Free Delaware Rental Application Fee Receipt

Delaware is one of the states most often described as having no rental application fee rule, and the description is simply wrong. The rule exists, it is specific, and it carries a double-damages remedy — on a letting the Residential Landlord-Tenant Code governs, which is the first thing to establish and the subject of the last section on this page. What makes Delaware genuinely different from other capped states is that the cap is not one number in one place. Section 5514(d) of title 25 permits a creditworthiness application fee up to the greater of ten percent of the monthly rent or fifty dollars, which sounds generous and, on a higher-rent unit, sounds like real money. Section 5310 then forbids a prospective landlord charging more than the specific cost of any credit or other investigation. Both provisions apply to the same fee. Neither is a ceiling the other lifts. The consequence is that the amount you may lawfully take on a particular application is the lower of the two figures, and for most Delaware landlords screening a normal unit through a normal vendor, the number that binds is the one nobody quotes: what the screening actually cost. Around that sit duties that are easy to comply with and easy to forget — a receipt furnished when the fee is taken, complete records of all application fees kept at least two years, each application record retained six months, no assurance money, and no nonrefundable fee demanded as a condition of occupancy. Get the arithmetic wrong and the tenant is entitled to double what you charged, which turns a small overcharge into a claim worth pursuing. One thing precedes all of it. Both sections belong to the Residential Landlord-Tenant Code, and chapter 51 subchapter I gates the whole Code: § 5101(b) excludes any rental agreement for a commercial rental unit, and § 5102 puts six arrangements outside the Code unless they were created solely to avoid it — institutional residence incidental to detention or care, which expressly includes college or school student housing; a fraternal organization’s own member; a hotel, motel or cubicle hotel; a nonrenewable agreement of 120 days or less for a dwelling in one of five named coastal Hundreds; a ground rental where the tenant owns the improvements; and a certified recovery house. On an ordinary residential letting everything below applies exactly as stated; whether yours is one is a question of fact this page cannot decide for you.

Fill in the fields below and the generator produces a dated PDF you can print, sign and give to the applicant, keeping a copy for your file. Nothing is stored and there is no charge. Fields you leave blank print as a dash so you can complete them by hand.

Watch: Delaware Rental Application Fee Receipt explained

▶ Watch overview

The generator above produces the receipt § 5514 requires you to furnish when you take an application fee, together with the record that makes the two-ceiling comparison provable. Delaware prescribes no form, so this is not a statutory form and is not captioned as one. It records the parties and the unit, the monthly rent the ten percent branch was calculated against, the § 5514(d) figure that produced, the specific cost of the investigation and the vendor it came from, and the amount actually taken as the lower of the two. It also carries the date the fee was received, which is what starts both retention clocks. And one thing it assumes. It is written for a letting the Residential Landlord-Tenant Code governs; § 5101(b) excludes commercial lettings and § 5102 excludes six arrangements from that Code, and the record does not ask which yours is, because that is a question of fact about the property rather than a field. Nothing is stored and there is no charge. Fields left blank print as a dash.

• That your letting is one the Residential Landlord-Tenant Code governs. § 5101(b) excludes any rental agreement for a commercial rental unit, and § 5102 excludes six arrangements from the Code unless created solely to avoid it — college or school student housing, hotel and motel lodging, and a nonrenewable agreement of 120 days or less in the five named coastal Hundreds among them.
• A receipt furnished when the fee was received. § 5514 ties the duty to the moment of receipt, so a receipt issued weeks later is late even if it is accurate.
• The § 5514(d) figure you calculated. Ten percent of the monthly rent or fifty dollars, whichever is greater, worked out for that particular unit.
• The specific cost of the credit or other investigation. The vendor invoice is what answers § 5310, and for most landlords it is the limit that actually binds.
• That the amount charged was the lower of the two. This is the comparison the whole rule turns on, and it should be visible on the record rather than reconstructed.
• Complete records of all application fees for at least two years. The § 5514 clock, and it covers all application fees, not only the ones that led to a tenancy.
• Each application record retained for six months. The separate § 5310 clock, enforced through the Consumer Protection Unit.
• That no assurance money was taken. § 5310 bars it outright for a prospective landlord, whatever the money is called.
• That no nonrefundable fee was required as a condition of occupancy. The § 5311 point, and it is separate from the application fee cap.
• Your adverse-action record where a report drove a rejection. Federal consumer report law applies alongside the Delaware sections and was not displaced by them.
• A note of any local requirement you are also meeting. Municipal and county rules were not researched for this page, and no Delaware case law was researched for it either.

• Charging ten percent of the rent because § 5514(d) appears to allow it. § 5310 caps the same fee at the specific cost of the investigation, so on a high-rent unit the formula figure is well above what you may actually take. This is the single most common Delaware error and it is built into most published summaries.
• Reporting that Delaware has no application fee rule. It comes from searching chapter 51, hitting 404s where further subchapters would be, and stopping. The rule is in chapter 55.
• Treating the fifty-dollar branch as a flat statewide cap. It is the floor of a greater-of formula, not the whole rule; on a higher-rent unit the ten percent branch is the § 5514(d) figure, and the cost limit still sits on top of both.
• Using one house figure across a whole portfolio. The ten percent branch is keyed to the monthly rent of the unit, so a single number applied everywhere will be too high on the cheaper units.
• Issuing the receipt when the application is decided. The duty attaches on receipt of the fee, which is earlier and is the point at which the applicant needs the record.
• Keeping records for six months and assuming that is enough. That is the § 5310 clock. § 5514 asks for complete records of all application fees for at least two years, and keeping the longer period satisfies both.
• Taking money to hold or reserve a unit. § 5310 bars a prospective landlord taking assurance money, and calling it an application fee does not convert it into one.
• Requiring a nonrefundable fee as a condition of getting the unit. § 5311 addresses that directly, and it is a separate problem from an overcharge.
• Underestimating the remedy. An overcharge entitles the tenant to double the amount charged, so a modest excess collected across several applicants is not a rounding error.
• Assuming the Code reaches every letting you run. § 5101(b) excludes a commercial rental agreement, and § 5102 puts six arrangements outside the Code — institutional residence incidental to detention or care, expressly including college or school student housing; a fraternal organization’s own member; a hotel, motel or cubicle hotel; a nonrenewable agreement of 120 days or less for a dwelling in Broadkill, Lewes-Rehoboth, Indian River, Baltimore or Cedar Creek Hundred; a ground rental where the tenant owns the improvements; and a certified recovery house. That does not weaken the two ceilings on a letting the Code covers; it means the classification question comes first. The same trap runs the other way: an arrangement created solely to avoid the Code’s application is not excluded by § 5102 at all.
• Dating the cap. The history line names two session laws without saying which inserted subsection (d), so guidance that tells you the year the cap was introduced is asserting something the printed history does not establish.

Two ceilings apply to the same fee and the lower one binds. Under 25 Del. C. § 5514(d) a landlord may charge a creditworthiness application fee not exceeding the greater of ten percent of the monthly rent or fifty dollars. Under 25 Del. C. § 5310 a prospective landlord may not charge more than the specific cost of any credit or other investigation. Neither section displaces the other, so the operative maximum on a given application is whichever of those two numbers is smaller.

That is the answer, and it is not the answer most Delaware guidance gives. The overwhelming majority of summaries quote § 5514(d) on its own, which produces a figure that rises with the rent and looks like an entitlement. It is a boundary, not an entitlement, and there is a second boundary underneath it.

One boundary belongs on both ceilings, and it comes before either of them. § 5514 and § 5310 are sections of the Residential Landlord-Tenant Code, and chapter 51 subchapter I holds the gate on the whole of it. § 5101, captioned “Applicability of Code”, makes the Code regulate all legal rights, remedies and obligations of all parties to any rental agreement of a rental unit within this State, wherever executed — and excludes any rental agreement for a commercial rental unit, which is governed by general contract principles instead. § 5102, captioned “Exclusions from application of this Code”, then puts six arrangements outside it “unless created solely to avoid such application”: institutional residence merely incidental to detention or to medical, geriatric, educational, counseling, religious or similar services, which the section says expressly includes prisons, student housing provided by a college or school, old-age homes, nursing homes, monasteries, nunneries and hospitals; residence by a member of a fraternal organization in a structure operated for its benefit; residence in a hotel, motel, cubicle hotel or other similar lodgings; nonrenewable rental agreements of 120 days or less for any calendar year for a dwelling within “Broadkill Hundred, Lewes-Rehoboth Hundred, Indian River Hundred, Baltimore Hundred and Cedar Creek Hundred”; a rental of ground on which the tenant built or installed the dwelling and retains ownership or title to it; and a certified recovery house.

Two of those matter commercially rather than theoretically. The fourth is the Delaware beach rental market — a short-season letting in one of the five named coastal Hundreds, on a nonrenewable agreement of 120 days or less, is on the face of the section outside the Code altogether. The first names college or school student housing in terms. Note also that § 5102 speaks of this Code rather than this chapter, so it gates § 5514 in chapter 55 and § 5310 in chapter 53 alike.

Read that as a gate, not as a doubt. Where your letting is one the Code governs, both ceilings below apply exactly as stated. Where it is one of the exclusions, the Code does not reach the arrangement at all, and whatever law does is not described here. And the exclusion is not a device: the opening words of § 5102 take an arrangement created solely to avoid the Code’s application back inside it. Which side of the line a particular letting falls on is a question of fact — whether an agreement is genuinely nonrenewable, where the dwelling sits, how the lodging is actually run — and it is not one this page can settle for you.

Because screening costs do not scale with rent. A credit report and a screening product cost roughly the same whether the unit rents for six hundred dollars or two thousand six hundred. The § 5514(d) branch moves with the rent; the § 5310 limit does not move at all. So the more expensive the unit, the wider the gap between the formula figure and the cost figure, and the wider that gap the more likely a landlord relying on the formula is charging more than § 5310 permits.

Work it in both directions. On a unit at two thousand dollars a month, ten percent is two hundred dollars, so the § 5514(d) figure is two hundred; if the investigation cost thirty-five dollars, thirty-five is the cap. On a unit at four hundred dollars a month, ten percent is forty dollars, so the greater-of formula gives fifty; if the investigation cost forty-five dollars, forty-five is the cap, and if it cost sixty, fifty is the cap and the balance is simply not recoverable from the applicant. The exercise is the same each time: calculate both, charge the lower.

The practical upshot for a Delaware landlord running normal residential vacancies is that the vendor invoice is the working number and § 5514(d) is the outer wall you should rarely be anywhere near.

Yes. § 5514 requires the landlord to furnish a receipt on receipt of the fee. The timing is the part that gets missed: the duty attaches when the money is taken, not when the application is approved or refused, and not when the applicant asks. A receipt produced later may still be accurate but it was not furnished when the section says it should have been.

A receipt that records only a total is compliant on its face but weak in practice, because the whole Delaware rule turns on a comparison between two numbers. A receipt that also records the monthly rent the ten percent branch was calculated from, and the specific cost of the investigation the fee was set against, shows an adjudicator that the comparison was made at the time. That is the form this page generates.

There are two answers, from two sections, and they are different lengths. § 5514 requires complete records of all application fees to be kept for at least two years. § 5310 requires each application record to be retained for six months, with enforcement of that section running through the Consumer Protection Unit.

Two clocks from two provisions is unusual, and it is worth stating plainly which one comes from where rather than blending them into a single number. The operational answer is straightforward: keep everything for the longer of the two and both duties are satisfied without anyone having to track which document falls under which section. Note also that the § 5514 duty reaches all application fees, including fees taken from applicants who were never housed — those are precisely the files a landlord is most likely to discard early.

Overcharging entitles the tenant to double the amount charged. That is a meaningful remedy for a small sum, and it changes the risk arithmetic: a landlord who applies one convenient figure across a portfolio of units at different rents is not risking a refund of the excess, but double the fee, on every application where the figure was too high.

It is also why the record matters more than the money. The defence to an overcharge claim is the contemporaneous evidence that the fee was set at or below both ceilings — the rent, the formula result, the vendor invoice and the amount taken, all on one document dated the day the fee was received.

No. § 5310 bars a prospective landlord from taking assurance money. In substance that addresses money collected from an applicant to secure, reserve or hold a unit, or to assure that a tenancy will go ahead — money that is neither rent, nor a security deposit under the deposit rules, nor the cost of an investigation.

The label does not control. Recasting a holding payment as an application fee does not bring it within § 5514(d), because that subsection caps a fee charged for assessing creditworthiness — it is defined by what the fee is for, not by what it costs, which is why its ceiling is a formula on the rent rather than a cost test. The cost test is § 5310’s, and it limits the charge to what the investigation actually cost. If a payment is doing a job other than paying for screening, the application fee cap is not the provision that authorises it.

Relatedly, § 5311 addresses nonrefundable fees required as a condition of occupancy. It is a separate provision from the fee cap and it is worth checking against any charge in your application process that the applicant cannot get back.

Because of where the sections sit. Chapter 51 of title 25 contains only two subchapters. A researcher who assumes the Residential Landlord-Tenant Code is contained in chapter 51 and walks its subchapters in sequence gets 404s at the third and fifth, reads them as the end of the material, and concludes there is nothing further. In fact the Code continues in separate chapters 53, 55, 57 and 59, and § 5514 — the application fee section — is in chapter 55.

This is worth knowing beyond application fees, because the same mistake will hide other Delaware provisions from the same search. If a source tells you Delaware is silent on a landlord-tenant question, check whether it looked past chapter 51 before you rely on the silence.

There is an opposite error worth naming in the same breath, because it treats chapter 51 as if it contained nothing. The two subchapters it does have hold § 5101 and § 5102 — the sections that decide whether the Code reaches a given letting at all, and therefore whether § 5514 and § 5310 reach it. A researcher who walks into chapter 51, correctly notes how small it is and moves on to chapter 55 has passed the gate without reading it. The commercial exclusion is in § 5101(b); the six arrangements — student housing, fraternal organizations, hotels and similar lodgings, nonrenewable short-season coastal lettings, tenant-owned improvements on rented ground, and certified recovery houses — are in § 5102.

One further caution about sourcing, in the other direction. The history line printed with § 5514 names two session laws but does not indicate which of them inserted subsection (d). Guidance that tells you the ten percent or fifty dollar cap dates from a particular year is stating something the printed history does not establish, so this page describes the cap without dating it.

The fee pays for a screening decision, and the standards you apply to that decision are governed by their own rules — including the federal consumer report and adverse action requirements, which apply whatever Delaware says about the price of the report. Our guide to Delaware tenant screening laws covers what you may consider and what a denial requires.

An application fee is not a deposit, and the assurance money bar in § 5310 is one of the places the line is drawn. The money taken at signing runs on an entirely separate regime with its own limits and its own return clock — see Delaware security deposit laws.

For the wider framework, including notice periods, entry and termination, see Delaware landlord-tenant laws.

Published by Tenant Screening Background Check

Established 2004 · 20+ Years · All U.S. States & Territories · Statute-Based · Attorney-Reviewed

A Private Eye Reports™ service trusted by landlords, property managers, and attorneys.