Hawaii Tenant Screening Laws: The Landlord and Applicant Guide
FCRA Consent · Adverse Action Notices · Section 521-46 Actual-Cost Screening Fee · Act 310 Source-of-Income Protection · Individualized Criminal-History Review
Hawaii tenant screening sits at the crossroads of federal and state law: the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act, which governs how a consumer report may be pulled and used everywhere in the country, and Hawaii’s own rules, most importantly the Act 200 screening-fee law at Hawaii Revised Statutes section 521-46, which since May 1, 2024 limits the fee to the landlord’s actual cost, and Act 310, which since May 1, 2023 protects Housing Choice Voucher holders as a source of income. The Hawaii landlords who screen properly almost never face a lawsuit. The ones who skip the consent form, overcharge the screening fee, or skip the adverse action notice pay for that shortcut, and the mandatory attorney-fee provisions are what make the bill so large.
This guide walks the whole framework in plain English: the five federal Fair Credit Reporting Act requirements every landlord must meet, Hawaii’s actual-cost screening-fee rule and thirty-day refund under section 521-46, source-of-income protection for voucher holders under Act 310 and section 368F-2, the protected classes under Hawaii’s chapter 515 fair housing law, HUD’s individualized-assessment standard for criminal history, the rights every applicant holds, a day-by-day screening workflow, a compliance playbook, real scenarios, and a Hawaii-specific set of frequently asked questions.
Because Hawaii layers state protections on top of the federal baseline, the safest posture for a landlord is written consent, a screening fee kept to actual cost, consistent written criteria, and proper adverse action notices every single time, and the strongest position for an applicant is to know exactly which rights the law confers. Treat every figure and rule here as a starting point and verify the current statute before you screen, charge a fee, or dispute a decision.
Hawaii Tenant Screening at a Glance
Primary Authority
FCRA — fifteen U.S.C. section 1681 & Fair Housing Act
Hawaii Screening Fee
Section 521-46 — capped at actual cost, refund unused within thirty days
Source of Income
Act 310, section 368F-2 — vouchers protected since May 1, 2023
Criminal History
No state or local housing ban-the-box — HUD individualized assessment
The FCRA Framework in Hawaii
The Fair Credit Reporting Act, codified at fifteen U.S.C. section 1681, is the federal statute that governs tenant screening nationwide, and a Hawaii landlord must comply with it regardless of any state-law differences, then add Hawaii’s own rules under Hawaii Revised Statutes section 521-46 and the fair housing chapter 515. Getting both layers right prevents almost all screening-related liability. Five federal requirements sit at the core, and each one is load-bearing.
Permissible Purpose
A landlord has a permissible purpose under Fair Credit Reporting Act section 604(a) to pull a consumer report on a rental applicant. That is the threshold right to obtain the report at all, but it does not eliminate any of the other requirements — it only opens the door to a report the landlord must then handle correctly.
Written Consent
The applicant must provide written consent before the landlord obtains a consumer report. The consent must be clear and conspicuous, and the best practice is a standalone consent form rather than a clause buried in the rental application. Because a Hawaii screening report typically bundles a credit report, a criminal background check, and an eviction-history check, the consent should make clear what will be gathered.
Consistent Criteria
Written screening criteria must be applied consistently to every applicant. Inconsistency creates both Fair Credit Reporting Act disparate-treatment exposure and Fair Housing Act liability, because bending the rule for one applicant and not another is powerful evidence of discrimination even where none was intended.
Pre-Adverse Action Notice
Before finalizing a rejection based even in part on a report, the landlord must send a pre-adverse action notice that includes a copy of the report and the Fair Credit Reporting Act summary of rights, and then wait a reasonable period — commonly at least five business days — so the applicant can dispute an error before the decision becomes final.
Adverse Action Notice
When the rejection becomes final, the landlord must send an adverse action notice identifying the consumer reporting agency, explaining the applicant’s dispute rights, and including the summary of rights. This step is not optional, and it applies to any adverse action — not only an outright denial, but also a higher deposit or an added condition driven by the report.
FCRA sections 616 and 617 penalties
The Fair Credit Reporting Act imposes serious penalties. A willful violation carries statutory damages of one hundred to one thousand dollars per violation, actual damages, and punitive damages; a negligent violation carries actual damages; and both carry mandatory attorney fees. Extreme willful conduct can even be treated as a federal offense. The mandatory attorney-fee provision is precisely what makes Fair Credit Reporting Act class actions so aggressive, because the cost of a single dropped step shifts to the landlord.
Takeaway
The federal Fair Credit Reporting Act requires permissible purpose, written consent, consistent criteria, a pre-adverse action notice, and a final adverse action notice. A Hawaii landlord who does all five — consent, consistency, notice — essentially eliminates screening liability. The framework is simple; the penalty for skipping a step, driven by mandatory attorney fees, is comprehensive.
How Much Can a Landlord Charge to Screen a Tenant in Hawaii?
The Act 200 actual-cost rule under section 521-46
Hawaii regulates what a landlord may charge to screen an applicant, but it does so differently from states that publish a fixed dollar cap. Under Act 200, codified at Hawaii Revised Statutes section 521-46 and effective May 1, 2024, a landlord may not charge an application screening fee that is more than the actual cost of obtaining the information about the applicant. There is no set ceiling in dollars; the ceiling is whatever the landlord genuinely spends on the credit report, tenant report, criminal background check, or personal reference checks from a consumer reporting agency. The statute is administered by the Hawaii Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs Office of Consumer Protection, and its official guidance is published at the Hawaii Office of Consumer Protection tenant screening fee FAQ.
Three duties ride with the fee. First, any portion of the fee not actually used for the authorized screening purposes must be refunded within thirty days after the landlord submits the screening request — so if the landlord never runs a report, the whole fee comes back. Second, on request the landlord must give the applicant a receipt and a breakdown of the costs the fee covered, which lets an applicant check the charge against the real cost. Third, the fee may be charged only at the time the application is processed, and only to an adult eighteen or older or an emancipated minor who is applying to rent. Charging a screening fee is optional; the Office of Consumer Protection has noted that a contract term forcing a landlord to charge one may be unenforceable or void as against public policy.
The fee is limited to actual cost, receipted, and refundable
Charging more than the real cost of the screening, refusing to give a receipt and breakdown, or keeping an unused fee past thirty days all violate Hawaii Revised Statutes section 521-46. Keep the fee tied to the documented cost of the report, charge it only when you process the application, charge only adults or emancipated minors, and refund any unused amount within thirty days. Many older landlord guides still say Hawaii has “no limit” on application fees — that is outdated; the actual-cost rule has applied since May 1, 2024.
Takeaway
Hawaii caps the tenant screening fee at the landlord’s actual cost under section 521-46, effective May 1, 2024 — not at a fixed dollar figure. Any unused portion must be refunded within thirty days, a receipt and cost breakdown are owed on request, and the fee may be charged only at processing and only to an adult or emancipated minor.
Can a Hawaii Landlord Refuse a Section 8 Voucher Holder?
Generally no. One of the most consequential recent changes to Hawaii screening is source-of-income protection. Under Act 310 — Senate Bill 206 of 2022, codified at Hawaii Revised Statutes section 368F-2 — and effective May 1, 2023, it is unlawful to discriminate against an applicant or tenant based on their participation in the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program or a permanent supportive housing program. A covered landlord may not advertise that vouchers are not accepted, may not refuse to engage in a rental transaction because of the voucher, and may not impose rental conditions different from those required of an applicant who is not using assistance.
The protection is enforced by the Hawaii Civil Rights Commission, and a first violation can carry a fine of up to two thousand dollars, with more for later offenses. The law applies chiefly to landlords above a size threshold — reported as owning more than four rental units — with some exemptions, so a small owner-occupant landlord should verify how the rule applies to a specific property. Importantly, this does not strip a landlord of the right to screen. The landlord may still apply neutral, consistent criteria — credit, income measured against the tenant’s own share of the rent, and rental history — to a voucher holder exactly as to any other applicant. What the law forbids is treating the voucher itself as a disqualifier or steering voucher holders away.
Screen the applicant, not the voucher
Under Act 310 and section 368F-2 a Housing Choice Voucher is a protected source of income in Hawaii. Apply your standard, consistent criteria to the applicant, but measure income against the portion of the rent the tenant actually pays, never against the full contract rent, and never advertise or apply a no-voucher rule. The Hawaii Civil Rights Commission enforces this, and the voucher can never be the reason for a denial. This corrects a common misconception: Hawaii is not a state without source-of-income protection.
Takeaway
Act 310 (section 368F-2), effective May 1, 2023, makes a Housing Choice Voucher a protected source of income in Hawaii. A covered landlord may screen a voucher holder on neutral, consistent criteria but may not refuse, advertise against, or impose different conditions because of the voucher, on pain of a fine of up to two thousand dollars for a first offense.
Fair Housing Compliance in Hawaii
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in housing based on seven federally protected classes, and Hawaii’s fair housing statute, chapter 515 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, adds several more. Screening criteria must be facially neutral, predictive of tenancy success, and consistently applied, and they must not produce a disparate impact on any protected class — a criterion that looks neutral but disproportionately excludes a protected group can still be unlawful.
Federal Protected Classes
The Fair Housing Act protects race and color, national origin, religion, sex including gender identity and sexual orientation under current HUD guidance, familial status meaning the presence of children, and disability whether mental or physical. Hawaii recognizes each of these and adds more of its own.
Hawaii’s Expanded Protections
Chapter 515 makes it a discriminatory practice for an owner or other person in a real estate transaction to discriminate based on race, sex including gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, color, religion, marital status, familial status, ancestry, disability, age, or human immunodeficiency virus infection. On top of that list, Act 310 protects source of income for voucher and permanent supportive housing participants. One point of frequent confusion: Hawaii’s protection for a person’s arrest and court record lives in the employment law, not in the housing statute, so it does not by itself bar a landlord from considering criminal-conviction history within the Fair Housing Act limits below. The chapter 515 protections are enforced by the Hawaii Civil Rights Commission.
Common Hawaii Fair-Housing Traps
- Blanket criminal-history bans that auto-reject any record, which violate the disparate-impact doctrine.
- Rigid credit-score cutoffs applied with no individualized review of the applicant’s full picture.
- Income multipliers that disproportionately exclude single parents, implicating familial status.
- No-voucher policies, which are unlawful for covered landlords under Act 310 source-of-income protection.
- Denying reasonable accommodations to applicants with a disability.
- Inconsistent application of criteria across applicants of different protected classes.
Takeaway
Screening criteria must be neutral, predictive, and consistently applied, and must avoid disparate impact. Hawaii’s chapter 515 protects a long list beyond the seven federal classes — adding ancestry, marital status, age, and HIV infection — and Act 310 adds source of income, so blanket criminal bans, rigid cutoffs, exclusionary income rules, and no-voucher policies all invite liability.
Can a Landlord Reject You for a Criminal Record in Hawaii?
A Hawaii landlord may consider criminal history, but not through a blanket ban. HUD’s 2016 guidance established that a blanket criminal-record refusal can violate the Fair Housing Act as disparate-impact discrimination. The consideration must be individualized — not a blanket rule that automatically rejects any applicant with any record. Hawaii has no statewide or local ban-the-box or fair-chance ordinance for housing, so this federal HUD and Fair Housing Act standard, rather than a Hawaii-specific housing statute, is the controlling framework a landlord must follow.
The Five Assessment Factors
- Nature and severity of the offense. A decades-old shoplifting conviction differs materially from a recent violent crime or manufacturing charge.
- Time since the conviction. More recent offenses carry more predictive weight; very old convictions may have little probative value.
- Evidence of rehabilitation. Consistent employment, completed parole or probation, continuing education, or recovery documentation can rebut the presumption of risk.
- Relevance to tenancy. The offense should bear on the specific risk — violent or property crimes bear more directly than a traffic or minor drug-possession offense might.
- Consistent application. Apply the same analysis to every applicant with any criminal history; selectivity creates disparate-treatment exposure.
The blanket-ban problem, and the employment look-back trap
A policy of “we don’t rent to anyone with any conviction” is legally indefensible under HUD’s 2016 guidance, because criminal records disparately affect Black and Hispanic applicants, and a decision based solely on an arrest that never led to a conviction is especially exposed. Work the individualized factors and document the analysis instead. Note one common Hawaii mistake: the state’s seven-year felony and five-year misdemeanor look-back limits live in the employment statute, section 378-2.5, and do not govern a rental-housing decision — do not assume those windows apply to tenant screening.
Takeaway
Criminal history may be considered only through an individualized assessment weighing the nature and age of the offense, rehabilitation, relevance, and consistency — never a blanket ban, which fails HUD’s disparate-impact standard. Hawaii has no housing ban-the-box law, and its employment look-back windows under section 378-2.5 do not apply to a rental decision.
Applicant Rights Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act in Hawaii
Hawaii applicants have strong federal rights under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, supplemented by state-level protection: the actual-cost fee and receipt rule under Hawaii Revised Statutes section 521-46 and the source-of-income protection under Act 310. Understanding these rights matters for applicants who want to contest an inaccurate report and for landlords who want to avoid liability. Applicants can learn to spot problems early using our guide to red flags in a rental application, which cuts both ways.
The Five Core Rights
- Right to consent disclosure. The landlord must disclose that a consumer report will be obtained and get written consent before pulling it; the applicant may decline and withdraw.
- Right to an adverse action notice. If the report causes any adverse action — rejection, a higher deposit, or added requirements — the applicant is owed a notice identifying the consumer reporting agency and explaining dispute rights.
- Right to a free copy of the report. When an adverse action is taken, the applicant may obtain a free copy of the report from the agency, generally within sixty days.
- Right to dispute inaccuracies. The applicant may dispute inaccurate information with the agency, which must investigate, generally within thirty days, and correct or remove anything it cannot substantiate.
- Right to a fee receipt and refund. Under section 521-46 the applicant may request a receipt and breakdown of the screening-fee costs, and any unused portion of the fee must be returned within thirty days.
Takeaway
Every Hawaii applicant has the right to consent disclosure, an adverse action notice, a free copy of the report, a dispute investigation, and a screening-fee receipt and refund. These federal Fair Credit Reporting Act rights, plus Hawaii’s section 521-46 fee protections, are the backstop against an inaccurate or improperly used screening report.
The Hawaii Screening Workflow
A disciplined, day-by-day workflow is what turns the legal requirements into a repeatable process that consistently produces defensible decisions. The exact timing can flex, but the sequence — disclose, consent, report, decide, notice — should not. A fuller walkthrough of each stage lives in our how to screen a tenant step-by-step guide, and the underlying paperwork is covered in our rental application guide for landlords.
| Day | Stage | What happens |
|---|---|---|
| Day zero | Application | Standardized application, section 521-46 screening-fee disclosure kept to actual cost with a receipt, and written criteria given to the applicant up front. |
| Day one | Consent form | Signed Fair Credit Reporting Act consent — standalone, clear, and conspicuous, describing what will be gathered. |
| Day two | Run report | Order through an FCRA-compliant consumer reporting agency and review it against the written criteria. |
| Day three | Decision | Apply the consistent criteria; if the report drives an adverse decision, send the pre-adverse action notice. |
| Day ten | Final action | Approve and lease, or deliver the adverse action notice with the agency identification and full disclosures; refund any unused fee within thirty days. |
Takeaway
Run screening as a fixed sequence — disclose, consent, report, decide, notice. Give criteria and a fee receipt up front, keep the fee to actual cost, get standalone written consent, pull from an FCRA-compliant agency, apply the same criteria to everyone, and send the pre-adverse and adverse action notices whenever a report drives the decision.
Compliant Versus Non-Compliant Screening
✓ Defensible Screening
- Standalone written consent signed before the report is pulled.
- Screening fee kept to actual cost under section 521-46, receipted and refunded.
- Written criteria shared with applicants up front.
- Same criteria applied to every applicant consistently.
- Voucher holders screened neutrally, never refused for the voucher itself.
- Pre-adverse and adverse action notices with the report copy and summary of rights.
- Individualized criminal-record review that follows HUD guidance.
- Records retained for the statute-of-limitations period.
✕ Liability Exposure
- Oral or implied consent for a credit check.
- Screening fee above actual cost or no refund of the unused portion.
- No written criteria given to applicants.
- Inconsistent criteria across applicants.
- No-voucher advertising or policy under Act 310.
- Silent rejection with no adverse action notice.
- Blanket criminal-record bans.
- No retention of consent forms or decision rationale.
Common Hawaii Screening Scenarios
The rules become concrete when applied to real situations. Each of the following turns on the same handful of principles — written consent, the actual-cost fee, the adverse action notice, consistent criteria, source-of-income protection, and individualized criminal review. A deeper treatment of the criminal-history piece is in our guide to criminal history in tenant screening.
| Scenario | How the law treats it |
|---|---|
| Report pulled on an oral okay, no signed consent | Fair Credit Reporting Act section 604 violation — consent must be written and conspicuous |
| Screening fee of seventy-five dollars when the report cost thirty-five | Section 521-46 violation — the unused excess must be refunded within thirty days |
| Rejection after a credit check, no notice sent | Fair Credit Reporting Act section 615 violation — the adverse action notice is mandatory |
| Advertising “no Section 8” on a portfolio of ten units | Act 310 source-of-income violation — a fine of up to two thousand dollars for a first offense |
| Auto-rejection for any felony, regardless of age | HUD disparate-impact problem — a blanket ban with no individualized review |
| Approving an applicant with a ten-year-old theft conviction and steady work | HUD-compliant individualized assessment — rehabilitation and age of offense weighed |
Screen Every Applicant the Compliant Way
The best defense against a screening claim is a clean, consistent process. Comprehensive credit, income, and eviction-history reports, run through an FCRA-compliant agency with proper consent and adverse action workflows, protect both your decision and your applicant’s rights.
The Hawaii Landlord Screening Compliance Playbook
Hawaii landlords who follow this playbook virtually never face a Fair Credit Reporting Act or fair-housing claim. The list is short, but every item is load-bearing. Build it into your standard operating procedure and the liability largely disappears.
Disclose the fee, keep it to actual cost, and give a receipt
Use a standardized application, keep the screening fee within the section 521-46 actual-cost limit, provide a receipt and cost breakdown on request, charge only at processing and only adults or emancipated minors, and refund any unused portion within thirty days.
Publish written criteria and get standalone consent
Give every applicant the written screening criteria up front, and obtain written consent on a standalone form — never buried in the application — describing the credit, criminal, and eviction checks. Retain the consent for at least five years.
Use an FCRA-compliant agency and apply criteria consistently
Order through an FCRA-compliant consumer reporting agency only, apply the written criteria identically to every applicant in the same posture, and never use information older than the Fair Credit Reporting Act allows.
Assess criminal history individually and honor source-of-income protection
Never use a blanket criminal ban; work the HUD factors and document the analysis. Never advertise or apply a no-voucher rule under Act 310, and measure income against the tenant’s own share of rent for a voucher holder.
Handle adverse action correctly and retain the paper
Send a pre-adverse action notice with the report copy and summary of rights, wait a reasonable period, then send the adverse action notice identifying the agency. Retain notices and proof of delivery, and never retaliate against an applicant who disputes a report.
The compliance payoff is zero exposure
A Hawaii landlord with written consent, a fee kept to actual cost, consistent criteria, and compliant adverse action procedures essentially eliminates class-action risk under the Fair Credit Reporting Act and a discrimination claim under fair-housing law. The cost is a few extra forms and disciplined record-keeping; the legal protection is comprehensive. For the ranking framework behind who to approve, see our rental application guide for landlords.
Defensible Versus Unlawful: Common Scenarios
✓ Usually Defensible
- Standalone written consent. A signed, conspicuous consent form obtained before any report is pulled, kept on file.
- Actual-cost screening fee. A fee tied to the documented cost of the report, receipted, and refunded where unused within thirty days.
- Consistent neutral criteria. A written credit, income, and rental-history standard applied identically to every applicant, including voucher holders.
- Individualized criminal review. Weighing the nature, age, and relevance of an offense against rehabilitation, documented for each applicant.
✕ Likely Unlawful
- Report on an oral okay. Pulling a consumer report with no signed, conspicuous consent form.
- Overcharged fee. Charging more than the actual cost of screening or pocketing the unused portion.
- No-voucher policy. Refusing or advertising against a Housing Choice Voucher holder, unlawful for covered landlords under Act 310.
- Blanket criminal ban. Auto-rejecting any record with no individualized assessment.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much can a landlord charge for a tenant screening fee in Hawaii?
Under Act 200, codified at Hawaii Revised Statutes section 521-46 and effective May 1, 2024, a landlord may not charge an application screening fee that is more than the actual cost of obtaining the information about the applicant. Hawaii does not set a fixed dollar cap the way some states do; instead the fee is limited to the landlord’s real out-of-pocket cost for the credit report, tenant report, criminal background check, or personal reference checks. Any amount of the fee not used for those authorized purposes must be returned to the applicant within thirty days after the landlord submits the screening request, and the landlord must provide a receipt and a breakdown of the costs on request. The fee may be charged only at the time the application is processed and only to an adult eighteen or older or an emancipated minor who is applying to rent. Charging a screening fee is optional, and a contract clause that forces one may be unenforceable. Verify the current rule with the Hawaii Office of Consumer Protection before charging.
When must a Hawaii landlord refund a tenant screening fee?
Under Hawaii Revised Statutes section 521-46, a landlord or the landlord’s agent must return to the applicant any portion of the screening fee that is not actually used for the authorized purposes within thirty days after the landlord submits the screening request. Because the fee is capped at the actual cost of obtaining the information, any excess collected above that real cost is an unused amount that must be refunded. If the landlord never runs a report, the entire fee is unused and must be returned. On request, the landlord must also give the applicant a receipt and an itemized breakdown of what the fee covered, so an applicant can see whether the amount charged matched the true cost.
Is a Hawaii landlord required to charge a tenant screening fee?
No. Hawaii Revised Statutes section 521-46 permits a landlord to charge a tenant screening fee to recover the actual cost of screening, but it does not require one, and many landlords absorb the cost themselves. The Hawaii Office of Consumer Protection has explained that because the fee is optional, a term in a real estate contract that purports to force a landlord to charge a screening fee may be unenforceable or void as against public policy. When a landlord does charge a fee, it must stay within the actual-cost limit, be receipted on request, be charged only at the time the application is processed, and any unused portion must be refunded within thirty days.
Does Hawaii require written consent before a tenant background check?
Yes, through federal law. The federal Fair Credit Reporting Act, at section 604, requires an applicant’s written consent before a landlord may obtain a consumer report, including a credit report, criminal background check, or eviction-history report from a consumer reporting agency. The consent must be clear and conspicuous, and the best practice is a standalone consent form rather than a clause buried in the rental application. An applicant may decline consent and withdraw. Pulling a report on nothing more than an oral okay is a Fair Credit Reporting Act violation that exposes the landlord to statutory and actual damages plus mandatory attorney fees.
Can a Hawaii landlord refuse a Housing Choice Voucher (Section 8) holder?
Generally no. Since May 1, 2023, Hawaii law under Act 310, codified at Hawaii Revised Statutes section 368F-2, prohibits discrimination against an applicant or tenant based on their participation in the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program or a permanent supportive housing program. A covered landlord may not advertise that vouchers are not accepted, refuse to rent because of the voucher, or impose rental conditions different from those required of other applicants. The protection is enforced by the Hawaii Civil Rights Commission, and a first violation can carry a fine of up to two thousand dollars. The law applies chiefly to landlords above a size threshold, reported as owning more than four rental units, with some exemptions, so verify how it applies to a specific property. A landlord may still screen a voucher holder on neutral, consistent criteria, but the voucher itself cannot be the reason for denial.
Can a landlord reject an applicant for a criminal record in Hawaii?
A Hawaii landlord may consider criminal history, but not through a blanket ban. Federal HUD guidance issued in 2016 holds that a blanket refusal to rent to anyone with any record can violate the Fair Housing Act as disparate-impact discrimination, because criminal records disproportionately affect Black and Hispanic applicants, and a decision based solely on an arrest that never led to a conviction is especially vulnerable. The landlord should make an individualized assessment weighing the nature and severity of the offense, how long ago it occurred, evidence of rehabilitation, and its relevance to tenancy, applied consistently to every applicant. Hawaii has no statewide or local ban-the-box or fair-chance law for housing, so this HUD and Fair Housing Act standard is the controlling framework. Note that Hawaii’s seven-year felony and five-year misdemeanor look-back rule applies to employment under section 378-2.5, not to housing.
Does Hawaii have a ban-the-box law for housing?
No. Hawaii is well known for its employment ban-the-box law, section 378-2.5, which limits when and how far back an employer may consider criminal convictions, but that statute governs hiring, not rental housing. There is no Hawaii statewide fair-chance housing ordinance and no county housing ban-the-box ordinance that removes the criminal-history question from rental applications. For tenant screening, a Hawaii landlord instead follows the federal Fair Housing Act and HUD’s 2016 guidance, which require an individualized assessment rather than a blanket criminal ban and prohibit decisions based solely on an arrest without a conviction. Do not assume the employment look-back windows apply to a rental decision.
What are the protected classes under Hawaii fair housing law?
Hawaii’s fair housing statute, chapter 515 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, makes it a discriminatory practice to refuse a real estate transaction based on race, sex including gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, color, religion, marital status, familial status, ancestry, disability, age, or human immunodeficiency virus infection. Those overlap with and extend beyond the seven federal Fair Housing Act classes of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, familial status, and disability. Separately, since May 1, 2023, Act 310 protects participation in a housing voucher or permanent supportive housing program as a source of income. Note that arrest and court-record protection exists in Hawaii under employment law, not housing law. Screening criteria must be facially neutral, applied consistently, and must not produce a disparate impact on any protected class.
Does a rejected Hawaii applicant get a copy of the screening report?
Yes, under federal law. When a landlord takes an adverse action based even in part on a consumer report, the Fair Credit Reporting Act requires an adverse action notice identifying the consumer reporting agency and explaining the applicant’s rights, and it gives the applicant the right to a free copy of the report from that agency, generally within sixty days. Before finalizing the rejection the landlord should send a pre-adverse action notice with a copy of the report and the Fair Credit Reporting Act summary of rights, and wait a reasonable period so the applicant can dispute an error. Separately, under Hawaii Revised Statutes section 521-46 a landlord must give a receipt and a breakdown of screening-fee costs on request. Skipping the adverse action notice is a Fair Credit Reporting Act violation.
Where can I file a fair housing or screening complaint in Hawaii?
An applicant who believes a screening decision was discriminatory can file with the Hawaii Civil Rights Commission at the state level, or with the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development at the federal level. The Hawaii Civil Rights Commission also enforces the Act 310 source-of-income protection for voucher holders. Complaints about a tenant screening fee that exceeded actual cost or was not refunded can go to the Hawaii Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs Office of Consumer Protection, which administers Hawaii Revised Statutes section 521-46. There are filing deadlines, so a complaint should be made promptly, and a tenant can also raise a fair-housing or Fair Credit Reporting Act violation as a claim or defense in court, where damages and attorney fees may be available.
What penalties apply for tenant screening violations in Hawaii?
The exposure is layered. Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, a willful violation carries statutory damages of one hundred to one thousand dollars per violation plus actual and punitive damages, a negligent violation carries actual damages, and both carry mandatory attorney fees, which is what drives class actions. Under Hawaii’s chapter 515 fair housing law, a discriminatory practice can bring actual damages, civil penalties, and attorney fees through the Hawaii Civil Rights Commission, and repeat federal Fair Housing Act violations can carry escalating civil penalties and injunctive relief. A first violation of the Act 310 source-of-income protection can carry a fine of up to two thousand dollars. Overcharging or failing to refund a screening fee violates Hawaii Revised Statutes section 521-46.
How far back can a Hawaii tenant screening report reach?
Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, most negative items on a consumer report have a seven-year reporting window, while bankruptcies may be reported for ten years. Civil judgments, paid tax liens, and most collection accounts fall under the seven-year rule. A landlord should never base a decision on information older than the Fair Credit Reporting Act allows, and an applicant can dispute stale or inaccurate items with the consumer reporting agency, which must investigate, generally within thirty days, and correct or delete anything it cannot verify. Do not confuse this with Hawaii’s seven-year felony and five-year misdemeanor look-back rule, which applies to employment decisions under section 378-2.5, not to tenant screening.
What is the best way to screen a tenant in Hawaii?
A defensible Hawaii screening process combines a standardized application and a screening-fee disclosure that follows Hawaii Revised Statutes section 521-46, a standalone written consent form, an FCRA-compliant consumer reporting agency, written criteria applied consistently, credit and income verification, rental-history and eviction checks, an individualized criminal-history assessment where relevant, respect for Act 310 source-of-income protection, and proper pre-adverse and adverse action notices when a report drives a rejection. Our how to screen a tenant step-by-step guide walks each stage in order, and following that sequence keeps the process both predictive of a good tenancy and compliant with Hawaii and federal law. Verify the current statute before you rely on any single figure here.
What should a Hawaii landlord know about security deposits when screening?
Screening and deposits connect because a landlord collects the deposit from the approved applicant, and Hawaii has specific rules on deposit amounts, holding, itemized deductions, and the return deadline. Note also that requiring a higher deposit because of information in a screening report is itself an adverse action under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, so it triggers the adverse action notice, not just an outright rejection. Review our Hawaii security deposit laws guide for compliant deposit handling, and treat any report-driven deposit increase as a step that must be disclosed to the applicant.
FCRA-Compliant Hawaii Screening Without the Headaches
Get comprehensive credit, income, and eviction reports on every applicant — with automated consent, compliant adverse action workflows, and complete audit trails. Zero monthly fees; pay only per report.
Related Hawaii Guides and Resources
Published by Tenant Screening Background Check
Established 2004 · 20+ Years · All U.S. States & Territories · Statute-Based · Attorney-Reviewed
A Private Eye Reports™ service trusted by landlords, property managers, and attorneys.
