Free Alaska Security Deposit Return Letter

An Alaska Security Deposit Return Letter is the written accounting a landlord mails with the deposit refund at the end of a tenancy. Under Alaska Stat. Section 34.03.070, the landlord must mail this letter with the refund — or with a written itemized list of deductions — within fourteen days of termination and delivery of possession, or thirty days where the landlord deducts for tenant-caused damages or the tenant did not give proper notice. Deliver it late or without itemizing, and subsection (d) exposes a landlord who wilfully withholds to double the amount wrongfully withheld.

Complete the builder below to generate a state-compliant Alaska Security Deposit Return Letter, ready to print, sign, and send by certified mail. Enter the original deposit, itemize each deduction, and the generator subtracts the deductions from the deposit to compute the refund balance automatically — both live on the page and in the downloaded PDF. Fill every line specifically; a vague itemization is what fuels most Alaska deposit disputes.

Watch: Alaska Security Deposit Return Letter explained

▶ Watch overview

An Alaska Security Deposit Return Letter is the written accounting a landlord delivers to a departing tenant along with the deposit refund, or along with an itemized statement of any lawful deductions. It is a letter, not a served court notice, but Alaska law gives it teeth: the timing and content of its delivery decide whether the landlord keeps or forfeits the money at stake. Under Alaska Stat. Section 34.03.070, the landlord must mail the written notice and refund to the tenant within a fixed window measured from termination of the tenancy and delivery of possession. That window is the spine of the entire section.

The length of the window turns on two facts. Under subsection (g), if the landlord or tenant gives notice that complies with AS 34.03.290 — the statute governing periodic-tenancy termination notice — the landlord has fourteen days after the tenancy is terminated and possession is delivered to mail the notice and refund. That fourteen-day window stretches to thirty days when the landlord deducts costs for damages suffered because of the tenant’s noncompliance with AS 34.03.120. And when the tenant does not give notice complying with AS 34.03.290 — or the landlord becomes aware the unit is abandoned — the deadline is thirty days regardless. Because the fourteen-day track is narrow, the safest habit is to date-stamp both termination and delivery of possession, confirm whether proper notice was given, and mail well before the applicable deadline.

When a landlord applies any part of the deposit to accrued rent or damages, Alaska Stat. 34.03.070(b) requires that the accrued rent and damages be itemized by the landlord in a written notice mailed to the tenant’s last known address within the time limit set by subsection (g). The itemization is not a courtesy; it is the statutory condition of lawfully keeping any money. Vague, lump-sum entries invite dispute and are routinely reduced or rejected in Alaska district court. Each line should name what was damaged or cleaned, why the charge was necessary, and the amount, and each should be backed by a receipt, invoice, or dated move-out photograph.

Subsection (b) also frames what may be deducted at all: the deposit may be applied to the payment of accrued rent and to the amount of damages the landlord has suffered by reason of the tenant’s noncompliance with AS 34.03.120 — the tenant’s core obligations to keep the unit clean and to avoid deliberate or negligent damage. In practice that means unpaid rent, repair of tenant-caused damage beyond ordinary wear and tear, and reasonable cleaning to return the unit to its move-in condition. The generator above produces the deposit accounting exactly in this order: original deposit plus any interest, minus the itemized deductions, equals the refund balance owed.

Alaska’s deduction rule is narrow by design. Subsection (b) permits the deposit to be applied only to accrued rent and to damages from the tenant’s noncompliance with AS 34.03.120. Ordinary wear and tear is not noncompliance — it is the gradual aging every rental undergoes regardless of who lives there. Faded paint, minor scuffs, carpet flattened along a normal traffic path, and small nail holes from hanging pictures are classic wear and tear. They are the cost of doing business as a landlord, not a chargeable loss, and Alaska landlords who deduct for them are withholding money the statute does not allow.

Damage is different. Deterioration caused by the tenant’s deliberate or negligent conduct, or by a guest or occupant, may be charged — a cigarette burn in the carpet, a hole punched in drywall, a broken window, or pet urine soaked into the subfloor. The dividing line matters because a landlord who dresses up ordinary wear as damage and deducts for it is not only withholding unlawfully but also feeding the wilful-withholding analysis that triggers double damages under subsection (d). When a line item is genuinely a judgment call, prorate for the item’s useful life and document the reasoning in the letter rather than charging the full replacement cost.

Alaska’s enforcement mechanism sits in subsection (d): if the landlord wilfully fails to comply with the return-and-itemization duty in subsection (b), the tenant may recover an amount not to exceed twice the actual amount wrongfully withheld. Read that arithmetic carefully — the tenant can recover the wrongfully held deposit itself and, on top of it, an equal amount as a penalty, so a landlord who keeps money he was not entitled to keep can end up owing roughly double once the penalty is stacked. The word wilfully is the hinge: an honest, documented, timely accounting is not a wilful violation, while ignoring the deadline or padding deductions with wear-and-tear charges is exactly the conduct the penalty targets.

The related duty in subsection (c) reinforces why sound deposit handling matters from day one. All money paid to the landlord as prepaid rent or as a security deposit must be promptly deposited, wherever practicable, in a trust account in a bank, savings and loan association, or with a licensed escrow agent. Treating the deposit as trust money — not operating cash — keeps the funds available to refund on time and reinforces the good-faith posture that defeats a double-damages claim. For guidance on the broader framework, see the comprehensive Alaska security deposit laws guide, and prepare the upstream documentation with the Alaska Move-In / Move-Out Inspection Checklist.

Because the length of the deadline depends on how the tenancy ended, Alaska landlords need a clear, dated record of both termination and the notice that preceded it. Termination occurs when the tenancy legally ends — by the expiration of a fixed term, by proper notice under AS 34.03.290, or by other lawful means — and the clock in subsection (g) does not begin until possession has actually been delivered. The safest practice is to fix the delivery-of-possession date the moment keys are returned and to confirm it in writing to the tenant, so there is no later dispute about when the window opened.

The AS 34.03.290 notice is what decides the fourteen-versus-thirty question on the no-deduction track. Alaska’s periodic-tenancy rules generally require thirty days’ written notice before the rental due date to end a month-to-month tenancy, with a shorter period for a week-to-week tenancy. When that proper notice is given and the landlord is not deducting for damage, the fourteen-day return window applies. When no proper notice was given, or when the landlord is deducting for damages the tenant caused, the thirty-day window applies. A landlord who is unsure which track governs should treat the thirty-day deadline as the outer limit and still aim to mail the accounting as early as the documentation allows.

Landlords should also remember that the deposit is trust money throughout. Under subsection (c) it should sit, wherever practicable, in a separate trust account rather than in operating funds, and it should not be commingled with the landlord’s own money. Keeping the deposit segregated is not merely good bookkeeping; it means the exact funds are on hand to refund within the statutory window, which is itself evidence of the good faith that defeats a double-damages claim.

The strength of an Alaska return letter rises and falls on its documentation. For every deduction, keep the underlying proof: a contractor invoice, a store receipt for materials, a cleaning company bill, or dated photographs showing the damage next to the move-in condition. A well-run file pairs each line item on the letter with a corresponding exhibit, so that if the tenant sues, the landlord can show the deduction was a real, quantified, tenant-caused cost rather than an estimate or a disguised wear-and-tear charge.

When a tenant disputes a deduction, respond in writing and reference the specific line item and its supporting document. Many disputes evaporate once the tenant sees the receipt and the photo. Where a charge is a genuine judgment call — a carpet with three years of life left, replaced after five years of use — proration protects the landlord: charge only the depreciated value attributable to the tenant’s damage, and explain the calculation. Courts and tenants both respond better to a transparent, prorated number than to a full-replacement demand that ignores the item’s age. Because subsection (d) puts double-damages exposure on the table for a wilful violation, the economics almost always favor a documented, reasonable accounting over an aggressive one that a court may later find was made in bad faith.

<