Free Colorado Rental Application

Colorado regulates rental application fees through C.R.S. §§ 38-12-903, 904 and 905. There is no flat dollar ceiling. Instead the fee is tied to the landlord’s actual cost of screening, the landlord must charge the same fee to every applicant for the same property, and disclosure and refund duties attach. That combination makes “how much is the fee?” the wrong first question in Colorado. The better questions are what the landlord actually spent, whether everyone else was charged the same, and what was disclosed before the money changed hands.

Fill in the fields below and the generator produces a clean, dated PDF you can print, sign and hand to the landlord. Nothing is stored and there is no charge. Fields you leave blank print as a dash so you can complete them by hand.

Watch: Free Colorado Rental Application explained

▶ Watch overview

A rental application creates no tenancy; it is the document by which an applicant is identified and consents to being screened. Colorado’s fee rules sit across three sections rather than one, and they are being amended on a schedule: § 38-12-904 changes on 1 January 2026 and again on 1 January 2027. That matters for anyone printing a form or writing guidance, because a document that states today’s position without noting the pending changes will be wrong on a date that is already fixed. The generator above records the fee, whether the same fee was charged to everyone, whether the disclosure arrived before payment, and whether a refund is due, alongside the ordinary identity and history fields.

• The property applied for and the desired move-in date
• The applicant’s full legal name, date of birth and government ID
• Current and previous addresses with the landlords’ contact details
• Employer, position, gross monthly income and a verification contact
• The fee charged, and what the landlord says it covers
• Whether the same fee is charged to every applicant for this unit
• Whether the written disclosure was received before paying
• Whether any refund is due under the sections
• Written consent to obtain a consumer report, signed and dated
• An address for any adverse-action notice if the application is declined

• Reading “no cap” as “no rule”. Colorado constrains the fee by actual cost, by the equal-fee requirement and by disclosure and refund duties. None of those is a dollar figure and all of them bind.
• Charging different applicants different amounts. The equal-fee rule is the most checkable of the three constraints and the easiest to fall foul of when fees are set ad hoc.
• Not asking what the fee covers before paying it. Once the money is gone the conversation is harder to have, and the answer is what tells you whether the amount is tied to a real cost.
• Assuming the rules are static. § 38-12-904 is amended effective 1 January 2026 and again effective 1 January 2027. A form or a page written today should say so.
• Treating the fee as automatically non-refundable. Refund duties attach in the circumstances the sections describe, and they are part of the rule rather than a courtesy.

Not with a dollar figure. C.R.S. §§ 38-12-903, 904 and 905 regulate the fee without naming a maximum. What they impose instead is a limit tied to the landlord’s actual cost of screening, a requirement that the same fee be charged to every applicant for the same property, and disclosure and refund duties.

That is a meaningfully different kind of rule from a cap, and it changes what an applicant should ask. A ceiling invites the question “is this under the limit?”. Colorado’s structure invites three other questions: what did the screening actually cost, was everyone charged the same, and what was I told before I paid?

Of the three constraints, two are hard for an applicant to police. You will rarely know what a landlord’s screening provider charged, so the actual-cost limit is difficult to test from outside. Disclosure duties are easier, but they turn on what was said and when.

The equal-fee requirement is different in kind, because it can be checked with a single question: was every applicant for this unit charged the same amount? That is a fact about the landlord’s own practice rather than about invisible costs, and it does not depend on documents the applicant will never see.

It also constrains a specific behaviour that a cap would not. A ceiling permits a landlord to charge everyone the maximum. An equal-fee rule permits a landlord to charge whatever its costs justify, but not to charge one applicant more than another for the same unit.

Colorado’s provisions are not static, and anyone writing a form or relying on a summary should know the dates. The sections were introduced in 2019; §§ 903 and 905 were amended in 2023; and § 38-12-904 is amended by HB 25-1236 effective 1 January 2026 and again by HB 26-1196 effective 1 January 2027.

Two scheduled changes in consecutive years is unusual, and it means a Colorado application form has a short shelf life. It also means that guidance which states today’s rule without mentioning the pending amendments is not merely incomplete — it will be actively wrong on a date already in the statute book.

Two items on a rental application do legal work; the rest is administration. The consent to obtain a consumer report is what makes the screening lawful, so it belongs as a distinct signed item rather than a clause inside a block of small print. The adverse-action acknowledgement matters because an applicant declined wholly or partly on the strength of a consumer report is entitled under the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. § 1681m) to be told so and given the reporting agency’s details, and recording an address at the application stage is the simplest way to make sure that notice can be delivered.

The rest of the form — identity, addresses, employment, income, references — exists so the screening identifies the right person and so the landlord can verify what was said. Our guide to how to screen tenants covers the same process from the landlord’s side.

Signing one binds nobody to a tenancy. That is worth stating plainly, because the document gathers a great deal of personal information and is signed at a moment when the applicant very much wants the outcome — not a moment anyone reads carefully.

A tenancy begins only if the landlord accepts the application and both parties sign a rental agreement. The terms that then govern — the rent, the deposit, the notice each side must give — come from that agreement and the law behind it, not from anything written on the application.

An application is the one moment in a tenancy when a stranger’s history is examined, so it is worth knowing what is being looked at. Eviction records are part of most screenings, and what they mean depends on how the process works locally — our guide to Colorado eviction notice laws sets out the notices and timelines that produce those records in the first place.

If the application succeeds, the next money question is the deposit, and it is a different question from the fee discussed here: an application fee buys screening, a deposit secures the tenancy and is generally refundable. Colorado security deposit laws cover what may be held and when it has to come back.

For everything the application stage does not settle — the obligations that begin once a tenancy starts, and the rules that apply to both parties throughout it — see Colorado landlord tenant laws.

Published by Tenant Screening Background Check

Established 2004 · 20+ Years · All U.S. States & Territories · Statute-Based · Attorney-Reviewed

A Private Eye Reports™ service trusted by landlords, property managers, and attorneys.