signed. Note the exemption points to 745.107, not to 745.113, and note that none of the four exemptions in 745.101 carries a child condition.

Does non-disclosure void my South Carolina lease?

No - and you do not have to take EPA's word for it, because Congress wrote the answer into the statute. 42 U.S.C. 4852d(c), headed "Validity of contracts and liens", says: "Nothing in this section shall affect the validity or enforceability of any sale or contract for the purchase and sale or lease of any interest in residential real property or any loan, loan agreement, mortgage, or lien made or arising in connection with a mortgage loan, nor shall anything in this section create a defect in title." A failure to disclose therefore does not void the lease or hand the tenant an automatic right to walk away. What non-disclosure does is expose you to federal civil penalties and to a private treble-damages action with fee-shifting under 42 U.S.C. 4852d(b)(3)-(4). The lease survives; the liability is separate. Anyone telling South Carolina tenants that a missing lead form cancels their tenancy is describing a remedy the statute expressly withholds.

Home › Free Landlord Forms › South Carolina Landlord-Tenant Laws › Lead Paint Disclosure

Free South Carolina Lead Paint Disclosure

The federal disclosure every South Carolina landlord must deliver before leasing housing built before 1978. Authority is 42 U.S.C. 4852d and 40 CFR Part 745 Subpart F. South Carolina adds no disclosure statute of its own — but it does have a lead law that can bar you from renting the unit at all, and the 10-day inspection window you see on other sites is a sales rule, not a rental rule.

Federally Required 42 U.S.C. 4852d 40 CFR Part 745 S.C. Code 44-53-1310 Free PDF

Updated Q3 2026 By Tenant Screening Background Check Editorial Team Reviewed for South Carolina ~19 min read

A South Carolina lead paint disclosure is the federally mandated form a landlord delivers to a prospective tenant before any lease of residential property built before 1978. It carries the fixed federal lead warning statement, states the lessor’s actual knowledge of lead-based paint and hazards, lists the records being handed over, documents the tenant’s receipt of the EPA pamphlet Protect Your Family From Lead in Your Home, and captures the acknowledgments of tenant and agent. The disclosure duty is entirely federal — South Carolina adds nothing to it. But South Carolina is not a state without a lead law, and the part it does have is the part nobody writes about: under S.C. Code s. 44-53-1440 a posted, unremediated unit may not be rented to families with children at all. Generate the completed PDF below, then read on for how both rules actually work here.

South Carolina lead paint disclosure explained

Watch

How the federal lead paint disclosure rule applies to pre-1978 South Carolina rentals.

South Carolina Lead Paint Disclosure at a Glance

Trigger

Built before 1978

Authority

42 U.S.C. 4852d

Deadline

Before lease obligation

Retention

3 years minimum

SC disclosure statute

None — federal only

SC lead statute

44-53-1310 et seq.

10-day inspection

Sales only, not leases

Pamphlet

Required, every lease

The short answer: if your South Carolina rental was built before 1978, you must give every tenant this disclosure and the EPA pamphlet before they are obligated under the lease, then keep the signed copy for three years. South Carolina adds nothing to that paperwork duty. What South Carolina adds instead is a hazard-control regime: once DHEC identifies a lead-based hazard where a child under six lives, s. 44-53-1430 lets it order you to remediate, and s. 44-53-1440 stops you renting that posted unit to families with children until you do.

What the South Carolina lead paint disclosure does

The disclosure exists because of a simple, brutal piece of public-health arithmetic. Paint sold for homes in the United States contained lead in quantities that are now understood to cause permanent neurological injury in small children, and the housing that paint went onto is still standing and still being rented. Congress responded in 1992 with Section 1018 of Title X, the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act, codified at 42 U.S.C. 4852d. EPA and HUD implemented it jointly, EPA’s half living at 40 CFR Part 745 Subpart F.

What the rule does not do is as important as what it does. It does not require you to test for lead. It does not require you to remove lead paint. It does not make lead paint illegal to have in a rental. It does not give a tenant a right to cancel the lease. It is an information-transfer rule: Congress decided that a tenant deciding whether to sign a lease on pre-1978 housing is entitled to know what the landlord knows, and to hold a standard federal pamphlet explaining the risk. Nothing more, and nothing less.

That distinction is worth holding onto through the rest of this page, because South Carolina’s own lead law sits on the other side of it. The federal rule governs information. South Carolina’s statute governs hazards. They trigger on different facts, they are enforced by different people, and complying with one tells you nothing about the other. Almost every page ranking for this topic collapses the two, in one direction or the other. If you also handle South Carolina habitability obligations and South Carolina landlord entry rules, treat the lead disclosure as a third, independent track.

The core duty in one paragraph

Before a tenant is obligated under the lease on any South Carolina residential property built before 1978, you must hand over the EPA pamphlet, disclose every lead-based paint hazard you actually know about, give the tenant every record you hold, include the fixed federal Lead Warning Statement, collect the tenant’s and any agent’s acknowledgments, and keep the signed document for three years from the start of the leasing period. South Carolina adds nothing to that list. It is federal law, it applies in every county, and there is no small-landlord exception.

Does South Carolina have its own lead paint law?

Yes and no — and the two-part answer is the whole point. Search results and AI summaries answer this question in one sentence, and whichever sentence they pick, they are half wrong. Here is the honest version, verified against the statute text on the South Carolina General Assembly’s own site.

Half one: South Carolina adds nothing to your disclosure duty. We read the state’s entire lead statute — the Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention and Control Act, S.C. Code s. 44-53-1310 through s. 44-53-1495, about 2,200 words across sixteen sections — and searched it for the vocabulary of a disclosure regime. The word “disclosure” appears zero times. So do “landlord”, “lessor”, “lessee”, “tenant”, “pamphlet”, “target housing”, “registry”, and “1978”. The paperwork you owe a prospective tenant at lease-up is 100% federal, and this page’s form is the whole of it.

The negative control runs the same way. The South Carolina Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, Title 27 Chapter 40 — over ten thousand words, the statute that actually governs your tenancy — contains “lead-based paint” zero times, “lead paint” zero times, “lead poisoning” zero times, “1978” zero times, “pamphlet” zero times and “target housing” zero times. It never cites 42 U.S.C. 4852d or any part of 40 CFR 745. The one thing the RLTA does require a South Carolina landlord to disclose at lease-up, at s. 27-40-420, is the name and address of the owner or the person authorised to receive process. That is it. Lead is not on that list.

Half two: South Carolina is not a state without a lead law. This is where nearly every competing page, and every AI answer we tested, stops reading and gets it wrong. The Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention and Control Act is real, it has teeth, and its sharpest sections point directly at property owners. It simply is not a disclosure statute — it is a hazard-control statute, and it is keyed to a child and a condition rather than to a lease and a build year.

Why the distinction is not academic

Get half one wrong and you invent a South Carolina disclosure duty that does not exist — harmless enough, until you start telling tenants about rights they do not have. Get half two wrong and you miss the fact that a South Carolina agency can order you to remediate a unit and prohibit you from renting it until you do. One error wastes paper. The other one takes your unit off the market while you are still advertising it.

South Carolina’s lead statute: what it actually does to a landlord

The Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention and Control Act dates to 1979 (Act No. 78) and was substantially rewritten by 2005 Act No. 142, effective 7 June 2005. It never uses the word “landlord”. It reaches you through three other words: person, property owner, and householder — the last of which, under s. 44-53-1320(8), expressly includes “the owner of an unoccupied dwelling unit or the owner’s agent”. If you own pre-1978 rental stock in South Carolina, this statute is about you.

What counts as a hazard, and for whom

Two definitions do the work. Under s. 44-53-1320(2), a “child” is a person under six years of age. Under s. 44-53-1320(10), a “lead-based hazard” is “a condition that causes exposure to lead from lead-contaminated paint, lead-contaminated dust, bare lead-contaminated soil, or other lead-based substance that is deteriorated in accessible surfaces, friction surfaces, or impact surfaces that would result in adverse human health effects.”

Read that carefully, because it is structurally different from the federal trigger. There is no build year in it. There is no bedroom count. It turns on deterioration, on the type of surface (accessible surfaces a child can mouth or chew, friction surfaces like windows and stair treads, impact surfaces like doors and jambs — each separately defined at s. 44-53-1320(1), (7) and (9)), and on adverse human health effects. A 1985 building is outside the federal disclosure rule entirely and still inside this definition if the conditions are met.

South Carolina’s threshold is stricter than the federal one

Here is a fact we could not find on a single competing page. Section 44-53-1320(11) defines a “lead-base substance” as “paint, lacquer, glaze, or other material containing more than six hundredths of one percent (0.06 percent) lead by weight, or seven-tenths or more milligrams per square centimeter (0.7 mg/cm2) of lead in the dried paint film ap