Free California Month-to-Month Rental Agreement

Civ. Code § 1946.1 governs the ending of a California periodic tenancy. The default for an owner is sixty days before the proposed termination date; that drops to thirty days where the tenant or resident has occupied the dwelling for less than one year. A tenant’s notice runs on a different measure entirely — a period at least as long as the term of the periodic tenancy. The section also prescribes how notice is served, requires a specific paragraph about abandoned property to appear in an owner’s notice, and forbids charging the tenant a fee for serving it.

Fill in the fields below and the generator produces a clean, dated PDF you can print, sign and keep with your records. Nothing is stored and there is no charge. Fields you leave blank print as a dash so you can complete them by hand.

Watch: Free California Month-to-Month Rental Agreement explained

▶ Watch overview

A California periodic tenancy is deemed renewed at the end of each implied term unless a party gives notice — that is the mechanism § 1946.1(a) describes, by reference to § 1945. So the document is not merely a record of terms; it is the thing that keeps renewing. Because the owner’s notice period turns on how long the tenant has lived there, the move-in date is worth recording on the face of the agreement rather than reconstructing later from old paperwork. The generator above asks for it separately from the date of the agreement, and asks which side of the one-year line the tenancy sits on, because those are the two facts § 1946.1(b) and (c) turn on.

• The full names of the owner and of every adult tenant
• The address of the premises, including the unit number
• The date the tenant first moved in, which selects between the 60-day and 30-day owner notice under § 1946.1(b) and (c)
• The rent, the interval it covers, and the day it falls due
• The term of the periodic tenancy, since a tenant’s notice must be at least that long
• That the tenancy is periodic and is deemed renewed until a party gives notice
• The address each party sends notice to, and that service follows CCP § 1162 or certified or registered mail
• That no fee is charged for serving a notice under this section, which § 1946.1(i) prohibits in any event
• The security deposit, where it is held, and what the tenant is told about its return
• Which utilities and services each party pays for, and the pet, smoking and guest rules

• Measuring the year from the current agreement. § 1946.1(c) asks whether the tenant or resident has resided in the dwelling or occupied the property for less than one year. Signing a new document does not reset that.
• Giving a tenant’s notice of “thirty days” by default. § 1946.1(b) asks for a period at least as long as the term of the periodic tenancy, which for a monthly tenancy is a month rather than a fixed count of thirty.
• Leaving out the abandoned-property paragraph. § 1946.1(h) says an owner’s notice shall contain it in substantially the same form, and it is quoted in the statute.
• Charging a notice-service fee. § 1946.1(i) prohibits a landlord or its agent from charging one, with no exception for actual costs or for a lease term purporting to authorise it.
• Assuming § 1946.1 is the only rule that applies. Subsection (g) says the section may not be construed to affect the authority of a public entity that otherwise exists to regulate or monitor the basis for eviction — a direct acknowledgement that local regulation sits alongside it.

Sixty days from the owner, or thirty if the tenant has been there under a year. Civ. Code § 1946.1(b) requires an owner giving notice under the section to give it at least sixty days before the proposed date of termination. § 1946.1(c) then provides that, “notwithstanding” subdivision (b), the owner’s notice is at least thirty days where a tenant or resident has resided in the dwelling or occupied the property for less than one year.

The tenant’s obligation is expressed differently, and the difference is the part most summaries flatten. § 1946.1(b) says a tenant giving notice “shall give notice for a period at least as long as the term of the periodic tenancy prior to the proposed date of termination”. For a month-to-month arrangement that is a month. It is not stated as thirty days, and on a tenancy with a different period it would not be thirty days at all.

§ 1946.1(a) sets the frame. Notwithstanding § 1946, a hiring of residential real property for a term not specified by the parties is deemed to be renewed as stated in § 1945 at the end of the term implied by law, unless one of the parties gives written notice of an intention to terminate the tenancy as provided in the section.

So a California periodic tenancy does not simply continue by inertia — it is renewed, term by term, by operation of the Civil Code, and a notice is what interrupts that renewal. That framing is why the section speaks of a “proposed date of termination” rather than of a number of days from service: the notice is aimed at a date, and the period is the run-up to it.

The current text of the section also reaches commercial real property hired by a “qualified commercial tenant”, a defined term covering a microenterprise, a restaurant with fewer than ten employees, or a nonprofit organization with fewer than twenty employees, each subject to a notification requirement. That language sits alongside the residential rules in the same subsections, which is worth knowing when you read the section cold — the commercial material is not a separate part of the statute and it can make the residential rule harder to pick out.

§ 1946.1(d) contains a second route to thirty days, and it is narrow. An owner of a residential dwelling may give thirty days’ notice if all of the following apply:

• the dwelling or unit is alienable separate from the title to any other dwelling unit;
• the owner has contracted to sell it to a bona fide purchaser for value and has established an escrow with a title insurer or underwritten title company, a licensed escrow agent, or a licensed real estate broker, each as defined in the statutes the subdivision cites;
• the purchaser is a natural person or persons;
• the notice is given no more than 120 days after the escrow was established;
• notice was not previously given to the tenant pursuant to the section; and
• the purchaser in good faith intends to reside in the property for at least one full year after the termination of the tenancy.

Six conditions, joined by “all of the following”. This is not a general “selling the property” exception, and it will not cover a sale to a company, a sale of a unit that cannot be conveyed separately, a notice given late in the escrow, or a purchaser who intends to re-let. An owner reaching for thirty days on this basis should be able to point at each of the six.

§ 1946.1(e) is a genuinely useful provision and it is easy to miss. After an owner has given notice of an intention to terminate, the tenant may also give notice under the section, provided that the tenant’s notice is for a period at least as long as the term of the periodic tenancy and that the proposed date of termination occurs before the owner’s proposed date.

In practice that means a tenant served with sixty days who finds somewhere in three weeks is not obliged to stay for the full sixty. They can give their own notice for a period at least as long as the periodic term, ending on a date earlier than the owner’s, and end the tenancy then. The alternative — treating the owner’s date as fixed for both sides — is a common and expensive assumption.

§ 1946.1(f) is specific: the notices required by the section shall be given in the manner prescribed in Code of Civil Procedure § 1162, or by sending a copy by certified or registered mail.

Those are the two routes. Neither an email nor a text message appears in the subsection, and a notice served in a way the section does not name is a notice whose validity is available to be argued about. Recording a notice address for each party in the agreement does not change what the statute permits, but it does mean that when a certified letter goes out, it goes to the address the other party agreed to receive things at.

§ 1946.1(h) requires that a notice given by an owner shall contain, in substantially the same form, a specific notification about abandoned personal property: that state law permits former tenants to reclaim abandoned personal property left at the former address, subject to certain conditions; that whether they can do so without incurring additional costs depends on the cost of storage and the length of time before it is reclaimed; and that in general those costs will be lower the sooner the former tenant contacts the landlord after being notified that property was left behind.

The statute quotes the wording, and the requirement is that the notice carry it in substantially the same form. This is the kind of clause that a form built for another state will simply not have, which is one of the concrete reasons a California notice should be drafted as a California notice.

§ 1946.1(g) says the section “may not be construed to affect the authority of a public entity that otherwise exists to regulate or monitor the basis for eviction”.

That is the Civil Code acknowledging, in its own text, that it is not the whole picture. Local ordinances in California can and do regulate the grounds on which a tenancy may be ended, and § 1946.1 is about the notice rather than about whether an ending is permitted in the first place. A page that presented sixty days as the complete answer for every California address would be leaving out something the section itself points at.

The section opens with the words “Notwithstanding Section 1946”. That opening tells you two things without your having to read the older section: another Civil Code provision covers some of the same ground, and where the two meet, § 1946.1 is the one that governs the tenancies it names — residential real property, and commercial real property hired by a qualified commercial tenant.

The reason to notice this is practical rather than academic. A search for California’s month-to-month notice rule will surface both sections. This page has read § 1946.1 and not § 1946, so it does not tell you what the older section provides; what it can tell you is that § 1946.1 opens by displacing it, and that a residential periodic tenancy is squarely inside § 1946.1’s scope.

The renewal mechanism the section relies on comes from a third place again. § 1946.1(a) provides that the tenancy is “deemed to be renewed as stated in Section 1945, at the end of the term implied by law” unless a party gives notice. So three sections are in play on a question most states answer in one, and the drafting is layered rather than consolidated.

§ 1946.1 is unusual in covering two quite different worlds in the same subsections. Its periods apply to a residential dwelling and, in the same breath, to commercial real property hired by a “qualified commercial tenant”.

That term is defined at § 1946.1(k)(4) as a tenant of commercial real property that is a microenterprise, a restaurant with fewer than ten employees, or a nonprofit organization with fewer than twenty employees, and that has provided the landlord with the notification the subdivision goes on to describe. “Microenterprise” takes its meaning from Business and Professions Code § 18000(a), and “nonprofit organization” means a private nonprofit qualifying under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. “Commercial real property” is defined at (k)(1) as all real property in the state except dwelling units subject to the chapter, mobilehomes as defined in § 798.3, and recreational vehicles as defined in § 799.29.

One duty attaches only to the commercial side: § 1946.1(j) requires a landlord of commercial real property to include, in the notice the section requires, information on the provisions of the section itself.

None of this changes the residential answer, but it explains why the section reads awkwardly if you come to it expecting a residential provision. The phrase “or commercial real property hired by a qualified commercial tenant” recurs inside the same sentences that set the sixty and thirty-day periods, and it is easy to lose the residential rule inside it.

The move-in date is the single most useful fact a California month-to-month agreement can record, because it is what selects between sixty and thirty days and it is the fact most likely to be lost as tenancies roll over and paperwork is replaced. The generator above asks for it separately from the date of the agreement for exactly that reason, and then asks which side of the one-year line the tenancy currently sits on.

After that: the term of the periodic tenancy, since a tenant’s notice is measured by it; the notice address for each party; and the ordinary terms of rent, deposit, utilities, pets and house rules. On the deposit, the accounting begins when the tenancy ends, which on a periodic tenancy can be any month of the year — see California security deposit laws. For rent changes, which come up more often on a periodic tenancy than on a fixed term, see California rent increase laws. And if a notice is ignored, California eviction notice laws covers the process that follows and the notices belonging to it.

A periodic tenancy is the arrangement where rent changes most often, because there is no fixed term holding the number still. The notice a rent change takes is a separate question from the notice that ends the tenancy, and the two are easily confused — so they are worth reading together. Our guide to California rent increase laws covers how a rent change works on a periodic tenancy here.

The deposit is the other thing a month-to-month tenancy makes harder, because the tenancy can end on short notice and the clock for returning the money starts running the moment it does. California security deposit laws cover what a landlord may deduct and the deadline for accounting for the rest — a deadline that is easy to miss when a tenancy can end at any point in the year rather than at the end of a lease term.

If the notice is ignored, ending a tenancy stops being a paperwork question and becomes a court one. California eviction notice laws set out the notices that come next and how they must be served. A termination notice and an eviction notice are different documents doing different jobs, and serving the wrong one is one of the more common ways a straightforward ending turns into a contested case.

Published by Tenant Screening Background Check

Established 2004 · 20+ Years · All U.S. States & Territories · Statute-Based · Attorney-Reviewed

A Private Eye Reports™ service trusted by landlords, property managers, and attorneys.