Free Arkansas 14-Day Notice to Cure or Quit

▶ Watch overview

The Arkansas 14-day notice to cure or quit is the notice a landlord serves for a remediable rental-agreement violation under the Residential Landlord-Tenant Act of 2007. Under Ark. Code section 18-17-701 the landlord specifies the noncompliance and the rental agreement terminates on a date not less than 14 days after receipt unless the tenant adequately remedies the violation. If the tenant neither cures nor vacates, the landlord enforces the termination by civil unlawful detainer under Ark. Code section 18-60-304. Generate a compliant notice below.

14-Day Cure Ark. Code section 18-17-701 Ark. Code section 18-60-304 Free PDF

An Arkansas Notice to Cure or Quit is the written termination notice a landlord serves for a non-rent, remediable breach of the rental agreement. It is grounded in Ark. Code section 18-17-701 of the Arkansas Residential Landlord-Tenant Act of 2007, which lets the landlord deliver written notice specifying the tenant’s noncompliance and stating that the rental agreement terminates on a date not less than fourteen (14) days after receipt unless the tenant adequately remedies the violation within that period. Enforcement of a termination runs through the civil unlawful-detainer statute, Ark. Code section 18-60-304, and service is governed by Ark. Code section 18-17-303. This notice is for a violation the tenant can fix; for unpaid rent use the Arkansas pay-rent-or-quit notice, and for non-remediable conduct use the Arkansas unconditional quit notice. Our Arkansas eviction notice laws guide covers the full process.

The Arkansas Notice to Cure or Quit is the written notice a landlord serves to terminate a tenancy for a remediable violation of the rental agreement, while giving the tenant a statutory chance to fix the problem first. It is grounded in Ark. Code section 18-17-701, which lets the landlord deliver written notice specifying the acts and omissions constituting the noncompliance and stating that the rental agreement terminates on a date not less than 14 days after receipt if the noncompliance is not remedied within 14 days.

The notice does three things in one document. First, it identifies the noncompliance. The statute requires the notice to specify the acts and omissions constituting the breach, so a vague reference to the rental agreement is not enough. State the covenant violated, the clause number, and the dated facts.

Second, it states the required cure and the 14-day deadline. The tenancy survives only if the tenant adequately remedies the noncompliance before the date specified in the notice, and that date must be at least 14 days after the tenant receives the notice. Spell out the specific, achievable action the tenant must take, so the cure is something the tenant can actually accomplish in the window.

Third, it states the consequence. The notice tells the tenant that if the noncompliance is not adequately remedied by the deadline, the rental agreement terminates and the tenant must surrender possession, and that the landlord will pursue a civil unlawful-detainer action under Ark. Code section 18-60-304 to recover possession. The generator on this page produces that notice with the required cure and the termination date stated.

The Arkansas cure-or-quit framework layers three overlapping mechanisms, and it matters which one the notice actually rides on. The Residential Landlord-Tenant Act of 2007 supplies the cure-or-terminate mechanism. Ark. Code section 18-17-701 provides that where there is noncompliance by the tenant with the rental agreement, the landlord may deliver written notice specifying the acts and omissions and stating that the rental agreement will terminate on a date not less than fourteen days after receipt if the noncompliance is not remedied in fourteen days. The rental agreement terminates as provided unless the noncompliance is remediable and the tenant adequately remedies it before the date in the notice.

The civil unlawful-detainer statute is Ark. Code section 18-60-304. It is the court action a landlord uses to actually recover possession once a tenancy has terminated and the tenant has not left. It is filed in Arkansas Circuit Court. A cure-or-quit notice that ripens into a termination is enforced through this civil process; the notice is the front end, the unlawful-detainer action is the back end.

The service statute is Ark. Code section 18-17-303. A notice under the 2007 Act may be delivered in hand to the tenant or by any method that brings it to the tenant’s attention, and formal service is by registered or certified mail to the address the tenant designated or the last-known residence. Because the 14-day period runs from receipt, the service method should be one that documents when the tenant received the notice.

The criminal failure-to-vacate statute at Ark. Code section 18-16-101 is a separate, older track under which a holdover tenant who willfully refuses to vacate after written notice can be charged with a misdemeanor. It is controversial and has drawn constitutional challenge. It is not the mechanism a landlord uses to litigate a curable lease violation; the civil unlawful detainer is. Non-remediable and criminal breaches skip the cure step and proceed straight to unlawful detainer.

One operational rule binds the framework together: the notice must match the statute and the facts. Giving fewer than 14 days, failing to specify the noncompliance, demanding an impossible cure, or serving by a method you cannot prove each risk getting the unlawful detainer dismissed and forcing the landlord to start over.

Arkansas uses different notices for different tenant defaults. Selecting the correct one is critical, because a notice that does not match the ground will not support an eviction.

Using a cure-or-quit notice for unpaid rent will not fit the rent track, which runs on a five-day grace period and a separate three-day unlawful-detainer demand. Using a cure-or-quit notice for genuinely non-remediable conduct is unnecessary, because Ark. Code section 18-17-701 requires a cure opportunity only where the breach can actually be remedied. Where a breach is remediable, giving the 14-day cure window is the statutorily correct and safest path.

The cure-or-quit notice under Ark. Code section 18-17-701 applies to material breaches of the rental agreement that are remediable, that is, breaches the tenant can adequately fix within the 14-day window. The following categories are typical remediable violations.

Standard curable violations

• Unauthorized pets – keeping a pet in violation of a no-pet clause, or exceeding the number of pets the agreement permits (this does not apply to assistance animals or emotional-support animals protected under the federal Fair Housing Act).
• Unauthorized occupants – additional residents beyond those named on the agreement, occupancy in excess of the limit, or subtenants without the landlord’s consent.
• Unauthorized alterations – painting, structural changes, or installation of fixtures without landlord consent.
• Failure to maintain the premises – hoarding, accumulation of garbage, sanitary violations, or failing to keep the unit in the condition the agreement requires of the tenant.
• Curable nuisance or disturbance – repeated loud music, parties, or disturbances of other tenants where the conduct can stop.
• Smoking violations – smoking in a non-smoking unit or building where the agreement prohibits it.
• Vehicle or parking violations – unauthorized vehicles or parking in unassigned spaces.
• Insurance or utility lapses – failing to maintain renter’s insurance where required, or failing to keep utilities in the tenant’s name.

Violations that should use an unconditional quit instead

• Drug crimes or other criminal activity on the premises.
• Violent crime, assault, or threats with weapons.
• Property destruction (waste) beyond ordinary wear and use.
• Repeated material breach – the same violation, repeatedly, after prior notices.
• Conduct creating an immediate threat to other tenants or the building.
• Use of the premises for prostitution, illegal gambling, or another criminal enterprise.

The cure period is fourteen (14) calendar days measured from the tenant’s receipt of the notice under Ark. Code section 18-17-701. The statute frames the termination as not less than fourteen days after receipt, so the receipt date, not the mailing date, starts the clock.

Counting begins the day after receipt. The day the tenant receives the notice generally does not count as day one, and the statute uses calendar days, so weekends and holidays are included.

Not less than is a floor, not a cap. Giving more than 14 days is permissible and often prudent; giving fewer than 14 is a defect that hands the tenant a defense. When in doubt, build in a cushion and recount.

Worked example – hand delivery. The landlord hand-delivers the notice on the 1st. Counting begins the 2nd, and the earliest lawful termination date is the 15th. If the tenant has not adequately remedied the noncompliance by then, the rental agreement terminates and the landlord may move to unlawful detainer.

Worked example – mailed notice. If the landlord serves by registered or certified mail under Ark. Code section 18-17-303, the receipt date is later than the mailing date, and the 14-day clock runs from receipt. Because the receipt date is what matters, keep the return receipt so the termination date is defensible. If the fourteenth day falls on a weekend or holiday, the conservative practice is to treat the termination date as the next business day.

Ark. Code section 18-17-303 governs how a landlord serves a notice under the Residential Landlord-Tenant Act. A notice may be delivered in hand or by any method that effectively brings it to the tenant’s attention, and formal service is by registered or certified mail. Because the 14-day clock runs from receipt, the method should be one that documents when the tenant received the notice. The service-method section below and the fillable form both record the method used.

Follow the rental agreement’s delivery terms

Many Arkansas rental agreements specify how notices are to be delivered. Where the agreement sets a delivery method, follow it in addition to a receipt-proving method, because a court will look to the agreement the parties made. Do not assume posting alone satisfies the receipt requirement under the thin statutory scheme.

Proof of service

The person who serves the notice should complete a proof of service stating the date and time of delivery, the method used, the identity of the person served if not the named tenant, the address where delivery occurred, and, for certified mail, the tracking number and the return-receipt date. Without a clear record of delivery, an unlawful-detainer action can stall on a factual dispute about whether and when the tenant received the notice.

Documentation retention

Retain the signed original notice, the proof of service, any certified-mail receipt, and photographs of a posting. If the tenant cures, the record supports closing the matter; if the case is contested, the same record is what the court will look to in deciding whether the notice was proper and timely.

Although Arkansas does not publish an exhaustive statutory checklist, a defensible cure-or-quit notice under Ark. Code section 18-17-701 should contain each of the following. Missing or vague content is the easiest thing for a tenant to challenge.

1. Identification of the parties – full legal names of the landlord and all tenants, including any subtenants or additional occupants.
2. Property address – full street address including unit number, city, county, state, and ZIP.
3. Description of the noncompliance – a specific, dated, factual description of the covenant breached; the statute requires specifying the acts and omissions constituting the noncompliance.
4. The agreement provision violated – the section or clause of the rental agreement, by number or page where possible.
5. The required cure – the specific, achievable action the tenant must take to remedy the breach.
6. The 14-day termination date – the date, not less than 14 days after receipt, on which the rental agreement terminates if the noncompliance is not adequately remedied.
7. Consequence language – that the landlord will pursue a civil unlawful-detainer action under Ark. Code section 18-60-304 if the tenant neither cures nor vacates.
8. The statutory basis – an express reference to Ark. Code section 18-17-701.
9. Date of the notice and landlord signature – or an authorized agent with written authorization.

For tenancies in federally assisted or public housing, additional federal notice content and grievance procedures may apply on top of the state framework. Verify those separately before serving.

Complete the form below to generate an Arkansas 14-day notice to cure or quit for a remediable rental-agreement violation. The form states the parties, the property, the noncompliance, the required cure, the 14-day termination date, the service-method section, and the consequence language. Serve in accordance with Ark. Code section 18-17-303 and retain the proof of service.

Arkansas does not have a statewide just-cause eviction requirement, and Arkansas law preempts local rent control. A landlord may terminate a tenancy in accordance with the rental agreement and the Residential Landlord-Tenant Act of 2007, subject to the federal Fair Housing Act. Arkansas is widely regarded as one of the most landlord-favorable states, precisely because its statutory tenant protections are so limited.

What Arkansas does not relax is the requirement to give a proper written notice, to allow the 14-day cure period where the breach is remediable under Ark. Code section 18-17-701, and to proceed through the courts rather than self-help. Federal fair-housing law prohibits terminating a tenancy for a discriminatory reason, and federal law protects certain tenants, for example protections tied to domestic violence in federally assisted housing.

No local overlays. Unlike California or Oregon, Arkansas cities do not layer their own just-cause or rent-control ordinances on top of state law, because state statute preempts municipal rent control. Landlords in Little Rock, Fort Smith, Fayetteville, Springdale, and Jonesboro follow the same state framework. The main overlay to watch for is a federal program (public housing authority rules, Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher requirements, LIHTC good-cause provisions), not a city ordinance.

A tenant who receives a cure-or-quit notice and the subsequent unlawful-detainer action has several defenses. Landlords should anticipate them and make the notice and process bulletproof.

Procedural defenses

• Defective notice content – vague description of the noncompliance, missing cure terms, missing statute citation, or missing signature or date.
• Short cure period – a termination date less than 14 days after receipt, contrary to Ark. Code section 18-17-701.
• Unproven receipt – no reliable proof of when the tenant received the notice, so the 14-day clock cannot be shown to have run.
• Wrong notice type – using cure-or-quit where the rent track applies, or where an unconditional quit for non-remediable conduct was warranted.
• Premature filing – filing the unlawful detainer before the 14-day period expired.
• Federal program non-compliance – failing to follow the additional notice and grievance rules in public or federally assisted housing.

Substantive defenses

• Cure was completed – the tenant adequately remedied the noncompliance before the date in the notice, so the rental agreement did not terminate.
• Cure was impossible or unreasonable – the cure demanded could not realistically be achieved in 14 days.
• No material breach – the alleged violation was minor, not a genuine breach, or had been waived by the landlord’s prior conduct.
• Discrimination – the notice violates the federal Fair Housing Act, which prohibits eviction on a protected-class basis.
• Habitability – Arkansas’s implied warranty of habitability is limited, but federal and lease-based habitability obligations may still bear on a defense; review the Arkansas habitability rules.
• Assistance-animal defense – if the unauthorized pet is actually an assistance animal protected under the federal Fair Housing Act, the cure-or-quit notice targeting it is improper; see the Arkansas pet and ESA rules.

• Giving fewer than 14 days. A termination date sooner than 14 days after receipt is contrary to Ark. Code section 18-17-701 and hands the tenant a defense.
• No proof of receipt. A delivery method that cannot show when the tenant received the notice means the cure clock cannot be proven to have run.
• Mixing rent and non-rent issues. Folding a rent demand into a cure-or-quit notice muddies the basis; rent follows the separate five-day and three-day track.
• Using cure-or-quit for non-remediable conduct. Drug activity, repeated violence, and waste do not require a cure opportunity; use the unconditional quit route.
• Vague or impossible cure demands. Comply with the agreement without specifics, or a demand the tenant cannot meet in 14 days, undercuts the notice.
• Counting from mailing instead of receipt. The clock runs from the tenant’s receipt, not the date the notice was sent.
• No proof of service. The record of delivery is what supports the unlawful-detainer action.
• Missing statute citation. Failing to cite Ark. Code section 18-17-701 leaves the notice’s basis ambiguous.
• Targeting an assistance animal. Assistance and service animals are protected under the federal Fair Housing Act.
• Filing before the period expires. Premature filing of the unlawful detainer is grounds for dismissal.
• Reaching for the criminal statute. The civil unlawful detainer under section 18-60-304 is the proper mechanism to litigate a cure-or-quit termination, not the controversial criminal failure-to-vacate statute.
• Using self-help. Changing locks, removing belongings, or shutting off utilities is illegal in Arkansas and exposes the landlord to damages.

The single most consequential decision in an Arkansas cure-or-quit matter is whether the breach is remediable at all, because that determines whether the tenant is entitled to the 14-day cure window under Ark. Code section 18-17-701. Get it wrong and the landlord either wastes 14 days on conduct that never needed a cure opportunity, or, worse, skips a cure the statute required and hands the tenant a clean procedural defense.

A breach is remediable when the tenant can undo it or bring the tenancy back into compliance. An unauthorized dog can be removed. An unauthorized occupant can move out. An unapproved paint job can be restored, or the landlord’s consent can be sought and the alteration corrected. Accumulated garbage can be cleared. A lapsed renter’s-insurance policy can be reinstated. In each case, at the end of 14 days the landlord can look at the premises and tell whether the tenant complied. That verifiability is the hallmark of a remediable breach and the reason a cure-or-quit notice fits.

A breach is non-remediable when the harm is already done and cannot be meaningfully undone, or when the conduct is criminal. A tenant who has run a drug operation out of the unit cannot cure the fact that it happened; a tenant who has committed serious waste cannot un-destroy the property; a tenant whose repeated violations show the breach will simply recur cannot credibly promise a durable cure. For that class of conduct, Arkansas does not require the landlord to offer a cure at all, and the correct instrument is an unconditional quit followed by unlawful detainer.

The gray zone is nuisance and repeated conduct. A single loud party is curable – the tenant can stop. A pattern of escalating disturbances after prior warnings starts to look non-remediable, because the cure the tenant offers is exactly the promise the tenant has already broken. Arkansas’s statute does not draw a bright line here, so the conservative practice is to give the cure notice on the first or second incident and reserve the unconditional quit for a documented pattern or for conduct that crosses into criminal territory. When the record is thin, giving the 14-day cure is the safer choice, because a court is far more likely to fault a landlord for skipping a cure than for offering one that was not strictly required.

Document the reasoning, not just the conduct. Because Arkansas’s statute is sparse and leaves the remediable-or-not question to the facts, a landlord who can show in the file WHY the breach was treated as curable (or not) is in a far stronger position if the tenant contests the notice. Note the covenant breached, the specific cure demanded, and why 14 days was a reasonable window for that particular fix.

The following timeline assumes an uncontested Arkansas cure-or-quit matter that proceeds to the civil unlawful-detainer action after the tenant fails to cure. Contested cases in the larger circuit courts – Pulaski, Benton, Washington, and Sebastian counties – can run substantially longer.

Two features of Arkansas practice shape the timeline. First, the unlawful-detainer statute allows a landlord to seek an early order of possession, which can move an uncontested case along quickly once the tenancy has properly terminated. Second, a defective 14-day notice – a short period, an unproven receipt date, or a vague cure demand – can send the whole matter back to the start, because the court will not grant possession on a notice that did not comply with Ark. Code section 18-17-701. The time spent getting the notice right is always shorter than the time lost refiling.

Arkansas is a preemption state for rent regulation, and its cities do not layer just-cause eviction ordinances on top of the state framework. That makes the cure-or-quit process essentially uniform statewide: a landlord in Little Rock follows the same 2007 Act termination mechanism as one in Fayetteville or Jonesboro. There is no municipal rent board to file with and no city-specific cure-period rule to layer on top of the 14-day statutory period.

The practical consequence is that, unlike California or Oregon, an Arkansas landlord does not need to check a patchwork of city ordinances before serving. What a landlord should still confirm is whether a FEDERAL program overlays the tenancy:

• Little Rock – no municipal rent control or just-cause ordinance; the state framework governs. Public and federally assisted housing in the city follows federal procedure.
• Fort Smith, Fayetteville, Springdale, Jonesboro, and North Little Rock – no municipal rent control or just-cause overlay; the state framework applies uniformly.
• Federally assisted tenancies anywhere in Arkansas – public housing authority rules, Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher requirements, and LIHTC good-cause provisions can add notice content and grievance steps on top of section 18-17-701. These are federal overlays, not city ordinances, and they are the main thing to check.

Because Arkansas preempts local rent regulation, a cure-or-quit notice that complies with state law is generally enforceable across the state without a separate local-ordinance analysis. The one exception is a federal program: where one applies, follow its additional requirements in addition to the state statute.

• Document the violation thoroughly with dated photographs, written observations, witness statements, and copies of any prior warnings before serving the notice.
• Confirm the breach is remediable before choosing the cure-or-quit notice over an unconditional quit, and note the reasoning in the file.
• State the noncompliance with specificity – what, when, where, by whom, and which agreement section it violates; the statute requires specifying the acts and omissions.
• State the cure with specificity and make sure it is achievable within 14 days.
• Set the termination date at least 14 days after receipt, and build in a cushion – “not less than 14” is a floor.
• Cite Ark. Code section 18-17-701 expressly on the notice.
• Serve by a receipt-proving method – hand delivery or registered or certified mail under section 18-17-303 – and follow any delivery terms in the rental agreement.
• Complete the proof of service immediately after delivery, with full details, and retain the certified-mail receipt.
• Calculate the deadline from receipt, not from mailing, using calendar days.
• Document any cure the tenant completes within the period, and honor it in writing; do not accept a partial cure without documenting it and, for contested cases, consulting counsel.
• Wait for the full period to expire before filing the unlawful detainer, and enforce through the civil action under section 18-60-304 – never the criminal failure-to-vacate statute and never self-help.
• Consult Arkansas landlord-tenant counsel for any contested case, given the state’s sparse statutory scheme.

Arkansas has no statewide rent control and, unlike most states, no general residential anti-retaliation statute, so the civil unlawful-detainer procedure and the federal fair-housing rule are the framework that matters most for a cure-or-quit eviction. See our guide to Arkansas eviction procedure for the full court process, and the Arkansas landlord-tenant laws hub for the broader statutory scheme.

Published by Tenant Screening Background Check

Established 2004 · 20+ Years · All U.S. States & Territories · Statute-Based · Attorney-Reviewed

A Private Eye Reports™ service trusted by landlords, property managers, and attorneys.