Free Kentucky Month-to-Month Rental Agreement
Kentucky’s thirty-day rule is real, and it does not apply everywhere in Kentucky. KRS § 383.695(2) sits inside a range of sections that bind only where a city, county or urban-county government has adopted them — so the first question on a Kentucky tenancy is not what the notice period is, but whether your jurisdiction opted in.
Kentucky is the state where a national form is most likely to be confidently wrong. KRS § 383.695(2) allows either the landlord or the tenant to end a month-to-month tenancy on thirty days’ written notice before the periodic rental date named in the notice — but § 383.695 belongs to the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act as enacted in Kentucky, and KRS § 383.500 makes that Act apply only in jurisdictions that have adopted it. A Kentucky agreement that prints “30 days” as a flat statewide rule states something that is not true for most of the state.
Build your Kentucky month-to-month rental agreement
Fill in the fields below and the generator produces a clean, dated PDF you can print, sign and keep with your records. Nothing is stored and there is no charge. Fields you leave blank print as a dash so you can complete them by hand.
The adoption question comes before the notice question
KRS § 383.500 authorises cities, counties and urban-county governments to adopt KRS 383.505 to 383.705 in their entirety and without amendment, and speaks throughout in terms of what applies “if adopted”. § 383.695 — the periodic tenancy and holdover section — sits squarely inside that range. So does almost every other tenant-protection figure people quote for Kentucky. Before relying on the thirty days, find out whether the city or county where the property sits opted in. The generator above asks the question directly and offers “not yet checked” as an answer, because an unchecked assumption is the actual risk here.
Watch: Free Kentucky Month-to-Month Rental Agreement explained
Kentucky month-to-month tenancy at a glance
Notice where the Act is adopted
30 days where adopted, either party
Where it is not adopted
§ 383.695 does not bind
Week-to-week
7 days under § 383.695(1)
Willful holdover
Up to 3 months’ rent or treble damages, plus fees
Where the Act was not adopted, what governs?
The rental agreement and Kentucky’s general law of landlord and tenant, rather than the URLTA sections. That is a materially different starting point: the detailed, tenant-friendly machinery people associate with Kentucky residential tenancies — the notice periods, the holdover remedy, the rest of the 383.505 to 383.705 range — is simply not in play. This page does not attempt to state what the non-adopting default period is, because that was not measured in the source read for this page, and inventing a figure to fill the gap is exactly the failure this whole section exists to warn about. What the agreement can do is record a notice period the parties have actually agreed, which is enforceable as a contract term regardless of adoption status.
How to end a Kentucky month-to-month tenancy
Check whether your jurisdiction adopted the Act
City, county or urban-county government. This is step one and everything downstream depends on the answer. KRS § 383.500 is the authorising section, and the adoption itself is a local enactment.
If it is adopted, use thirty days to a rental date
§ 383.695(2) requires written notice given at least thirty days before the periodic rental date specified in the notice — so the notice names a rental date and the thirty days are counted back from it.
If it is not adopted, work from the agreement
A notice period the parties wrote into the agreement binds them as a contract term. That is why the ENDING THE TENANCY fields matter more in Kentucky than almost anywhere else.
Check which subsection your tenancy is actually under
§ 383.695(1) sets seven days for a week-to-week tenancy, and (3) sets ten days for a tenancy that began when a written lease ended. Those are different arrangements with different periods.
Put it in writing and keep proof
§ 383.695 says written notice in each of its first three subsections. Keep a dated copy and evidence of delivery: the thirty days are measured back from the rental date the notice names, and you may have to prove when the notice was given.
About the Kentucky month-to-month rental agreement
Kentucky enacted the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, but it did so as a local-option statute: KRS § 383.500 lets local governments take the whole of KRS 383.505 to 383.705 or leave it, and forbids adopting it with amendments. The result is a state with two regimes running side by side, and a tenancy’s address decides which one it is under. A Kentucky month-to-month agreement is therefore doing something a form in a single-regime state does not have to do: it has to be honest about which body of law it is operating under, and it has to carry terms that stand up either way. The generator above records the jurisdiction checked and the adoption status alongside the ordinary terms, so the document itself shows what was assumed.
What a Kentucky month-to-month agreement should record
- The city, county or urban-county government where the premises sit, and whether it has adopted KRS 383.505 to 383.705
- The full names of the landlord and of every adult tenant
- The address of the premises, including the unit number
- The rent, the interval it covers, and the periodic rental date it falls due on
- That the tenancy is month-to-month and continues until terminated by written notice
- The notice period the parties are relying on, and whether it comes from § 383.695 or from this agreement
- The address each party sends notice to, and the delivery method
- The security deposit, where it is held, and what the tenant is told about its return
- Which utilities and services each party pays for
- The pet, smoking, guest and alteration rules
Common Kentucky mistakes
- Printing “30 days” as a statewide Kentucky rule. It is the rule in adopting jurisdictions. KRS § 383.500 conditions the entire 383.505 to 383.705 range on adoption, and most Kentucky forms omit that condition entirely.
- Assuming the county follows the city, or the reverse. § 383.500 names cities, counties and urban-county governments separately, so check the specific jurisdiction the property sits in rather than assuming a neighbouring or containing one settles it.
- Quoting other Kentucky figures without the same caveat. The notice period is not the only number inside the adopted-only range — the same qualifier attaches to the other sections in it, and a form that carries one figure correctly and three others flatly is still misleading.
- Using the thirty-day rule for a tenancy that followed a written lease. § 383.695(3) sets ten days for a tenancy begun on the termination of a written lease, and adds that if the tenant fails to pay rent within ten days of its due date the landlord may terminate at any time without notice.
- Underestimating the holdover exposure. § 383.695(4) reaches three months’ periodic rent or threefold the actual damages, whichever is greater, plus reasonable attorney’s fees — a materially harsher remedy than Arizona’s near-identical subsection, which caps at two months or double damages and adds no fees.
Is the Kentucky notice period really 30 days?
Where the Act was adopted, yes. KRS § 383.695(2) provides that the landlord or the tenant may terminate a month-to-month tenancy by written notice given to the other at least thirty days before the periodic rental date specified in the notice. Read on its own that is a clean, symmetric rule and it is what almost every Kentucky form prints.
Read in context it carries a condition. § 383.695 sits inside KRS 383.505 to 383.705, and KRS § 383.500 authorises cities, counties and urban-county governments to adopt that range “in their entirety and without amendment”, speaking throughout of what applies if adopted. The thirty days is a rule of the adopting jurisdictions, not a rule of Kentucky at large.
This is not a technicality
It changes the answer depending on the address. A tenant told that they have thirty days’ protection, in a county that never adopted the Act, has been told something about a different place. We have not counted how many Kentucky jurisdictions adopted it, so this page does not tell you whether yours is likely to have — that is precisely the thing to check rather than estimate. The honest first question on any Kentucky tenancy is which regime the property is in, and it has to be answered locally: the adoption is a local enactment, not something recorded in the state statute itself.
The three periods in § 383.695
The section is not a single rule. Its first three subsections cover three different arrangements, and using the wrong one is as much an error as ignoring adoption:
- Week-to-week — § 383.695(1): written notice at least seven days before the termination date named in the notice.
- Month-to-month — § 383.695(2): written notice at least thirty days before the periodic rental date named in the notice.
- A tenancy that began when a written lease ended — § 383.695(3): written notice at least ten days before the termination date. The same subsection adds that if the tenant fails to pay rent within ten days after it becomes due, the landlord may terminate the tenancy at any time without notice.
That third subsection catches people. A tenant who stayed on after a one-year lease expired is often assumed to have become a thirty-day month-to-month tenant. Under § 383.695(3) the default period for that arrangement is ten days, and the nonpayment provision attached to it is harsher than anything in the first two subsections.
What holding over costs in Kentucky
§ 383.695(4) is the holdover provision. If the tenant remains in possession without the landlord’s consent after the tenancy has ended, the landlord may bring an action for possession; and where the holdover is willful and not in good faith, the landlord may also recover an amount not more than three months’ periodic rent or threefold the actual damages sustained, whichever is greater, and reasonable attorney’s fees.
It is worth putting that beside Arizona’s § 33-1375(C), which is the same uniform provision as that state enacted it: up to two months’ rent or twice the actual damages, and no mention of fees. The sections look almost identical on the page and the exposure differs by half again plus costs. This is the clearest illustration on this site of why a uniform act is not a uniform outcome, and why a national form cannot be trusted on a number.
If the landlord consents to the tenant staying on, § 383.695(4) routes to KRS § 383.565(3) instead and the holdover analysis does not apply.
Drafting a Kentucky agreement that works either way
Because adoption status changes which statutory scaffolding is available, a Kentucky agreement should carry its own terms rather than leaning on the Code to supply them. A notice period written into the agreement binds the parties as a matter of contract whether or not the local government adopted the Act. So does the notice address, the delivery method, and the deposit accounting the landlord promises.
What the agreement should not try to do is cut below a protection that does apply. In an adopting jurisdiction, a clause purporting to give a tenant less than the thirty days in § 383.695(2) is asking the contract to override a statute the local government deliberately took on in its entirety. Whether such a clause would hold is not settled by § 383.695 itself, which contains no anti-waiver language — confirm it before relying on one. The safe construction is to record the agreed period and note which source it comes from, which is what the generator above produces.
There is one further limit worth knowing, and it cuts the other way. § 383.500 closes with a preemption clause: “No other ordinance shall be enacted by a city, county or urban-county government which relates to the subjects embraced in KRS 383.505 to 383.705.” So an adopting jurisdiction takes the Act whole and may not layer its own residential landlord-tenant ordinance on top of the subjects it covers. Kentucky’s local option is a choice between the Act and no Act — not an invitation to write a local variant.
Where the rest of the Kentucky rules sit
The adoption caveat is not confined to notice periods. Deposit handling, entry notice and the rest of the residential machinery live in the same adopted-only range, so a figure quoted for any of them carries the same qualifier. Our Kentucky security deposit laws guide covers the deposit side, and Kentucky eviction notice laws covers what follows a notice that is ignored.
If you are weighing a periodic tenancy against a fixed term, the trade-off in Kentucky is sharper than elsewhere: a written lease brings its own end date and its own certainty, and it takes the adoption question out of the termination analysis for as long as it runs.
Where a month-to-month tenancy meets the rest of Kentucky law
A periodic tenancy is the arrangement where rent changes most often, because there is no fixed term holding the number still. The notice a rent change takes is a separate question from the notice that ends the tenancy, and the two are easily confused — so they are worth reading together. Our guide to Kentucky rent increase laws covers how a rent change works on a periodic tenancy here.
The deposit is the other thing a month-to-month tenancy makes harder, because the tenancy can end on short notice and the clock for returning the money starts running the moment it does. Kentucky security deposit laws cover what a landlord may deduct and the deadline for accounting for the rest — a deadline that is easy to miss when a tenancy can end at any point in the year rather than at the end of a lease term.
If the notice is ignored, ending a tenancy stops being a paperwork question and becomes a court one. Kentucky eviction notice laws set out the notices that come next and how they must be served. A termination notice and an eviction notice are different documents doing different jobs, and serving the wrong one is one of the more common ways a straightforward ending turns into a contested case.
Bottom line
The thirty days in KRS § 383.695(2) binds only where the local government adopted KRS 383.505 to 383.705 under KRS § 383.500. Check adoption before relying on any Kentucky figure, and note that a tenancy which began when a written lease ended runs on ten days under § 383.695(3), not thirty.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much notice ends a month-to-month tenancy in Kentucky?
Thirty days where the Act applies. KRS § 383.695(2) allows either party to terminate on written notice given at least thirty days before the periodic rental date named in the notice. But § 383.695 sits inside KRS 383.505 to 383.705, which KRS § 383.500 makes applicable only in cities, counties and urban-county governments that adopted it.
How do I find out whether my city or county adopted the Act?
It is a local enactment, so the answer comes from the city, county or urban-county government rather than from the state statute. KRS § 383.500 is the authorising section; whether a given jurisdiction acted on it is a local record.
What applies if my jurisdiction did not adopt it?
The rental agreement and Kentucky’s general landlord and tenant law, rather than the KRS 383.505 to 383.705 machinery. This page does not print a default figure for that situation because it was not measured in the source read here, and guessing at one would repeat the exact error this page is about.
Is the week-to-week period also thirty days?
No. § 383.695(1) sets seven days for a week-to-week tenancy, given at least seven days before the termination date named in the notice.
I stayed on after my written lease ended. Do I get thirty days?
Not under § 383.695(3), which covers a tenancy begun upon the termination of a written lease and sets ten days. The same subsection adds that if the tenant fails to pay rent within ten days after it becomes due, the landlord may terminate at any time without notice.
What happens if the tenant stays past the termination date?
§ 383.695(4) allows an action for possession, and where the holdover is willful and not in good faith, up to three months’ periodic rent or threefold the actual damages, whichever is greater, plus reasonable attorney’s fees.
Why is Kentucky’s holdover remedy harsher than Arizona’s?
Both states enacted the same uniform provision and changed the numbers. Kentucky’s § 383.695(4) reaches three months’ rent or treble damages and adds attorney’s fees; Arizona’s § 33-1375(C) caps at two months or double damages and mentions no fees.
Can our agreement set its own notice period?
It can, and in Kentucky that is worth doing. A period written into the agreement binds the parties as a contract term whether or not the Act was adopted locally. What it cannot do is cut below § 383.695 in a jurisdiction where that section does apply.
Screen Kentucky tenants thoroughly before move-in
A solid tenant relationship starts with thorough screening. Tenant Screening Background Check has been verifying renters since 2004 — credit, eviction filings, criminal background, and employment — across all 50 states and DC.
Related Resources
Published by Tenant Screening Background Check
Established 2004 · 20+ Years · All U.S. States & Territories · Statute-Based · Attorney-Reviewed
A Private Eye Reports™ service trusted by landlords, property managers, and attorneys.
