Free Georgia Month-to-Month Rental Agreement

A Georgia month-to-month arrangement is what the Code calls a tenancy at will, and O.C.G.A. § 44-7-7 governs how it ends: sixty days’ notice from the landlord, thirty days’ notice from the tenant. The asymmetry is deliberate and it is the single most important thing to get right, because a landlord who gives thirty days has given half of what the statute requires. This builder produces a Georgia agreement that records both periods on the face of the document, so neither side has to remember which one is theirs.

Fill in the fields below and the generator produces a clean, dated PDF you can print, sign and keep with your records. Nothing is stored and there is no charge. Fields you leave blank print as a dash so you can complete them by hand.

Watch: Free Georgia Month-to-Month Rental Agreement explained

▶ Watch overview

In Georgia terminology, a rental arrangement with no fixed term is a tenancy at will, and that is the phrase § 44-7-7 uses. It carries all the ordinary terms of a tenancy — the premises, the parties, the rent and its due date, the deposit, utilities, pets, house rules — and simply leaves the ending open. Because the Code supplies so little procedure around ending one, the written agreement does more work in Georgia than in states with a detailed periodic-tenancy section: it is where the parties fix the notice address, the delivery method and the reminder that the two sides owe different periods. The generator above records the asymmetry explicitly rather than printing a single notice figure that would be wrong for one of the parties.

• The full names of the landlord and of every adult tenant
• The address of the premises, including the unit number
• The rent, the interval it covers, and the day of the month it falls due
• That the tenancy is a tenancy at will continuing until terminated by notice
• Both notice periods — sixty days from the landlord, thirty from the tenant — stated separately so neither is mistaken for the other
• The address each party sends notice to, since the Code does not supply one
• The method of delivery the parties will treat as effective
• The security deposit, where it is held, and what the tenant is told about its return
• Which utilities and services each party pays for
• The pet, smoking, guest and alteration rules

• A landlord giving thirty days. This is the error § 44-7-7 exists to prevent, and it is the most common one in Georgia. Thirty days is the tenant’s period. A landlord’s notice is sixty.
• Using a national month-to-month template unchanged. Almost every one of them prints a single notice figure, because almost every other state has one. On a Georgia form that single figure is wrong for one of the two parties.
• Relying on an oral notice. § 44-7-7 does not require writing, which sounds permissive and is not: it means there is no statutory form to fall back on and the whole question becomes one of evidence.
• Reading the annotations as if they were the statute. Published versions of § 44-7-7 carry pages of judicial-decision notes beneath a one-sentence section. Those notes are a publisher’s apparatus summarising cases, not the enacted text.
• Assuming the sixty days can be contracted down. The section states what is “necessary to terminate”. Bargaining for a longer period is a different question from writing a shorter one into a form and hoping it holds.

Sixty days if the landlord is ending it; thirty days if the tenant is. O.C.G.A. § 44-7-7 provides that “Sixty days’ notice from the landlord or 30 days’ notice from the tenant is necessary to terminate a tenancy at will.” That sentence is the whole of the operative provision. There is no subsection (a), no definition paragraph, and nothing setting out how the notice must be given.

Georgia is unusual in this. Most states that legislate a periodic-tenancy notice period set one number and apply it to both sides — Arizona’s § 33-1375 and Ohio’s R.C. § 5321.17 both do exactly that. Georgia deliberately weights the obligation towards the landlord, and the practical consequence is that a Georgia landlord cannot safely copy a notice period from anywhere else.

It is the Code’s name for a tenancy with no fixed end date — the arrangement most people call month-to-month. The heading of § 44-7-7 is “Notice required for termination of a tenancy at will”, and that is the label a Georgia agreement should use, because it is the label the statute uses.

The terminology matters when you go looking for the rest of the law. Searching Georgia’s Code for “month-to-month” will find far less than searching for the phrase the legislature actually adopted, and a form headed with the wrong term makes it harder for either party to confirm what applies to them.

§ 44-7-7 does not say so. That is a genuine silence and it should be read as one — this page is not going to tell you the Code requires something it does not. But the silence cuts against whoever is relying on the notice, not in their favour.

If a landlord asserts that sixty days’ notice was given orally in June and the tenant remembers a conversation in July, there is no statutory form, no prescribed method and no required content to test the claim against. The whole question collapses into which account a court finds more credible. A dated letter, delivered in a way that produces a record, removes the argument entirely. This is one of the places where good practice runs ahead of the statutory minimum, and the agreement is where the parties can commit to it in advance by fixing a notice address and a delivery method they both accept.

A tenancy at will can end sixty days after a landlord’s notice, or thirty after a tenant’s, from any point in the year, which means the deposit accounting can fall due at a time nobody planned for. On a fixed-term lease both parties see the end date coming for months; on a tenancy at will the notice is the first warning, and the obligations that follow the ending arrive on the same short timetable.

We have not printed Georgia’s deposit deadline on this page, because that is a separate provision from § 44-7-7 and it deserves to be read in full rather than summarised in a line — see Georgia security deposit laws. What the agreement can do is record the deposit amount, where it is held and what the tenant has been told, so that when the tenancy ends the only open question is the condition of the premises.

Notice periods end tenancies; they do not remove people. If the termination date passes and the tenant is still in the premises, the landlord’s route is the dispossessory process, not self-help — and that process asks its own questions about what notice was given and when. A defective § 44-7-7 notice is therefore not a small paperwork problem: it is the foundation the later proceeding stands on.

Our guide to Georgia eviction notice laws covers the notices that follow. The order matters — the termination notice comes first, and it has to be the right length for the party giving it.

A periodic tenancy is the arrangement where rent changes most often, because there is no fixed term holding the number still. The notice a rent change takes is a separate question from the notice that ends the tenancy, and the two are easily confused — so they are worth reading together. Our guide to Georgia rent increase laws covers how a rent change works on a periodic tenancy here.

The deposit is the other thing a month-to-month tenancy makes harder, because the tenancy can end on short notice and the clock for returning the money starts running the moment it does. Georgia security deposit laws cover what a landlord may deduct and the deadline for accounting for the rest — a deadline that is easy to miss when a tenancy can end at any point in the year rather than at the end of a lease term.

If the notice is ignored, ending a tenancy stops being a paperwork question and becomes a court one. Georgia eviction notice laws set out the notices that come next and how they must be served. A termination notice and an eviction notice are different documents doing different jobs, and serving the wrong one is one of the more common ways a straightforward ending turns into a contested case.

Published by Tenant Screening Background Check

Established 2004 · 20+ Years · All U.S. States & Territories · Statute-Based · Attorney-Reviewed

A Private Eye Reports™ service trusted by landlords, property managers, and attorneys.