Free Indiana Month-to-Month Rental Agreement
Indiana’s statute on this is two sentences long. The first sets one month’s notice in writing. The second is the one nobody quotes, and it changes how the first one applies: a tenancy at will cannot arise or be created without an express contract.
Ind. Code § 32-31-1-1 is headed “Determination of Estates at Will” and reads, in full: “(a) A tenancy at will may be determined by a one (1) month notice in writing, delivered to the tenant. (b) A tenancy at will cannot arise or be created without an express contract.” That is the entire section. Its brevity is not a gap to be filled with assumptions — subsection (b) in particular does real work, because it means an Indiana tenancy at will has to be agreed, not inferred from conduct.
Build your Indiana month-to-month rental agreement
Fill in the fields below and the generator produces a clean, dated PDF you can print, sign and keep with your records. Nothing is stored and there is no charge. Fields you leave blank print as a dash so you can complete them by hand.
One month in writing — and no tenancy at will by implication
Two rules in two sentences. § 32-31-1-1(a): a tenancy at will may be determined by a one-month notice in writing, delivered to the tenant. Both qualifiers are on the face of the subsection — unlike Ohio, whose equivalent provision omits the word “written” entirely. § 32-31-1-1(b): a tenancy at will cannot arise or be created without an express contract. So the question “did a tenancy at will come into being here?” is answered by looking for an agreement, not by looking at how the parties behaved.
Watch: Free Indiana Month-to-Month Rental Agreement explained
Indiana month-to-month tenancy at a glance
Notice to determine the tenancy
One month, in writing
How it must reach the tenant
Delivered to the tenant
Can a tenancy at will arise by implication?
No — § 32-31-1-1(b)
Tenant’s own notice
Not addressed by § 32-31-1-1
Why subsection (b) matters more than it looks
In most states a tenancy can arise by operation of law: a tenant stays on after a lease expires, the landlord keeps taking rent, and a periodic tenancy is implied from that conduct. Indiana’s § 32-31-1-1(b) says a tenancy at will cannot arise or be created without an express contract, which forecloses that route for this particular kind of tenancy. The practical consequence for anyone drafting is straightforward and worth taking seriously: if the parties want a month-to-month arrangement in Indiana, they should make one, in writing, rather than allowing a situation to drift into being and assuming the law will characterise it the way they expect. A signed agreement is the express contract the subsection is asking for.
How to end an Indiana tenancy at will
Confirm there is an express contract
§ 32-31-1-1(b) makes this the threshold question. Without one the arrangement is something else, and the one-month notice in (a) is addressed to a tenancy at will.
Count one month, not thirty days
The subsection says “a one (1) month notice”. In a 31-day month a thirty-day count comes up a day short of what the statute asks for.
Put it in writing
§ 32-31-1-1(a) requires a notice in writing. There is no oral route on the face of the section.
Deliver it to the tenant
The subsection specifies delivery to the tenant but does not say when the month starts running. Keep evidence of the delivery date, because that is the only date the section itself identifies.
Name the termination date
The section does not require a date, but a notice without one leaves the parties to reconstruct when the month ended. State it and state the date it was calculated from.
About the Indiana month-to-month rental agreement
Indiana legislates lightly here, and the written agreement carries the weight the Code does not. § 32-31-1-1 supplies a notice period and an existence requirement and nothing else — no service method, no notice address, no holdover remedy, nothing about a tenant giving notice. All of that is left to the parties, which makes an Indiana month-to-month agreement less of a formality than it is in a state with a detailed periodic-tenancy statute. It is also, under subsection (b), the express contract the tenancy needs in order to exist as a tenancy at will in the first place. The generator above asks that question directly, and records the notice address and delivery method the Code leaves open.
What an Indiana month-to-month agreement should record
- That the parties are expressly contracting for the tenancy — the requirement § 32-31-1-1(b) imposes
- The full names of the landlord and of every adult tenant
- The address of the premises, including the unit number
- The rent, the interval it covers, and the day it falls due
- That the notice period is one month rather than a count of thirty days
- That notice must be in writing and delivered, as § 32-31-1-1(a) requires
- The notice a tenant must give, which the section does not address
- The address each party sends notice to, and the delivery method
- The security deposit, where it is held, and what the tenant is told about its return
- Which utilities and services each party pays for, and the pet, smoking and guest rules
Common Indiana mistakes
- Reading “one month” as thirty days. The statute uses a calendar month. Michigan’s § 554.134(1) makes the same choice, and both states mean it.
- Assuming a tenancy at will arose because rent kept being paid. § 32-31-1-1(b) says it cannot arise or be created without an express contract, which shuts off exactly that inference.
- Relying on an oral notice. Subsection (a) requires writing and delivery. Both are on the face of the section, and neither is satisfied by a conversation.
- Expecting the section to tell a tenant what to give. It speaks of a notice “delivered to the tenant”. A tenant’s own notice obligation has to come from the agreement.
- Assuming § 32-31-1-1 settles what happens on a holdover. It attaches no remedy at all, so what follows a tenant staying past the month is a matter for the agreement and the possession process, not for this section.
How much notice ends a month-to-month tenancy in Indiana?
One month, in writing, delivered to the tenant — where the arrangement is a tenancy at will. Ind. Code § 32-31-1-1(a) provides that a tenancy at will may be determined by a one-month notice in writing, delivered to the tenant. There is nothing else in the subsection: no prescribed content, no service method, no requirement that the date line up with a rent cycle.
Read the qualifier in that answer, because the statute insists on it
§ 32-31-1-1 is headed “Determination of Estates at Will” and every operative word in it is about a tenancy at will. The phrase “month-to-month” appears nowhere in the section, and the section does not say that a month-to-month arrangement is a tenancy at will. Most Indiana month-to-month tenancies rest on an express agreement terminable at will by either side, and that is the arrangement this section ends. But the bridge is a matter of how your particular tenancy was created, not something § 32-31-1-1 states — so if the arrangement is something else, this is not the section that governs it, and this page does not pretend otherwise.
The unit is worth taking literally. The statute says one month, which is a calendar measurement, and converting it to “thirty days” quietly changes the answer in the seven months of the year that have thirty-one. Michigan’s § 554.134(1) makes the identical choice of word, and the same care applies there.
Writing and delivery are both required
Indiana is more explicit than some of its neighbours on this. Ohio’s R.C. § 5321.17(A) and (B) say only “by notice given the other” and never use the word written. Indiana’s subsection requires a notice in writing and requires it to be delivered. Both words are conditions, not description.
Subsection (b): a tenancy at will has to be agreed
The second sentence of the section is the one that changes how the first applies: “A tenancy at will cannot arise or be created without an express contract.”
Elsewhere, a periodic tenancy commonly comes into existence by implication. A fixed term expires, the tenant stays, the landlord accepts rent, and the law characterises what follows as a month-to-month tenancy created by the parties’ conduct. Indiana’s subsection (b) forecloses that route for a tenancy at will. The arrangement has to rest on an express contract.
For anyone drafting, that turns a piece of good practice into something closer to a prerequisite. If the intention is a month-to-month tenancy, the parties should make one on purpose and in writing rather than letting a situation develop and assuming the label will attach itself. A signed agreement is the express contract the subsection asks for, and it is also the document that will answer every question § 32-31-1-1 does not.
What the statute leaves entirely to the parties
The section says nothing about:
- How the notice is served. It requires delivery to the tenant and stops there. No method is prescribed, so evidence of delivery is what the notice ultimately rests on.
- Where the notice goes. There is no statutory notice address. If the parties do not fix one, a notice sent to somewhere the other side no longer is may not have been delivered at all.
- What a tenant must give. The subsection describes a notice delivered to the tenant. It does not set a period for a tenant who wants to leave.
- What happens on a holdover. Several states in this set attach an express remedy to a tenant who stays past the termination date — and in both Arizona and Kentucky the extra remedy is gated on the holdover being willful and not in good faith, running to two months’ rent or twice actual damages in Arizona, and three months’ or threefold plus fees in Kentucky, the latter only where that state’s local-option act was adopted. Indiana’s section is silent.
Each of those is a term the agreement can supply, and each of them is a dispute avoided. The generator above collects all four.
Tenancy at will, or something else?
The section is addressed to a tenancy at will, and that label is doing work. It is not a synonym for “any tenancy without a fixed end date” in every context, and the characterisation of an arrangement depends on how it was created and how rent is reserved rather than on what the parties called it in conversation.
This is another reason to write the agreement rather than rely on understanding. An agreement that says plainly what the parties intend — a month-to-month tenancy, rent reserved monthly, continuing until determined by one month’s written notice — leaves very little for anyone to characterise afterwards.
Where a month-to-month tenancy meets the rest of Indiana law
A periodic tenancy is the arrangement where rent changes most often, because there is no fixed term holding the number still. The notice a rent change takes is a separate question from the notice that ends the tenancy, and the two are easily confused — so they are worth reading together. Our guide to Indiana rent increase laws covers how a rent change works on a periodic tenancy here.
The deposit is the other thing a month-to-month tenancy makes harder, because the tenancy can end on short notice and the clock for returning the money starts running the moment it does. Indiana security deposit laws cover what a landlord may deduct and the deadline for accounting for the rest — a deadline that is easy to miss when a tenancy can end at any point in the year rather than at the end of a lease term.
If the notice is ignored, ending a tenancy stops being a paperwork question and becomes a court one. Indiana eviction notice laws set out the notices that come next and how they must be served. A termination notice and an eviction notice are different documents doing different jobs, and serving the wrong one is one of the more common ways a straightforward ending turns into a contested case.
Bottom line
Two sentences of statute, both about a tenancy at will — the section never says “month-to-month”. § 32-31-1-1(a) gives one month’s notice in writing, delivered to the tenant; (b) provides that a tenancy at will cannot arise or be created without an express contract, which shuts off the “the tenant stayed and the landlord kept taking rent” route for that kind of tenancy. Whether some other tenancy arises on those facts is a question § 32-31-1-1 does not answer.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much notice ends a month-to-month tenancy in Indiana?
One month, where the arrangement is a tenancy at will. Ind. Code § 32-31-1-1(a) provides that a tenancy at will may be determined by a one-month notice in writing, delivered to the tenant. Note the qualifier: the section is headed “Determination of Estates at Will” and never uses the phrase “month-to-month”. Most Indiana month-to-month tenancies rest on an express agreement terminable at will, which is what this section ends, but the section does not itself say so.
Is one month the same as thirty days?
Not in every month. The statute uses a calendar month, so a thirty-day count falls short in any month that has thirty-one days.
Does the notice have to be in writing?
Yes. § 32-31-1-1(a) requires a notice in writing and requires it to be delivered to the tenant. Both are conditions on the face of the subsection.
What does “a tenancy at will cannot arise without an express contract” mean?
It is subsection (b), and it means an Indiana tenancy at will has to be agreed rather than inferred from conduct. In many states a periodic tenancy can come into being because a tenant stayed on and the landlord kept accepting rent; that route is closed here.
How much notice does an Indiana tenant have to give?
§ 32-31-1-1 does not say. It describes a notice delivered to the tenant and sets no period for a tenant giving notice, so a tenant’s obligation comes from the rental agreement.
How must the notice be delivered?
The subsection requires delivery to the tenant and prescribes no method. It also does not say when the month begins running, so the delivery date is the only date the section identifies and evidence of it is what the notice rests on.
What happens if the tenant stays past the month?
§ 32-31-1-1 attaches no holdover remedy — unlike Arizona and Kentucky, whose periodic-tenancy sections attach one where the holdover is willful and not in good faith. What follows in Indiana is a matter for the agreement and for the possession process rather than for this section.
Do we need a written agreement at all?
For a tenancy at will, subsection (b) makes an express contract a condition of the tenancy existing as one. Beyond that, the section leaves service, notice address, the tenant’s notice and the holdover consequences entirely to the parties, so the agreement is where those answers have to come from.
Screen Indiana tenants thoroughly before move-in
A solid tenant relationship starts with thorough screening. Tenant Screening Background Check has been verifying renters since 2004 — credit, eviction filings, criminal background, and employment — across all 50 states and DC.
Related Resources
Published by Tenant Screening Background Check
Established 2004 · 20+ Years · All U.S. States & Territories · Statute-Based · Attorney-Reviewed
A Private Eye Reports™ service trusted by landlords, property managers, and attorneys.
