Free Louisiana Abandoned Property Notice

Louisiana does not have an abandoned-property statute for ordinary residential tenancies. That is not a research failure; it is the finding. All sixty-two articles of the Civil Code’s lease title and all eleven articles of the Code of Civil Procedure’s eviction title were read individually and swept, and between them they contain no storage period, no value threshold, no prescribed notice, no auction or public-sale machinery and no rule about proceeds for a tenant’s left-behind movables. What they do contain is a privilege over those movables, which is a very different thing from a right to keep them, and a one-line instruction to the officer executing an eviction warrant. This page sets out what exists, in the codes’ own words; separates the privilege from the self-help nobody has been granted; and names the two statutes most often quoted at this topic that are about something else entirely.

Fill in the fields below and the generator produces a dated record of property left behind you can print, sign, serve and keep a copy of. Nothing is stored and there is no charge. Fields you leave blank print as a dash so you can complete them by hand.

Watch: Free Louisiana Abandoned Property Notice — Fillable PDF explained

▶ Watch overview

This notice is not a statutory form, because Louisiana has no statutory form for it to be. The only Louisiana statute that prescribes an abandoned-property notice is the factory-built-home provision described below, and it does not reach an apartment or a house. For every other tenancy the codes are silent, and silence is exactly the condition in which a written record does the most work. In a state with a prescribed procedure, a lessor who followed it is protected because he followed it; Louisiana offers no such shelter, so what protects a Louisiana lessor is being able to show what was left behind, when the premises were found vacated, what he told the lessee, where the movables were kept, and that the lessee was given a real opportunity to collect them. The generator above produces a dated notice naming the premises and the parish, identifying the lessee, describing the movables, stating where they are held and how collection can be arranged, and leaving room to record how the notice was delivered and to what address. It asserts no privilege, demands no charge as a condition of release, and threatens no disposal — because none of those is a thing Louisiana law lets a lessor do on his own authority.

• The full names of the lessor or the agent who manages the property and of every lessee named in the lease.
• The address of the premises with any unit number, and the parish it is in.
• The date of the notice, which is the fact every later question is measured against.
• How the tenancy ended — the term expired, a notice to vacate was given, the premises appeared abandoned, or a warrant was executed — with the date.
• The date the premises were found vacated, and by whom.
• An itemised description of the movables left behind, with photographs referenced by date.
• Where the movables are being held, and whether they remain in the premises.
• How and when the lessee may collect them, with a contact name, a telephone number and the hours access can be arranged.
• A statement that no charge is being demanded as a condition of release and that no privilege is being asserted over the movables in this notice.
• Any forwarding address the lessee supplied, and the address this notice was sent to.
• How the notice was delivered — in person, by mail, or attached to a door of the premises — plus the lessor’s signature and the date.

• Quoting the fifteen-day self-storage rule. R.S. 9:4759.2 deems property abandoned fifteen days after a rental agreement expires and lets the owner dispose of it “without further notice” — at a self-service storage facility. It is not landlord-tenant law and has no application to a dwelling.
• Reading the lessor’s privilege as a possessory lien. Art. 2707 ranks the lessor as a creditor over the lessee’s movables. It is enforced by a writ of sequestration and a judicial sale, and it transfers nothing to the lessor by itself.
• Reading C.C.P. art. 4731(B) as permission to clear the unit. Its words are “take possession of the premises”. Removal of movables appears in it only as an indicium of abandonment, which is evidence the tenant has gone, not a right over what remains.
• Citing R.S. 9:3258 for a right to dispose. Its caption contains the words “dispose of property and things”, which is why keyword searches land on it, but its subject is the lessor’s own property. It confers nothing over a tenant’s movables.
• Carrying the factory-built-home procedure to furniture. R.S. 9:3259.3 applies only to a qualifying abandoned factory-built home on the lessor’s immovable property, and every period and figure in it belongs to that procedure alone.
• Treating its value figure as a disposal threshold. It is an eligibility ceiling: a home above it, or one carrying any mortgage, lien, privilege or security interest, is excluded from the procedure entirely. It restricts the lessor’s route rather than licensing summary disposal of cheap goods.
• Borrowing the certified-mail rule from C.C. art. 2695. That article governs attachments, additions and improvements to the leased thing and settles them at termination. A sofa and a box of clothes are not improvements.
• Turning an eviction timing figure into a storage clock. Five days, twenty-four hours, ninety days and thirty days all appear in the eviction title, and every one of them is about possession of the premises. None is a period for holding a tenant’s belongings.

Louisiana’s codes impose no storage period, no notice and no disposal procedure for a tenant’s left-behind movables in an ordinary residential tenancy. The whole of the statutory instruction about the goods is one clause addressed to the officer executing an eviction warrant: C.C.P. art. 4734 directs the sheriff, constable or marshal to execute the warrant “in the presence of two witnesses, by clearing the premises of any property therein, in order to put the lessor or owner in possession of the premises.” There is no direction to store the goods, no place named, no period stated, no notice owed, no sale mechanism and no allocation of proceeds.

That negative was tested rather than assumed. All sixty-two articles of the Civil Code’s lease title and all eleven articles of the Code of Civil Procedure’s eviction title were fetched individually from the Legislature’s own site, each accepted only on the caption printed in its own body, and swept over their net text with the site chrome removed. Across the lease title there are zero occurrences of abandon in any form, of personal property, personal effects or belongings, of storage, store or safekeep, of dispose or disposal, of auction or public sale. Across the eviction title, the same. And the same sweep on the same bytes does find the neighbouring concepts that exist: privilege, seizure, movable, judicial sale, proceeds, certified mail, notice to vacate, warrant, sheriff, and abandonment itself in arts. 4703 and 4731. The tool works. The rule is not there.

Before that is mistaken for freedom: no Louisiana jurisprudence was consulted for this page. Louisiana is a civil law jurisdiction, where jurisprudence constante is persuasive rather than binding, and nothing here quotes, paraphrases or attributes any holding. What can be said is that the codes impose no duty to store and confer no right to dispose. What cannot be said is that a lessor owes nothing.

No. The privilege is a security right realised through a court, and treating it as permission to keep, sell, donate or discard a tenant’s movables is the most consequential error available on this subject.

What the privilege is, in the code’s own words. Art. 2707: “To secure the payment of rent and other obligations arising from the lease of an immovable, the lessor has a privilege on the lessee’s movables that are found in or upon the leased property. In an agricultural lease, the lessor’s privilege also encompasses the fruits produced by the land.” It is broad on its face. Art. 2708 extends it to a sublessee’s movables “but only to the extent that the sublessee is indebted to his sublessor at the time the lessor exercises his right.” Art. 2709 even reaches a third person’s movable found on the premises “unless the lessor knows that the movable is not the property of the lessee”, and the third person “may recover the movable by establishing his ownership prior to the judicial sale”; failing that, “the movable may be sold as though it belonged to the lessee.”

Now read what those articles assume. A judicial sale. An officer of the court holding the movables. A third party intervening in a proceeding. Nothing in the lease title converts the privilege into ownership or into a power of disposal, and the census confirms it: across the sixty-two articles there is no occurrence of dispose, disposal, storage, auction or public sale at all. A privilege ranks a creditor. It does not transfer a thing.

The Code of Civil Procedure preserves the remedy without changing its character. Art. 4705: “Nothing in this Title shall be construed to deprive any lessor of any remedy heretofore allowed him either for the payment of rent due to him or for the seizure of any furniture found on the leased premises.” That is a savings clause. It saves a seizure remedy that is exercised through a writ; it does not manufacture a private one.

And Louisiana’s own definition of abandonment points away from the lessor rather than towards him. C.C. art. 3418 provides that “one who takes possession of an abandoned thing with the intent to own it acquires ownership by occupancy”, and that “a thing is abandoned when its owner relinquishes possession with the intent to give up ownership.” The test is the owner’s intent, not the lessor’s belief. Art. 3418 is a general property article rather than a landlord-tenant one, and this page does not publish that a Louisiana lessor may rely on it to take ownership of a departed tenant’s belongings. No case was read on the point.

It changes how the lessor gets the premises back. It changes nothing about the goods, because there is no rule about the goods to change. That distinction is the one competitors routinely lose.

C.C.P. art. 4731(B), verbatim: “After the required notice has been given, the lessor or owner, or agent thereof, may lawfully take possession of the premises without further judicial process, upon a reasonable belief that the lessee or occupant has abandoned the premises. Indicia of abandonment include a cessation of business activity or residential occupancy, returning keys to the premises, and removal of equipment, furnishings, or other movables from the premises.”

Two things about that paragraph get mis-stated constantly. First, its object is the premises. The words are “take possession of the premises”, and “removal of… movables” appears only in the list of indicia — facts suggesting the tenant has gone. Reading it as a grant of rights over movables that remain inside inverts the sentence. Second, the opening words are a real precondition: self-help repossession is available only “after the required notice has been given”, which is the notice to vacate under C.C.P. arts. 4701 and 4702. Art. 4731 also carries a disaster rule — in parishes subject to a federal disaster declaration, cessation of residential occupancy “shall not be deemed evidence of abandonment… for thirty days” after the initial declaration — and it prices noncompliance against the lessor, giving a residential lessee a statutory recovery measured as a fixed sum or twice the monthly rent, whichever is greater, plus a restraining order or preliminary injunction, with costs and attorney fees available to the prevailing party.

So the three routes to the premises are: the term expires and the lease “terminates upon the expiration of that term, without need of notice” (art. 2720); the premises appear abandoned after notice, and art. 4731(B) applies; or the lessor proceeds by rule to show cause and judgment, with a warrant issuing if the lessee does not comply “within twenty-four hours after its rendition” (art. 4733) and the warrant executed under art. 4734. For the movables, all three land in the same place: no storage period, no notice, no disposal right. Delivery when the tenant has gone is dealt with by art. 4703, which allows notices, process, pleadings and orders to “be attached to a door of the premises”. The wider eviction sequence is set out in our guide to Louisiana eviction notice laws.

None — and every day-count circulating for this topic in Louisiana has been lifted from a statute about something else. There are six numbers in play and it is worth being explicit about where each belongs.

The fifteen days in art. 2710 are the survival of the lessor’s privilege after movables leave the premises: he may seize them “for fifteen days after they have been removed if they remain the property of the lessee and can be identified.” It is a window for going to court, not a holding period.

The fifteen days in R.S. 9:4759.2 are the biggest trap on this subject. That section provides that “any personal property remaining at the self-service storage facility fifteen days after expiration of the rental agreement shall be deemed abandoned” and that “upon determination that the storage space is abandoned, the owner shall have the right to dispose of the personal property without further notice to the lessee.” Read the words “self-service storage facility”. It governs a storage-unit operator and a customer renting a storage space. It is a recent enactment, it says exactly what a landlord wishes his own rule said, and it is the single sentence most likely to be scraped onto a landlord-tenant page. Any page telling you that Louisiana lets a landlord dispose of a tenant’s belongings fifteen days after the lease ends is quoting the self-storage act at a dwelling.

The five days, the twenty-four hours, the ninety days and the thirty days all sit in the eviction title and all concern possession of the premises: the minimum notice to vacate, the time to comply with a judgment before a warrant issues, the period for which a judgment of eviction remains effective, and the disaster suspension. Grafting any of them onto the goods produces a figure the codes never wrote.

The honest answer is that a Louisiana lessor gets no statutory clock, in either direction. He is given no period he must observe, and no period after which anything becomes lawful.

That, and only that, has a statute. R.S. 9:3259.3 is the one Louisiana provision permitting a lessor to sell a tenant’s abandoned movables, and its scope is narrow enough that it must be described with its fence attached. It applies where a qualifying abandoned factory-built home sits on the lessor’s immovable property under a lease — a mobile-home lot — and it defines “abandoned movable property” as the contents, personal items or other movable property of the lessee left in that home. It does not reach an apartment, a house, or any tenancy without a factory-built home in it.

Its eligibility test runs the opposite way from the low-value-disposal threshold several states use. The section reaches only a home whose current fair market value does not exceed a stated ceiling and which is “not encumbered by a mortgage, lien, privilege, or security interest”; a more valuable home, or an encumbered one, is excluded from the procedure entirely. The figure restricts the lessor’s route. It does not license binning cheap furniture.

And even inside its own scope the section is a court procedure, not self-help. The lessee must be notified of the owner’s intention to enforce the privilege, in person or by certified mail to his last known address; the notice must carry a copy of the lease, an itemised statement of the claim, a description of the home and movables, and “a demand for payment within a specified time not less than fifteen days after the date of mailing or delivery of the notice”, with a statement that otherwise the property is to be advertised for sale or other disposition. An advertisement must be published in a newspaper of general circulation within fourteen days of mailing, and the sale may take place no sooner than thirty days after publication. Then the owner must file suit, attaching the lease, the notice, the advertisement and evidence of value, and certifying from a search of the parish mortgage records and the office of motor vehicles that nothing encumbers the home; only on being satisfied does the court “authorize the sale”. Afterwards the owner may satisfy the privilege from the proceeds “but shall hold the balance, if any, as a credit in the name of the lessee whose property was sold”, claimable for two years without interest and becoming the owner’s property if unclaimed. None of those periods, and none of those figures, may be carried onto an apartment.

For an ordinary tenancy, none is prescribed — because no disposal is authorised. There is no statutory contents list, no required address and no prescribed delivery method for any notice about a tenant’s abandoned movables. The sweep of the eviction title finds no reference to certified mail anywhere in it.

Louisiana’s tenancy notices are notices about something else. C.C.P. art. 4701 is the notice to vacate: the lessor “shall cause written notice to vacate the premises to be delivered to the lessee”, and “the notice shall allow the lessee not less than five days from the date of its delivery to vacate the leased premises.” C.C. art. 2695 is the notice about improvements — attachments, additions or other improvements the lessee made to the leased thing — and it is the only article in the lease title with a certified-mail requirement: appropriation of an improvement by the lessor “may only be accomplished by providing additional notice by certified mail to the lessee” after the time given to remove it has expired. Applying that article to a tenant’s loose belongings is wrong law: a television and a box of clothes are not improvements to the leased thing.

Which leaves the practical position. Nothing obliges a Louisiana lessor to write to a departed tenant about the movables, and nothing stops him. Given that the codes provide no procedure he can point to afterwards, a dated notice describing the movables, saying where they are and inviting collection is the only record he will have. It should assert no charge as a condition of release and threaten no disposal, because neither is a thing Louisiana authorises him to do on his own authority.

The pieces answer differently, and they have to be kept apart.

The notice to vacate is expressly waivable. C.C.P. art. 4701 says so in terms: a lessee “may waive the notice requirements of this Article by written waiver contained in the lease, in which case, upon termination of the lessee’s right of occupancy for any reason, the lessor or his agent may immediately institute eviction proceedings.” A Louisiana residential lease can and often does contain that clause.

The security-deposit rights are not waivable. R.S. 9:3254 provides that “any waiver of the right of a tenant under this part shall be null and void.” Note the words “this part”: it voids waivers of the deposit rules and is not a general Louisiana anti-waiver statute. The deposit rules themselves are a separate subject with their own timing, set out in our guide to Louisiana security deposit laws.

For abandoned property the question does not arise, and that cuts both ways. Because Louisiana grants a tenant no statutory storage period, no notice and no disposal protection, there is nothing for a lease to waive — and equally no statutory floor that a lease clause could not undercut. This page reports both halves. The subject is left to the contract, and nothing in the record establishes an outer limit on what a Louisiana lease may provide. What it certainly does not establish is that a clause can hand a lessor a self-help sale the codes never gave him.

One more provision has to be named because its caption invites the mistake. R.S. 9:3258 is headed “Lessor’s right to own, control, use, enjoy, protect and dispose of property and things”, and a keyword search for a Louisiana disposal right lands on it. Its body is a constitutional-property declaration about the lessor’s own private property — his right to the ownership, control, use, enjoyment, protection and disposal of what he owns, including alienation by lease. It says nothing about the lessee’s movables and confers no right over a tenant’s belongings. Quoting its caption as authority for clearing out an apartment would be a serious error.

They can, and this page does not survey them. Everything above is the Civil Code’s lease title, the Code of Civil Procedure’s eviction title, and the handful of Revised Statutes sections read alongside them. Louisiana’s parishes and municipalities have their own authority over housing, and New Orleans in particular operates registration and healthy-homes requirements that sit on top of the codes rather than replacing them. Those were not searched for this page and nothing here excludes them.

Two further limits of scope are worth stating rather than leaving a reader to assume. The Revised Statutes were scanned across Title 9 by caption, and a provision whose caption does not use words such as abandon, personal property, movable or storage could have been missed; other titles were not scanned. And federal overlays — servicemember protections, subsidised-housing rules, a bankruptcy stay — can sit on top of everything above regardless of what the codes say.

The practical consequence for a lessor is narrow but real. Louisiana gives him a lawful route to the premises and a lawful, judicial route to the rent. It gives him no route at all to the tenant’s movables, and no page can invent one for him. The wider map is in our guide to Louisiana landlord tenant laws.

Everything above turns on one question — what happens to the things a tenant leaves behind — and the answer is what it is because Louisiana gives a lessor a court remedy and never a self-help one. The route the tenancy took decides which rule applies, so the notice that ended it and the money still in dispute are governed separately.

Louisiana eviction notice laws. Louisiana security deposit laws. Louisiana landlord tenant laws.

Published by Tenant Screening Background Check

Established 2004 · 20+ Years · All U.S. States & Territories · Statute-Based · Attorney-Reviewed

A Private Eye Reports™ service trusted by landlords, property managers, and attorneys.