▶

Free Kentucky Security Deposit Itemization (Auto-Calc PDF)

▶ Watch overview

Separate account, written itemized list, no wear and tear — the written itemized list of damages a Kentucky landlord must furnish under Ky. Rev. Stat. §383.580 before applying any part of the deposit. It adds up your deductions, subtracts them from the deposit, and writes the refund or balance straight into the PDF.

Ky. Rev. Stat. §383.580 KY URLTA Auto-Calc Refund Free PDF

A Kentucky security deposit itemization is the written itemized list of damages that Ky. Rev. Stat. §383.580 requires a landlord to furnish before applying any part of a tenant’s deposit. Kentucky’s rule is built on a process rather than a single flat deadline: the landlord holds the deposit in a separate account whose location was disclosed, provides a written itemized list of the damages, and gives the tenant a chance to inspect and respond before the money is applied. A landlord who skips those steps forfeits the right to withhold and must return the deposit. The generator below does the arithmetic: enter the deposit and each deduction, and it totals them, subtracts, and prints a ready-to-sign statement. One caution unique to Kentucky — §383.580 lives in the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, which applies only where a city or county has adopted it, so confirm coverage first, verify the current text at the Kentucky Legislature, and pair this with the Kentucky return letter that transmits it.

The itemization is one equation wrapped in a statutory process. You begin with the original security deposit the tenant paid — which in Kentucky must have been held in a separate account whose location was disclosed to the tenant under Ky. Rev. Stat. §383.580(1). From that figure you subtract every lawful deduction, each listed on its own line with a description and a dollar amount. What remains is the refund you enclose. If the deductions add up to more than the deposit, the equation goes negative and the statement instead shows the balance the tenant owes you. This document is the heart of Kentucky deposit compliance: the statute does not merely say “explain yourself,” it requires a written itemized list of the damages for which the deposit is withheld, furnished before the money is applied.

What makes Kentucky distinctive is that it substitutes a notice-and-response process for the single flat return deadline many states use. Rather than “return within thirty days or pay a penalty,” §383.580 tells the landlord to give the tenant the written itemized list, let the tenant inspect and respond, and only then apply the deposit and mail any balance to the tenant’s last known address. The statute also builds in a separate-account and disclosure prerequisite that most states lack, and it makes the right to deduct contingent on following the whole procedure. The generator on this page handles the money side flawlessly: it sums the deduction lines as you type, subtracts, and prints matching numbers into the PDF, so the arithmetic on the page and on the statement never disagree.

Fill in the parties, the deposit, and one line for each deduction. As you type, the calculator at the bottom updates in real time; when you click generate, the same totals are written into a formatted Kentucky itemized statement you can print, sign, and mail. Every field below reaches the document, and the refund or balance is computed for you under Ky. Rev. Stat. §383.580. If you also want a cover letter to transmit it, use the companion Kentucky deposit return letter form.

Kentucky’s residential security deposit rules live in a single statute, Ky. Rev. Stat. §383.580, which is part of the state’s Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act. The section opens in subsection 1 with a requirement most states omit: the landlord must hold all security deposits in an account used only for that purpose, at a bank or lending institution regulated by Kentucky or the United States, and must disclose the location of that separate account to the tenant. That separate-account-and-disclosure rule is a precondition to keeping any of the money, not a formality — a landlord who commingles the deposit or never tells the tenant where it is held can lose the right to withhold at all.

The middle of the statute builds the itemization-and-response process. The landlord must give the tenant a written itemized list of the damages that the landlord intends to charge against the deposit, and the tenant has the right to inspect that list and the premises and to respond. Only after furnishing the itemized list and honoring that response opportunity may the landlord apply the deposit toward the listed amounts. This sequencing is the reason a lump-sum “we kept your deposit” letter fails in Kentucky: the statute demands the itemized list first, with a genuine chance for the tenant to contest it, before a single dollar is applied.

The statute then supplies timing mechanics for the common problem cases. Where a tenant has vacated owing rent and has not made a demand for return of the deposit, the landlord may apply the deposit to the amounts owed after thirty days. Where the landlord has notified the tenant of the deductions and the tenant has not responded within sixty days, the landlord may remove the remaining deposit and retain it. In both paths, any balance left after lawful deductions is sent to the tenant’s last known address. Finally, the statute supplies the enforcement teeth: a landlord who does not comply with the section — no separate account, no disclosure, no written itemized list — is not entitled to retain any portion of the deposit, and the tenant may recover it. Confirm the exact current text and your local coverage at the Kentucky Legislature.

Before any of §383.580’s protections matter, a Kentucky landlord or tenant has to answer a threshold question that does not arise in most states: has the local government adopted the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act? Kentucky did not enact the URLTA statewide. Instead, the act took effect only in cities, counties, and urban-county governments that opted in by local ordinance. In a jurisdiction that adopted the act, §383.580 controls the deposit — the separate account, the disclosure, the itemized list, the response window, and the forfeiture penalty all apply. In a jurisdiction that did not, the deposit is governed by the lease and ordinary common-law contract principles, and the statutory protections simply are not available.

The adopting jurisdictions include much of Kentucky’s population but far from all of its geography. Louisville/Jefferson County, Lexington-Fayette, Covington, Newport, Florence, Bowling Green, and Georgetown are commonly cited among the adopters, along with several other cities and counties. Because the list is a matter of local ordinance and can change, the only safe practice is to confirm coverage for the specific property before relying on the statute — a deduction that would be lawful in Louisville may be governed purely by the lease a few counties away. When you complete this itemization, treat the URLTA question as step zero: if the property is covered, follow §383.580 to the letter; if it is not, the lease terms and general contract law define what you may withhold and when you must return the balance.

Kentucky landlords often blur two documents that the statute treats differently. The itemization is the statutory instrument named in §383.580: the written itemized list of the damages for which the deposit is withheld. It is the accounting — each deduction on its own line with a description and a dollar figure, the deposit at the top, and the refund or balance at the bottom. A return letter, by contrast, is the cover correspondence that transmits the accounting: the salutation, the paragraph explaining what is enclosed, the signature. The statute mandates the first; the second is a courtesy that carries it.

In practice a landlord usually sends both, stapled together, which is why the two are easy to conflate. But they are not interchangeable. A “Dear Tenant” letter with a lump-sum figure and no line items does not satisfy the statute, because §383.580 demands the itemized list with a real chance for the tenant to inspect and respond, not a summary. Conversely, a bare list of deductions with no cover note still satisfies the itemization requirement, though most landlords prefer to add a short transmittal for clarity. This page builds the itemization itself — the document the statute actually requires — and you can pair it with the companion deposit refund cover letter when you want a formal cover page. Keeping them as two separate forms mirrors how a Kentucky judge will read your file: the itemized list is the compliance record; the letter is the envelope.

The line between a lawful Kentucky deduction and an unlawful one is the difference between damage and ordinary wear and tear. The statute authorizes charging the deposit for unpaid rent and for the cost of repairing harm the tenant caused — not upgrades, not routine turnover cleaning, and not the aging that happens even when a tenant is careful. The federal Department of Housing and Urban Development describes ordinary wear and tear as the deterioration that results from the intended, ordinary use of a dwelling; damage, by contrast, is harm from negligence, carelessness, accident, or abuse. Only the second category may appear on a Kentucky itemization.

A useful test is to ask whether the condition came from living in the unit or from misusing it. Carpet flattened along the path from the door to the sofa is wear; the same carpet with a bleach stain is damage. Kentucky courts, like courts elsewhere, also respect the depreciation idea behind HUD’s life-expectancy tables: if a carpet’s useful life is seven years and the tenant lived there five, the landlord cannot itemize a brand-new carpet, because most of that value was already used up by ordinary aging. When a line item is close to the wear-and-tear boundary, deduct conservatively and document thoroughly — because §383.580 conditions the right to deduct on compliance, an over-aggressive itemization is the fastest route to forfeiting the deposit.

It helps to watch the equation run once with real numbers under Kentucky law. Suppose a tenant of a Louisville apartment paid a security deposit of twelve hundred dollars, which the landlord held in a separate account at a Kentucky bank and disclosed the location of at move-in, exactly as §383.580(1) requires. No lease term or ordinance credited interest, so the interest field stays at zero. The starting pool the landlord is accounting for is therefore twelve hundred dollars, all of it the tenant’s money held under the statute until lawful deductions are applied.

At the move-out inspection the landlord finds three chargeable items. The tenant left one month of rent unpaid, which the lease pegs at seven hundred fifty dollars. A dog left urine stains that required professional carpet treatment, invoiced at two hundred twenty dollars. And a bedroom wall had several fist-sized holes that cost one hundred thirty dollars to patch and repaint. Faded paint elsewhere and a worn path in the hallway carpet were left off the list entirely, because those are ordinary wear and tear and charging for them would convert a lawful itemization into an unlawful one.

The three lawful deductions total eleven hundred dollars. Subtracting that from the twelve-hundred-dollar deposit leaves a refund of one hundred dollars owed back to the tenant, which the landlord encloses with the written itemized list and mails to the tenant’s forwarding address. Had the damage been worse — say a ruined subfloor pushing deductions past the deposit — the equation would have gone negative, and the statement would instead show a balance the tenant owes, with the same line-item detail and receipts behind it. The generator above produces exactly this arithmetic, whichever way it lands, and prints the matching figures into the PDF so the page and the statement never disagree.

The single most common reason a Kentucky deposit deduction fails in court is not that the charge was unfair — it is that the line item was too vague to defend. A judge reading an itemization is looking for three things on every line: a specific condition, a specific location, and a specific amount tied to a receipt. A line that reads “cleaning — three hundred dollars” invites the tenant to argue the unit was left broom-clean and the number was invented. A line that reads “Professional cleaning of kitchen and two bathrooms left with grease, soap scum, and mildew, per attached ABC Cleaning invoice dated March 3 — one hundred eighty-five dollars” tells the judge exactly what happened and what it cost.

Write each deduction as if the tenant will contest it, because the ones worth contesting usually get contested. Name the room, describe the condition in plain words, and anchor the amount to a document: an invoice, a receipt, a written estimate, or a labor log at a stated hourly rate. Where a deduction covers your own labor rather than a contractor’s bill, say so and state the hours and the rate, because a Kentucky court will scrutinize round numbers that look like guesses. Attach photographs keyed to each line, dated at move-out and, ideally, matched to a move-in photo of the same spot. The itemization the generator produces gives you the numbered structure; your job is to make the description on each line carry its own weight.

Because Kentucky uses a process instead of a single flat return deadline, the timing questions cluster around two specific fact patterns that §383.580 addresses directly. The first is the tenant who vacates owing rent and never demands the deposit back. Here the statute lets the landlord apply the deposit to the amounts owed after thirty days — a rule that keeps a departed, non-communicating tenant from tying the money up indefinitely. The thirty days give the tenant a window to surface and make a claim; if none comes, the landlord may proceed to apply the deposit against the rent and other lawful charges and then account for any balance.

The second pattern is the tenant who was notified of the deductions but goes silent. When the landlord has sent the tenant notice of the itemized deductions and the tenant does not respond within sixty days, the landlord may remove the remaining deposit from the separate account and retain it toward the itemized amounts. This is the mechanism that lets a diligent landlord close out the deposit even when the tenant will not engage with the accounting. Both rules share a common thread: they reward the landlord who followed the process — separate account, written itemized list, notice to the tenant — and they do nothing for the landlord who skipped those steps, because the right to apply or retain the deposit depends on having complied with the statute in the first place.

Kentucky’s most distinctive deposit rule is one many landlords learn about only after it costs them a deduction. Under §383.580(1), every landlord who holds a residential security deposit must keep it in an account used only for security deposits, at a bank or lending institution regulated by Kentucky or the United States, and must disclose the location of that account to the tenant. This is not merely a bookkeeping preference — it is a condition on the right to withhold. A landlord who mixes deposits into a general operating account, or who never tells the tenant where the money is held, has failed to comply with the statute, and that failure can defeat an otherwise reasonable deduction.

The practical takeaway is to get the account right at the start of the tenancy, not at move-out. Open a dedicated deposit account, disclose its location to the tenant in writing (the lease is the natural place), and keep each tenant’s deposit traceable within it. When you later build the itemization, you can certify on the statement that the deposit was held in a separate, disclosed account — a certification this form includes precisely because it is the first thing a Kentucky tenant’s advocate will probe. If the account and disclosure are clean, the itemization stands on solid ground; if they are not, even a perfectly documented list of damages may not save the deduction.

An itemization is only as strong as the evidence behind it, and Kentucky’s forfeiture rule makes weak evidence expensive. The backbone of a defensible file is a matched pair of records: a move-in condition report signed at the start of the tenancy and a move-out condition report from the final inspection. When the two are read side by side, each deduction on the statement corresponds to a documented change — a wall that was intact and is now holed, a carpet that was clean and is now stained. Without the move-in baseline, a tenant can plausibly claim the condition predated the tenancy, and a Kentucky judge has little to weigh against that claim.

Photographs are the second pillar, and their value depends on discipline rather than quantity. Date-stamp every photo, shoot the same locations at move-in and move-out, and capture wide shots that establish the room as well as close-ups that show the specific damage. Keep the contractor invoices, material receipts, and any written estimates that support each dollar figure, and if part of a deduction is your own labor, log the hours and the rate rather than writing a round number. Retain the whole package — signed statement, condition reports, photos, receipts, separate-account records, and proof of delivery — in the tenant’s file for the length of any limitations period, because a deposit dispute can surface months after move-out. A completed move-in and move-out inspection checklist is the simplest way to build the matched-pair record the itemization relies on, and screening applicants carefully with a thorough rental application up front reduces how often you ever reach a contested itemization.

Most deposit disputes involve one tenant, but the ones that go sideways often involve several. When two or more tenants share a Kentucky tenancy and a single deposit, the deposit is ordinarily treated as a joint fund: the landlord accounts for one deposit and owes one refund, and it is generally not the landlord’s job to split the refund among roommates according to who paid what. The prudent practice is to make the refund check payable jointly, or to follow whatever the lease specifies, and to send the single itemized statement to an address that reaches the tenants. Where roommates have scattered to different addresses, delivering to the last known address of the tenancy still moves the process forward even if the internal split is left for the roommates to sort out among themselves.

The forwarding address deserves its own attention because tenants frequently forget to leave one. Ask for a forwarding address in writing before move-out and record it, but if none arrives, deliver the itemization and any balance to the tenant’s last known address, which is often the rental unit itself. This matters in Kentucky because the statute’s timing rules are keyed to notice and response: a landlord who furnished the written itemized list and mailed notice to the last known address has done what the statute asks, and a tenant who later claims never to have received it has a weaker argument when the mailing is documented. Keep proof of every mailing, because the returned envelope is evidence that you tried to comply.

A Kentucky tenant who believes the itemization is wrong or the deposit was kept without following the statute is not without recourse. The everyday forum is small claims court, where deposit disputes are among the most common cases and where a tenant usually does not need a lawyer. What raises the stakes for a careless landlord is the statute’s structure: because §383.580 conditions the right to deduct on compliance with the whole process, a landlord who did not keep a separate account, did not disclose it, or did not furnish the written itemized list is not entitled to retain any portion of the deposit — and the tenant may recover it.

That makes Kentucky’s penalty a procedural forfeiture rather than a fixed multiplier: the landlord who cut corners can lose the right to keep even legitimately owed amounts, because the statute ties the substantive right to the procedural steps. A tenant weighing a claim should gather the lease, any written disclosure of the deposit account, the itemized list if one was provided, and evidence of the unit’s condition, and should read the current text and confirm URLTA coverage at the Kentucky Legislature and the broader Kentucky landlord-tenant laws. Because the exact application turns on the facts and on whether the property is in an adopting jurisdiction, a tenant with a substantial dispute, or a landlord assessing exposure, should consider consulting a Kentucky attorney.

The mechanics of a claim also reward the prepared landlord. A Kentucky deposit dispute usually lands in small claims court, where the tenant files, the landlord answers, and both sides bring their exhibits to a short hearing. What decides these cases is rarely a fine point of law — it is whose paperwork is more credible. A landlord who arrives with a written disclosure of the separate account, a signed itemization, matched move-in and move-out condition reports, dated photographs, receipts numbered to the line items, and proof of timely delivery presents a record the judge can follow line by line. A tenant arguing that the whole deposit was kept without cause has a much harder time when each deduction is documented and the statutory steps are visibly satisfied. Conversely, a landlord who shows up with a lump-sum figure, no separate-account proof, and no itemized list invites the court to find the withholding noncompliant and to order the deposit returned. The itemization this page builds is the centerpiece of that file, and the surrounding documentation is what makes it persuasive rather than merely tidy.

Most Kentucky deposit disputes trace back to a short list of avoidable errors. Reviewing them before you deliver the statement is the cheapest insurance available.

Two refinements separate a rushed Kentucky itemization from a defensible one. The first is interest. Kentucky’s deposit statute does not require a landlord to pay the tenant interest on a residential security deposit, so for most Kentucky tenancies the interest field on this form stays at zero. Where a written lease term or a local ordinance nonetheless promises the tenant interest, that promise is enforceable as a matter of contract or local law, and you would add the credited interest to the deposit before subtracting deductions. When in doubt, treat interest as owed to the tenant only if a document you signed or a local rule says so.

The second refinement is prorating for an item’s age. A Kentucky landlord cannot itemize a departing tenant the full price of a brand-new replacement for something already partway through its useful life, because the deduction is limited to repairing the tenant’s damage, not to betterment. HUD’s life-expectancy guidance is the common reference point: interior paint is often treated as lasting two or three years, plush carpet roughly five to seven, and larger appliances closer to ten. If a carpet with a seven-year life is damaged after five years of tenancy, only the remaining fraction of its value is fairly chargeable. Applying that proration signals good faith and keeps a deduction proportionate if the tenant challenges it in small claims court.

Security deposit rules vary widely from state to state, and Kentucky is an outlier in two respects. First, it substitutes a notice-and-response process for the single flat return deadline most states impose, keying its thirty-day and sixty-day rules to the tenant’s conduct rather than to a fixed clock that starts at move-out. Second, its protections are local-option: §383.580 applies only where the URLTA was adopted, so two otherwise-identical Kentucky rentals can be governed by entirely different rules depending on the county line between them. What Kentucky shares with the rest of the country is the core bargain — the deposit is the tenant’s money, deductible only for real damage and unpaid rent, and an accurate itemized accounting is the landlord’s best protection.

• Confirm URLTA coverage first. Verify the property is in an adopting city or county before relying on §383.580’s protections.
• Hold the deposit in a separate, disclosed account. Subsection 1 requires it, and skipping it can forfeit the right to withhold.
• Furnish the written itemized list before applying the deposit. Give the tenant a real chance to inspect and respond.
• Deduct only damage beyond ordinary wear. Unpaid rent and tenant-caused damage — never faded paint or a worn path.
• Photograph at move-in and move-out. Dated photos next to the inspection checklist turn “your word against mine” into documented fact.
• Itemize line by line. One description and one amount per deduction, never a single lump sum, and attach the receipt.
• Respect the item’s life expectancy. Prorate for age rather than charging full replacement cost on a used item.
• Document every notice and date. The thirty-day and sixty-day rules reward a landlord who can show a compliant, timely process.

Published by Tenant Screening Background Check

Established 2004 · 20+ Years · All U.S. States & Territories · Statute-Based · Attorney-Reviewed

A Private Eye Reports™ service trusted by landlords, property managers, and attorneys.