Free Maryland Lease Extension Agreement

A lease extension is an agreement to carry an existing tenancy into a further term. It continues the existing lease rather than replacing it with a new one — that is the usual distinction between an extension and a renewal — though leases and statutes often use the two words for the same thing, so what governs is what the document in front of you actually says. Whether one is available at all is a matter of contract — nothing in the captured Maryland sections gives a tenant a right to renew, so the lease decides. What Maryland law supplies is the machinery around the decision: a written notice of intent to terminate with periods set by the kind of tenancy, a second and shorter ladder where the landlord has received a notice of intent to foreclose, a floor on the damages a holdover costs, a pair of provisions that stop a lease loading the notice burden onto the tenant, and a formality requirement in § 8-208(e) that decides whether an automatic-renewal clause is enforceable by the landlord at all.

Fill in the fields below and the generator produces a clean, dated PDF that the landlord and every tenant can sign and keep a copy of. Nothing is stored and there is no charge. Fields you leave blank print as a dash so you can complete them by hand.

Watch: Free Maryland Lease Extension Agreement explained

▶ Watch overview

This document records that an existing tenancy is continuing, on what terms, and for how long. It amends the lease rather than replacing it, so every term the parties do not change carries forward unchanged. In Maryland it is also the cleanest way to close off the notice question before it arises. Section 8-402(c) makes the end of a stated term a moment that calls for written notice unless a renewal has taken its place, and § 8-402(a) puts a statutory floor under the damages a holdover costs. A signed renewal removes both from the table — and it sidesteps the § 8-208(e) question altogether, because a term the parties have signed for does not depend on an automatic-renewal clause being enforceable.

• The parties, exactly as they are named on the lease being renewed.
• The property, including the unit number.
• The date the original lease was signed and the date its term ends.
• Which kind of tenancy this is – a stated term, month-to-month, week-to-week or year-to-year.
• Whether either side has given written notice of intent to terminate, and on what date.
• The notice the lease requires from the tenant, and the notice it requires from the landlord.
• Whether the lease being renewed contains an automatic-renewal clause and, if it does, whether that clause is set apart from the rest of the lease and carries the tenant’s initials, signature or witnessed mark – the section 8-208(e) test.
• The new term – its start date, and its end date if it is a fixed term.
• The rent for the new term, and whether it has changed.
• Every other term that is changing, and a statement that the rest continue unchanged.
• What happens to the deposit already held.

• Assuming a fixed term needs no notice because it has an end date. Section 8-402(c)(1) applies “to all cases of tenancies at the expiration of a stated term”.
• Using one notice period for every tenancy. The period follows the category — 60, 90, 180, 7 or 21 days.
• Relying on the tenant’s notice to excuse the landlord’s, in Baltimore City. Section 8-402(c)(3)(ii) says “This paragraph shall not apply in Baltimore City.” The parol-notice escape in (c)(3)(i) is simply unavailable there, so a Baltimore City landlord still owes the (c)(2) written notice even where the tenant has given notice of an intention to leave.
• Missing the second ladder in section 8-402(c)(4). Where the landlord has received a notice of intent to foreclose under § 7-105.1(c)(1) and desires to terminate, the notice is at least 30 days for month-to-month or week-to-week and at least 60 days for year to year — and (c)(4)(i) excludes property in Baltimore City or Montgomery County, property of a landlord offering 5 or more residential dwelling units for rent in the State, and property subject to an order to docket.
• Treating an automatic-renewal clause as self-executing. Section 8-208(e)(2) makes such a provision unenforceable by the landlord unless it is specifically accompanied by the tenant’s initials, signature or witnessed mark, and (e)(1) requires it to be distinctly set apart from any other provision of the lease.
• Writing a lease that demands more notice from the tenant than from the landlord. Section 8-501 prohibits exactly that. The reverse is not prohibited.
• Shortening the landlord’s notice to quit in the lease. Section 8-208(d)(5) bars a provision having the tenant agree to a period for the landlord’s notice to quit shorter than applicable law, while expressly permitting a longer one.
• Treating holdover damages as capped at the rent. Section 8-402(a)(2) makes the apportioned rent a minimum, and (a)(4) preserves other remedies.
• Relying on an oral notice from the tenant without a record. Section 8-402(c)(3)(i) permits parol notice but requires the landlord to prove it by competent testimony.

Nothing in the captured Maryland sections gives a tenant a right to renew, so whether a renewal is available depends on what the lease says. But Maryland does not leave the lease entirely to itself on the point: where the lease contains a clause that renews the term by itself, § 8-208(e) sets a formality the clause has to satisfy before the landlord can enforce it. And what Maryland supplies in unusual detail is the notice machinery around the end of a tenancy — including the end of a fixed term.

Real Prop. § 8-402(c)(1) sets out what it covers, and the first item is the one to notice: it applies “to all cases of tenancies at the expiration of a stated term, tenancies from year to year, tenancies from month to month, and tenancies from week to week”.

Under (c)(2), a landlord shall provide written notice of the intent to terminate a tenancy, and the period depends on the category:

• 60 days — a written lease for a stated term in excess of one week, or a month-to-month tenancy.
• 90 days before the end of the current year — a year-to-year tenancy, including a tobacco farm tenancy but excluding other farm tenancies.
• 180 days — other farm tenancies from year to year.
• 7 days — week-to-week, where there is a written lease.
• 21 days — week-to-week, where there is not.

Two exceptions qualify that ladder, and (c)(2) opens by naming them: it applies “Except as provided in paragraphs (3) and (4) of this subsection”. Paragraph (3) is the tenant’s-notice route below. Paragraph (4)(ii) substitutes a different ladder where the landlord has received a notice of intent to foreclose under § 7-105.1(c)(1) and desires to terminate: at least 30 days before expiration for a month-to-month or week-to-week tenancy, and at least 60 days for year to year — subject to its own exclusions in (4)(i), which are property in Baltimore City or Montgomery County, property owned by a landlord who offers 5 or more residential dwelling units for rent in the State, and property subject to an order to docket under § 7-105.1(e).

The practical consequence is that in Maryland the end of a fixed term is not self-executing: § 8-402(c) still calls for notice. A landlord who intends the tenancy to end when the stated term expires is inside § 8-402(c), and the sixty days runs before that expiration — which means the decision has to be taken two months out, not on the last afternoon.

One captured provision speaks directly to renewal, and it is easy to miss because it sits in a section about lease terms generally.

§ 8-208(e)(1): except for a lease containing an automatic renewal period of 1 month or less, a lease that contains a provision calling for an automatic renewal of the lease term “unless prior notice is given by the party or parties seeking to terminate the lease” shall have the provision distinctly set apart from any other provision of the lease and provide a space for the written acknowledgment of the tenant’s agreement to the automatic renewal provision.

And (e)(2) supplies the consequence: an automatic renewal provision that is not specifically accompanied by either the tenant’s initials, signature, or witnessed mark is unenforceable by the landlord.

So a Maryland automatic-renewal clause buried in the body of a lease, with nothing beside it to show the tenant agreed to that clause in particular, is on the face of the subsection one the landlord cannot enforce. If your lease has such a clause, look for the separate acknowledgment before assuming the term rolls over. The cleanest answer, and the reason this page exists, is not to depend on the clause at all: a signed extension agreement states the new term outright.

Section 8-402(c)(3)(i) provides the exception. Where the tenant gives notice — and the subsection expressly permits it to be given by parol — at least thirty days before the expiration of the term of the tenancy (ninety days in the case of a year-to-year tenancy, one hundred eighty days for a farm tenancy) of an intention to remove and surrender possession, and the landlord proves that notice by competent testimony, the landlord need not give the written notice and may still recover possession.

This escape does not exist in Baltimore City. The paragraph carries its own territorial limit in § 8-402(c)(3)(ii): “This paragraph shall not apply in Baltimore City.” The exclusion is of the whole of paragraph (3), not of some part of it, so in Baltimore City there is no parol-notice route and no competent-testimony route. A Baltimore City landlord who has heard from the tenant — orally or in writing — that the tenant intends to leave at the end of the term still owes the written notice of intent to terminate under (c)(2), on the same 60, 90, 180, 7 or 21 day timetable as anyone else. This is the single easiest way to read the section wrongly, because (c)(3)(i) is long and (c)(3)(ii) is one line underneath it.

Two further points follow, outside Baltimore City. The statute genuinely allows an oral notice from the tenant, which is unusual. But the person who has to prove it is the landlord, by competent testimony, which is a much less comfortable position than holding a dated letter. Both sides are better served by writing it down even though the statute does not insist.

Section 8-402(a) deals with the tenant who stays. A tenant under any periodic tenancy, or at the expiration of a lease, and someone holding under the tenant, “who shall unlawfully hold over beyond the expiration of the lease or termination of the tenancy, shall be liable to the landlord for the actual damages caused by the holding over”.

Then (a)(2) adds the part that changes the arithmetic: those damages “may not be less than the apportioned rent for the period of holdover at the rate under the lease”. That is a minimum. It is not, as it is sometimes reported, a rule that a holdover tenant pays the rent and nothing more — and (a)(4) makes the point explicitly by preserving every other remedy available under the lease or applicable law.

So in Maryland the apportioned rent is the floor rather than the cap, and a tenant deciding whether to stay a fortnight past the end of a term should not treat a fortnight’s rent as the whole of the exposure. The figure the statute names is the least the award can be, not the most.

There is a separate question, and the same section answers it: what happens if the landlord simply lets the tenant stay. § 8-402(d) provides that, unless the written lease says otherwise and the tenant has initialled it, when a landlord consents to a holdover tenant remaining on the premises that tenant becomes a periodic week-to-week tenant if that is what they were before the holding over, and a periodic month-to-month tenant in all other cases. So if neither side acts and the landlord accepts the situation, a Maryland fixed term does not vanish into nothing and it does not silently repeat itself for another year — it converts to a month-to-month tenancy, which then carries the 60-day notice period of (c)(2)(i) at its own end.

Two provisions work together here, and read as a pair they are precise.

Section 8-208(d)(5) prohibits a lease provision having the tenant agree to a period for the landlord’s notice to quit that is shorter than applicable law, “except that the parties may agree to a longer notice period than that required by applicable law”. So the statutory periods are a floor that a lease may raise but not lower. Note what that subsection is and is not about: it is written around the period required for the landlord’s notice to quit. It is not a general rule about every notice period in the lease, and it says nothing about the tenant’s own notice obligation.

Section 8-501 then closes the other gap: “No written agreement between a landlord and tenant shall provide for a longer notice period to be furnished by the tenant to the landlord in order to terminate the tenancy than that required of the landlord to the tenant in order to terminate the tenancy.”

Together they mean a Maryland lease may lengthen the landlord’s notice to quit, but it may never require a longer period from the tenant than from the landlord. A clause requiring the tenant to give ninety days while the landlord gives sixty is the exact thing § 8-501 forbids. The reverse is not prohibited: requiring more of the landlord than of the tenant is lawful, because the section is a one-directional cap on the tenant’s period and not a symmetry rule. This is worth checking on any renewal, because the moment a lease is being amended is the moment such a clause is most likely to be introduced without anyone thinking about it.

A separate section handles the different situation where the term is still running and the tenant has breached. Where an unexpired lease for a stated term provides that the landlord may repossess on breach, § 8-402.1 allows the landlord to file where the tenant breaches and has had 30 days’ written notice of the violation and of the landlord’s desire to repossess, and refuses to comply.

The period drops to 14 days’ written notice on a narrower ground, and the subsection begins by saying whose behavior counts: “The breach of the lease involves behavior by a tenant or a person who is on the property with the tenant’s consent, which demonstrates a clear and imminent danger of the tenant or person doing serious harm to themselves, other tenants, the landlord, the landlord’s property or representatives, or any other person on the property” — and the landlord has given the tenant or person in possession that 14 days’ written notice. The “or person” in the danger clause is not loose drafting: it points back to the person on the property with the tenant’s consent, named at the start of the same limb.

This is not a renewal provision, but it is worth knowing which section you are in. Section 8-402 is about tenancies ending at their natural end; § 8-402.1 is about a term that has not reached its end at all.

The captured Maryland material for this page is a set of Real Property sections including § 8-402, § 8-402.1, § 8-208 and § 8-501. It is not the whole title.

Two questions were not researched for this page and are not answered here.

The first is whether a Maryland landlord needs a reason to decline a renewal. No provision in the captured set states a good-cause or just-cause requirement, and none was searched for outside it. The nearest thing the capture holds is § 8-208(d)(8), which bars a lease provision permitting a landlord to commence an eviction proceeding or issue a notice to quit solely as retaliation against a tenant for planning, organizing or joining a tenant organization to negotiate collectively — a rule about what a lease may contain, not a general answer to the question.

The second is what notice a rent increase requires. The section Maryland uses for that, § 8-209, is not among the sections captured here, and the only mention of a rent increase anywhere in the capture is the cross-reference in § 8-208(d)(9), which bars a lease provision requiring the tenant to accept notice of rent increases under § 8-209 or § 8-401 by electronic delivery. So the capture establishes that a rent-increase notice regime exists and says nothing about its length.

In both cases the silence above is not evidence that Maryland has no rule. Local ordinances were not searched — Maryland counties and Baltimore City have their own landlord-tenant provisions — and no case law was consulted.

The sequence above covers the five steps that matter most. These follow from the same provisions and are worth doing in the same sitting.

• If either side has already given notice, write down the date. Both the landlord’s obligation under (c)(2) and its removal under (c)(3)(i) turn on when notice was given, and (c)(3)(i) puts the burden of proving the tenant’s notice on the landlord. In Baltimore City paragraph (c)(3) does not apply at all, so the landlord’s written notice is still required.

An extension is mostly a matter of contract, so what it can do is decided by the existing lease before it is decided by statute. The place state law bites hardest is the rent, because continuing a tenancy is when it usually changes. Our guide to Maryland rent increase laws sets out the notice that has to come first, which is often the real deadline in that negotiation.

The second place is what happens when the parties do not agree. An expiring term does not resolve itself, and Maryland eviction notice laws explain the notices and timelines that follow if a tenant stays on without a new agreement.

For the obligations that run between a landlord and a tenant throughout the tenancy, and the rules that apply to both sides, see Maryland landlord tenant laws.

Published by Tenant Screening Background Check

Established 2004 · 20+ Years · All U.S. States & Territories · Statute-Based · Attorney-Reviewed

A Private Eye Reports™ service trusted by landlords, property managers, and attorneys.