▶

Free Missouri Security Deposit Itemization (Auto-Calc PDF)

▶ Watch overview

Thirty days, itemized, twice the penalty if you get it wrong — the written itemized list of damages a Missouri landlord must furnish under Mo. Rev. Stat. §535.300 when any part of the deposit is kept. It adds up your deductions, subtracts them from the deposit, and writes the refund or balance straight into the PDF.

Mo. Rev. Stat. §535.300 30-Day Deadline Auto-Calc Refund Free PDF

A Missouri security deposit itemization is the written itemized list of damages that Mo. Rev. Stat. §535.300(3) requires a landlord to furnish whenever any part of the deposit is withheld. Within thirty days after the tenancy terminates, a Missouri landlord must either return the full deposit or hand the tenant this line-by-line accounting together with the balance. Missouri caps the deposit at two months’ rent, gives the tenant the right to be present at the move-out inspection, and lets a wronged tenant recover twice the amount wrongfully withheld. The generator below does the arithmetic: enter the deposit and each deduction, and it totals them, subtracts, and prints a ready-to-sign statement. Confirm the current statute text at the Missouri Revisor of Statutes before you send it, and pair it with the Missouri return letter that transmits it.

The itemization is one equation wrapped in a legal deadline. You begin with the original security deposit the tenant paid — which in Missouri may not have exceeded two months’ rent when it was collected under Mo. Rev. Stat. §535.300(1). From that figure you subtract every lawful deduction, each listed on its own line with a description and a dollar amount. What remains is the refund you enclose. If the deductions add up to more than the deposit, the equation goes negative and the statement instead shows the balance the tenant owes you. This document is the heart of Missouri deposit compliance: subsection 3 does not merely say “explain yourself,” it requires a written itemized list of the damages for which the deposit is withheld.

What makes Missouri distinctive is the thirty-day clock in subsection 3 paired with the inspection right in subsection 5. The landlord must furnish the itemized list or the full refund within thirty days of the tenancy’s termination, and before withholding anything the landlord must give the tenant reasonable written notice of the inspection so the tenant can be present. Miss either step and a withheld amount can become wrongful, exposing the landlord to twice that amount. The generator on this page handles the money side flawlessly: it sums the deduction lines as you type, subtracts, and prints matching numbers into the PDF, so the arithmetic on the page and on the statement never disagree.

Fill in the parties, the deposit, and one line for each deduction. As you type, the calculator at the bottom updates in real time; when you click generate, the same totals are written into a formatted Missouri itemized statement you can print, sign, and mail. Every field below reaches the document, and the refund or balance is computed for you under Mo. Rev. Stat. §535.300. If you also want a cover letter to transmit it, use the companion Missouri deposit return letter form.

Missouri’s entire security deposit framework lives in a single statute, Mo. Rev. Stat. §535.300, and every landlord who holds a residential deposit is bound by it. The section opens in subsection 1 by capping the deposit a landlord may demand or receive at two months’ rent. Subsection 2 addresses how the money is held: the deposit is kept for the tenant, and any interest earned on it is the property of the landlord. The operative deadline sits in subsection 3: within thirty days after the tenancy terminates, the landlord must either return the full deposit or furnish the tenant a written itemized list of the damages withheld, along with the balance of the deposit. That written itemized list is precisely the document this page generates.

Subsection 4 is the deduction list, and it is narrow by design. A Missouri landlord may withhold from the deposit only for a limited set of reasons: to remedy the tenant’s default in the payment of rent; to restore the dwelling unit to its condition at the commencement of the tenancy, with ordinary wear and tear expressly excepted; and to compensate the landlord for actual damages sustained because the tenant failed to give adequate notice of termination. Anything outside those categories — and any charge for ordinary wear — is not a permitted deduction. Subsection 5 adds the inspection right: the landlord must give the tenant reasonable written notice of the date and time of the move-out inspection, and the tenant has the right to be present. Subsection 6 supplies the teeth: a landlord who wrongfully withholds all or any portion of the deposit is liable to the tenant for twice the amount wrongfully withheld.

Missouri landlords often blur two documents that the statute treats differently. The itemization is the statutory instrument named in subsection 3: the written itemized list of the damages for which the deposit is withheld. It is the accounting — each deduction on its own line with a description and a dollar figure, the deposit at the top, and the refund or balance at the bottom. A return letter, by contrast, is the cover correspondence that transmits the accounting: the salutation, the paragraph explaining what is enclosed, the signature. The statute mandates the first; the second is a courtesy that carries it.

In practice a landlord usually sends both, stapled together, which is why the two are easy to conflate. But they are not interchangeable. A “Dear Tenant” letter with a lump-sum figure and no line items does not satisfy subsection 3, because the statute demands the itemized list, not a summary. Conversely, a bare spreadsheet of deductions with no cover note still satisfies the itemization requirement, though most landlords prefer to add a short transmittal for clarity. This page builds the itemization itself — the document the statute actually requires — and you can pair it with the companion deposit refund cover letter when you want a formal cover page. Keeping them as two separate forms mirrors how a Missouri judge will read your file: the itemized list is the compliance record; the letter is the envelope.

The line between a lawful Missouri deduction and an unlawful one is the difference between damage and ordinary wear and tear. Subsection 4 authorizes only the cost of restoring the unit to its move-in condition, wear excepted — not upgrades, not routine turnover cleaning, and not the aging that happens even when a tenant is careful. The federal Department of Housing and Urban Development describes ordinary wear and tear as the deterioration that results from the intended, ordinary use of a dwelling; damage, by contrast, is harm from negligence, carelessness, accident, or abuse. Only the second category may appear on a Missouri itemization.

A useful test is to ask whether the condition came from living in the unit or from misusing it. Carpet flattened along the path from the door to the sofa is wear; the same carpet with a bleach stain is damage. Missouri courts, like courts elsewhere, also respect the depreciation idea behind HUD’s life-expectancy tables: if a carpet’s useful life is seven years and the tenant lived there five, the landlord cannot itemize a brand-new carpet, because most of that value was already used up by ordinary aging. When a line item is close to the wear-and-tear boundary, deduct conservatively and document thoroughly — an over-aggressive itemization is the fastest route to the subsection 6 penalty.

It helps to watch the equation run once with real numbers under Missouri law. Suppose a tenant paid a security deposit of fifteen hundred dollars — well within the two-month cap for a unit renting at a thousand dollars a month — and no lease term or ordinance credited interest, so the interest field stays at zero. The starting pool the landlord is accounting for is therefore fifteen hundred dollars, all of it the tenant’s money held under §535.300 until lawful deductions are applied.

At the move-out inspection, which the landlord noticed in writing and the tenant attended, the landlord finds three chargeable items. The tenant left one month of rent unpaid, which the lease pegs at nine hundred fifty dollars. A dog left urine stains that required professional carpet treatment, invoiced at two hundred eighty dollars. And a bedroom wall had several fist-sized holes that cost one hundred twenty dollars to patch and repaint. Faded paint elsewhere and a worn path in the hallway carpet were left off the list entirely, because those are ordinary wear and tear and charging for them would convert a lawful itemization into a wrongful withholding.

The three lawful deductions total thirteen hundred fifty dollars. Subtracting that from the fifteen-hundred-dollar deposit leaves a refund of one hundred fifty dollars owed back to the tenant, which the landlord encloses with the statement and delivers within thirty days. Had the damage been worse — say a ruined subfloor pushing deductions past the deposit — the equation would have gone negative, and the statement would instead show a balance the tenant owes, with the same line-item detail and receipts behind it. The generator above produces exactly this arithmetic, whichever way it lands, and prints the matching figures into the PDF so the page and the statement never disagree.

The single most common reason a Missouri deposit deduction fails in court is not that the charge was unfair — it is that the line item was too vague to defend. A judge reading an itemization is looking for three things on every line: a specific condition, a specific location, and a specific amount tied to a receipt. A line that reads “cleaning — three hundred dollars” invites the tenant to argue the unit was left broom-clean and the number was invented. A line that reads “Professional cleaning of kitchen and two bathrooms left with grease, soap scum, and mildew, per attached ABC Cleaning invoice dated March 3 — one hundred eighty-five dollars” tells the judge exactly what happened and what it cost.

Write each deduction as if the tenant will contest it, because the ones worth contesting usually get contested. Name the room, describe the condition in plain words, and anchor the amount to a document: an invoice, a receipt, a written estimate, or a labor log at a stated hourly rate. Where a deduction covers your own labor rather than a contractor’s bill, say so and state the hours and the rate, because a Missouri court will scrutinize round numbers that look like guesses. Attach photographs keyed to each line, dated at move-out and, ideally, matched to a move-in photo of the same spot. The itemization the generator produces gives you the numbered structure; your job is to make the description on each line carry its own weight.

The whole itemization deadline hangs on a single date — the termination of the tenancy — yet that date is not always obvious, and getting it wrong is how careful landlords still blow the thirty days. Under subsection 3 the clock runs from the date the tenancy terminates, not from the date the tenant happens to hand back the keys, and the two are not always the same. For a fixed-term lease that simply expires, the termination date is the last day of the term. For a month-to-month tenancy ended by proper notice, it is the date the notice makes effective. For a tenancy the tenant ends early by moving out, it is generally the date the tenant surrenders possession, though a landlord who keeps charging rent under the lease may argue the tenancy continued.

Three fact patterns cause the most trouble in Missouri. The first is the holdover tenant who stays past the term: the clock does not start until that holdover tenancy itself terminates, so a landlord who itemizes prematurely may be counting from the wrong day. The second is abandonment, where the tenant leaves without notice; here the safest course is to fix termination as the date you reasonably determined the unit was abandoned and to document how you reached it, because the thirty days will be measured against that date if the tenant later resurfaces. The third is a partial move-out by one of several tenants, where the tenancy as a whole has not ended even though one occupant is gone. When the termination date is genuinely uncertain, choose the earliest defensible date and work from it, because counting from too early a date only helps you, while counting from too late a date is what triggers subsection 6.

Subsection 1 caps the Missouri security deposit at two months’ rent, and the cap does more work than landlords expect. It is measured against the monthly rent, so a unit renting at one thousand dollars a month may carry a deposit of up to two thousand dollars, and a demand above that ceiling violates the statute from the moment it is collected. The cap looks at what is functionally a security deposit, not merely what the lease labels one: a so-called “cleaning deposit,” “pet deposit,” or “last month’s rent” held as security can be counted toward the two-month ceiling if it functions as security against damage or default, so stacking several refundable deposits can quietly breach subsection 1 even when no single line is over the limit.

The cap matters at itemization time because the deposit you are accounting for is the lawful deposit, and an over-collected deposit does not become lawful just because you kept good records at move-out. If a court finds the deposit exceeded two months’ rent, the excess was never a valid security deposit to withhold against, which can turn a tidy itemization into a wrongful-withholding problem. When you set the deposit at the start of a Missouri tenancy, size it to the two-month cap and label refundable and non-refundable charges clearly, so the number you carry into this itemization is one the statute recognizes. If you manage units in several states, confirm each state’s ceiling on the security deposit laws directory, because two months is Missouri’s number, not a national rule.

An itemization is only as strong as the evidence behind it, and Missouri’s double-damages penalty makes weak evidence expensive. The backbone of a defensible file is a matched pair of records: a move-in condition report signed at the start of the tenancy and a move-out condition report from the inspection under subsection 5. When the two are read side by side, each deduction on the statement corresponds to a documented change — a wall that was intact and is now holed, a carpet that was clean and is now stained. Without the move-in baseline, a tenant can plausibly claim the condition predated the tenancy, and a Missouri judge has little to weigh against that claim.

Photographs are the second pillar, and their value depends on discipline rather than quantity. Date-stamp every photo, shoot the same locations at move-in and move-out, and capture wide shots that establish the room as well as close-ups that show the specific damage. Keep the contractor invoices, material receipts, and any written estimates that support each dollar figure, and if part of a deduction is your own labor, log the hours and the rate rather than writing a round number. Retain the whole package — signed statement, condition reports, photos, receipts, and proof of delivery — in the tenant’s file for the length of any limitations period, because a deposit dispute can surface months after move-out. A completed move-in and move-out inspection checklist is the simplest way to build the matched-pair record the itemization relies on, and screening applicants carefully with a thorough rental application up front reduces how often you ever reach a contested itemization.

Most deposit disputes involve one tenant, but the ones that go sideways often involve several. When two or more tenants share a Missouri tenancy and a single deposit, the deposit is ordinarily treated as a joint fund: the landlord accounts for one deposit and owes one refund, and it is generally not the landlord’s job to split the refund among roommates according to who paid what. The prudent practice is to make the refund check payable jointly, or to follow whatever the lease specifies, and to send the single itemized statement to an address that reaches the tenants. Where roommates have scattered to different addresses, delivering to the last known address of the tenancy still satisfies the statute even if the internal split is left for the roommates to sort out among themselves.

The forwarding address deserves its own attention because tenants frequently forget to leave one, and its absence does not extend the deadline. Ask for a forwarding address in writing before move-out and record it, but if none arrives, deliver the itemization and any refund to the tenant’s last known address within the thirty days rather than waiting. If a refund check is later returned undelivered, keep it and the envelope showing the attempt, because the returned check is evidence that you tried to comply on time. The statutory duty is to furnish the itemization and return the balance within thirty days to a lawful address; it is not a duty to track down a tenant who left no way to be found. Documenting a good-faith, timely delivery to the last known address is the answer to a tenant who later claims never to have received the statement.

Missouri gives the tenant a statutory role in the move-out inspection that many landlords overlook. Under §535.300(5), before withholding any part of the deposit the landlord must give the tenant, or the tenant’s representative, reasonable written notice of the date and time the landlord will inspect the unit to determine what to withhold, and the inspection must be held at a reasonable time. The tenant then has the right to be present at that inspection. The notice can be delivered in person or sent to the tenant’s last known address.

This is not a formality. An inspection the tenant could attend produces a shared record of the unit’s condition, which is exactly the kind of contemporaneous evidence that carries weight if a deduction is later challenged. A landlord who skips the written notice, or who inspects at an unreasonable hour with no chance for the tenant to appear, weakens the defense of every line on the itemization that follows. Pair the inspection with a completed move-in and move-out inspection checklist and dated photographs so each line on the statement can be tied back to a documented change in condition.

A Missouri tenant who believes the itemization is wrong or the deposit was kept without cause is not without recourse. The everyday forum is small claims court, where deposit disputes are among the most common cases and where a tenant usually does not need a lawyer. What raises the stakes for a careless landlord is subsection 6: if the landlord wrongfully withholds all or any portion of the deposit in violation of the section, the tenant recovers as damages twice the amount wrongfully withheld.

Note the precise contours of that remedy. The multiplier applies to the portion wrongfully withheld, not to the entire deposit, so a landlord who correctly deducts nine hundred fifty dollars of unpaid rent but wrongly tacks on a two-hundred-dollar wear-and-tear charge faces double damages on the two hundred, not the whole sum. And unlike some states, the Missouri deposit statute as written does not add a separate award of attorney fees in this section — the doubling is the statutory penalty. Because the exact application turns on the facts, a tenant weighing a claim, or a landlord assessing exposure, should read the current text at the Missouri Revisor and consult the broader Missouri landlord-tenant laws.

The mechanics of a claim also reward the prepared landlord. A Missouri deposit dispute usually lands in small claims court, where the tenant files, the landlord answers, and both sides bring their exhibits to a short hearing. What decides these cases is rarely a point of law — it is whose paperwork is more credible. A landlord who arrives with a signed itemization, matched move-in and move-out condition reports, dated photographs, receipts numbered to the line items, and proof of timely delivery presents a record the judge can follow line by line. A tenant arguing that the whole deposit was kept without cause has a much harder time when each deduction is documented and each number is tied to a receipt. Conversely, a landlord who shows up with a lump-sum figure and no supporting records invites the court to find the withholding wrongful and to apply the subsection 6 multiplier. The itemization this page builds is the centerpiece of that file, and the surrounding documentation is what makes it persuasive rather than merely tidy.

Most Missouri deposit disputes trace back to a short list of avoidable errors. Reviewing them before you deliver the statement is the cheapest insurance available.

Two refinements separate a rushed Missouri itemization from a defensible one. The first is interest. Under §535.300(2), any interest earned on a residential security deposit is the property of the landlord, so the statute itself does not make interest payable to the tenant, and for most Missouri tenancies the interest field on this form stays at zero. Where a written lease term or a local ordinance nonetheless promises the tenant interest, that promise is enforceable as a matter of contract or local law, and you would add the credited interest to the deposit before subtracting deductions. When in doubt, treat interest as owed to the tenant only if a document you signed or a local rule says so.

The second refinement is prorating for an item’s age. A Missouri landlord cannot itemize a departing tenant the full price of a brand-new replacement for something already partway through its useful life, because subsection 4 authorizes only restoration to the move-in condition, not betterment. HUD’s life-expectancy guidance is the common reference point: interior paint is often treated as lasting two or three years, plush carpet roughly five to seven, and larger appliances closer to ten. If a carpet with a seven-year life is damaged after five years of tenancy, only the remaining fraction of its value is fairly chargeable. Applying that proration signals good faith and keeps a deduction proportionate if the tenant challenges it in small claims court.

Security deposit itemization rules vary widely from state to state, and Missouri sits in the middle of the pack on timing while carrying a sharper-than-average penalty. The thirty-day deadline is common, but some neighboring states run shorter or longer clocks, and several set a different window when there are no deductions than when there are. What distinguishes Missouri is the combination of a firm thirty-day rule, the tenant’s statutory inspection right, and the double-damages remedy for wrongful withholding — a package that rewards a careful landlord and punishes a sloppy one.

• Calendar the thirty days. Count from the date the tenancy terminated and deliver well before day thirty, with proof.
• Give written inspection notice. Subsection 5 requires it; a tenant who could attend is far less likely to dispute the result.
• Deduct only within subsection 4. Unpaid rent, restoration to move-in condition, and damages from inadequate notice — nothing else.
• Photograph at move-in and move-out. Dated photos next to the inspection checklist turn “your word against mine” into documented fact.
• Itemize line by line. One description and one amount per deduction, never a single lump sum, and attach the receipt.
• Respect the item’s life expectancy. Prorate for age rather than charging full replacement cost on a used item.
• Deliver to the last known address. Certified mail with a return receipt gives you provable timing and delivery.
• Keep a copy. Retain the signed statement, the receipts, and the delivery proof in the tenant’s file.

Published by Tenant Screening Background Check

Established 2004 · 20+ Years · All U.S. States & Territories · Statute-Based · Attorney-Reviewed

A Private Eye Reports™ service trusted by landlords, property managers, and attorneys.