Free Oregon Sublease Agreement

Oregon’s Residential Landlord and Tenant Act leaves the consent question to your rental agreement. What it adds is a procedure for the situation that goes wrong: the tenant has gone, someone else is living there, and nobody agreed to it.

Fill in the fields below and the generator produces a clean, dated PDF you can print, sign and hand to your subtenant. Nothing is stored and there is no charge. Fields you leave blank print as a dash so you can complete them by hand.

Watch: Oregon Sublease Agreement explained

▶ Watch overview

The third condition is that the landlord “has not knowingly accepted rent from the person in possession”. A landlord who takes payments from the occupant, knowing who they are, loses the 24-hour route. That is a rule about conduct rather than paperwork, and it cuts both ways: an occupant who has been paying the landlord directly for months is in a materially different position from one who has never dealt with them, and a landlord who wants to preserve the option should not be accepting that money.

• The property address including unit number, and the county.
• The names of the tenant (as sublessor) and the subtenant, and any other occupants.
• The sublease term, ending on or before your own tenancy ends.
• The rent, when it is due, and how it is paid.
• Any deposit, and the conditions for its return.
• Which utilities and services the subtenant pays.
• A reference to the landlord’s written permission, with the date it was given.
• A statement that the subtenant has received and read the rental agreement.
• Signatures and dates from both parties.

• Citing ORS 90.555 for an apartment. That section governs subleasing agreements between a facility landlord, a facility tenant who owns a manufactured dwelling or floating home, and a renter. It is not the rule for a conventional rental.
• Reading 90.403 as a general 24-hour eviction power. All three conditions must hold, and condition (b) requires that the agreement actually prohibited subleasing without written permission.
• Accepting rent from the occupant and then relying on 90.403. Condition (c) removes the route once the landlord knowingly accepts rent from the person in possession.
• Assuming a 90.403 notice makes the occupant a tenant. Subsection (2) says the opposite: service of the notice does not create a right of tenancy.
• Moving out and leaving the subtenant to sort it out. The tenant having vacated is condition (a) — it is what opens the section rather than what closes it.

Your rental agreement decides. Oregon’s Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, ORS chapter 90, does not give tenants a general right to sublet, and a clause requiring the landlord’s written permission is effective. What the chapter adds is a specific procedure for what happens when someone ends up in the premises without that permission.

Search for Oregon sublease law and you will quickly find ORS 90.555, headed “Subleasing agreements”. The title is exactly what you were looking for. The section is not.

Its own definitions confine it. A “facility tenant” is defined as the owner of the manufactured dwelling or floating home who rents from a facility landlord; a “renter” is someone occupying that manufactured dwelling or floating home under a subleasing agreement. The section governs a three-way arrangement between a facility landlord, a homeowner renting a space, and the person occupying the home. If you rent an apartment or a house, none of those roles is yours.

This is worth saying plainly because a confidently-cited but wrong statute is worse than no citation at all. The provision that reaches conventional rentals is ORS 90.403.

Twenty-four hours is a very short notice period by any standard, and that is why the conditions attached to it deserve more attention than the number does. They are cumulative — the statute joins them with “and” — so failing any one of them takes the route away.

The rental agreement must have prohibited subleasing or allowing another person to occupy the premises without written permission. A silent agreement does not satisfy this. Neither does a general clause about the number of occupants, unless it does the work the statute describes.

The practical consequence for landlords is a drafting one: if you want ORS 90.403 available to you, the prohibition has to be in the agreement before the problem arises. The practical consequence for tenants and occupants is the reverse — read the agreement, because whether this fast route exists at all depends on what it says.

A landlord who has knowingly accepted rent from the person in possession cannot use ORS 90.403. This is a rule about what actually happened rather than about what was intended, and it is easy to trip over: an occupant who starts paying the landlord directly because the original tenant has gone, and a landlord who banks it because rent is rent, have between them removed the section.

If you are a landlord who wants to preserve the option, do not accept payments from an occupant you have not authorised. If you are an occupant, a record of the landlord accepting your rent is worth keeping.

Subsection (2) closes off an argument that would otherwise be obvious. Serving a formal notice on someone can look like recognising them, and an occupant might well argue that being served as though they were a tenant made them one. The statute says it does not.

So a landlord can serve the notice without conceding anything, and an occupant should not read the notice as an accidental grant of rights. What the occupant does have is the ordinary judicial process: possession is taken “as provided in ORS 105.100 to 105.168”, the forcible-entry-and-detainer route, not by self-help.

Chapter 90 recognises subleasing in its ordinary machinery even though it does not create a right to sublet. The definition of “landlord” in ORS 90.100 includes a sublessor, which means a tenant who sublets takes on landlord obligations toward their subtenant. That is not a technicality: it is the reason a sublessor cannot simply collect rent and walk away from habitability, notice and deposit questions.

Subletting does not transfer your obligation. You owe the rent, and you answer for the condition of the premises. Price the sublease at no less than what you owe, set its due date before your own, and hold a deposit that reflects what you would be paying for if the premises are damaged.

If you are going away for a period and returning, that is a sublease. If you are leaving for good and want your name off the agreement, what you want is an assignment together with a release from the landlord — and the release is the part that ends your liability, not the assignment. If someone is moving in while you stay, that is an occupancy question, and in Oregon it matters directly: condition (b) of ORS 90.403 is phrased as prohibiting subleasing or allowing another person to occupy the premises without written permission, so both are covered by the same clause.

A sublease rarely arrives on its own. Most people reach one because something else has changed — a job in another city, a relationship ending, a lease with months left on it — so it is worth knowing what the alternatives cost before you commit to this one. Our guide to breaking a lease in Oregon sets out the early-exit routes and what each of them exposes you to, and in some situations ending the tenancy outright is cleaner than running a sublease you will have to manage from a distance.

The two disputes that actually follow a sublease are about money and about possession. On money, the deposit is where most of it happens, and the rules that govern what a landlord may take and when it has to come back are set out in Oregon security deposit laws — worth reading before you decide what to hold from your subtenant, and before you assume you know what the owner may hold from you.

On possession, the notices and timelines that apply if things go wrong are covered in Oregon eviction notice laws. You are the landlord in the sublease relationship, so those rules are as likely to be yours to use as to be used against you.

Published by Tenant Screening Background Check

Established 2004 · 20+ Years · All U.S. States & Territories · Statute-Based · Attorney-Reviewed

A Private Eye Reports™ service trusted by landlords, property managers, and attorneys.