State Law Reference Hub · Updated 2026

Tenant Screening Laws by State: The Landlord’s Compliance Map

Tenant screening runs on a federal floor of the FCRA and the Fair Housing Act, but every state and many cities add their own layer. This hub explains the rule categories every landlord must check, then links a screening guide for all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Screening a renter anywhere in the United States starts from the same two federal laws and then bends to the state and the city the property sits in. The federal process is constant; the state and local overlay is what changes, and missing one local rule is how an otherwise careful landlord ends up with a fair housing complaint or a refunded screening fee they did not expect.

This guide does two things. First, it explains the categories of state and local screening rules so you know what to look for in any jurisdiction. Second, it gives you a 50-state-plus-DC table that links a dedicated screening-law guide for each state. If you are new to the process itself, our walkthrough of how to screen tenants step by step pairs naturally with the rules below.

▶

Video: a plain-language walkthrough of how state and local screening laws layer on top of the federal FCRA and Fair Housing Act floor.

Key Takeaways: Tenant Screening Laws by State

• Federal law is the floor, not the ceiling. The FCRA and the Fair Housing Act apply everywhere; states and cities add requirements on top that are almost always additional, never substitutes.
• Five recurring state-and-local categories: source-of-income protection, fair-chance criminal-history limits, eviction-record restrictions, application-fee caps, and credit-use limits, plus state-specific disclosures.
• City law often goes further than state law, so a clean state-level check is not enough; confirm your county and city ordinances too.
• One screening structure, fifty overlays. Keep the federal core constant and apply each state’s rules from the table below, where every state and DC links to its own guide.

The Two-Layer Structure: Federal Floor, State and Local Additions

Every tenant screening decision in the United States sits on top of two federal laws. The Fair Credit Reporting Act governs how you obtain and act on a consumer report, including the written authorization you must collect and the adverse action notice you must send. The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of its seven protected classes: race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status, and disability.

Those set the national floor. Then states build on top, and within states, cities and counties build further still. The critical principle for landlords is that state and local rules are almost always additional requirements, not replacements. Complying with the FCRA does not excuse you from your state’s screening-fee cap, and complying with your state law does not excuse you from a stricter city ordinance.

That is why a landlord with properties in several places cannot run one screening policy everywhere. The federal process stays constant; the state and local overlay changes with the property’s location, which is exactly what the table further down this page is built to help you manage.

The FCRA: Permissible Purpose and Adverse Action

Pulling a screening report on an applicant is lawful because tenant screening is a permissible purpose under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, but only when you have the applicant’s written authorization and a genuine rental transaction. You may use the report only to evaluate that applicant for housing; using it for anything else, or pulling it without consent, is exactly the kind of misuse the FCRA was written to stop.

The other half of the FCRA duty is adverse action. Whenever information in a consumer report contributes, in whole or in part, to a denial or to less favorable terms, such as a higher deposit or a required co-signer, you must give the applicant an adverse action notice. That notice names the screening company, states clearly that the company did not make the decision, and tells the applicant they have the right to a free copy of the report and the right to dispute anything inaccurate in it. Our adverse action notice guide walks through the required elements, and several states add content on top of the federal baseline.

Category 1: Source-of-Income Protection

One of the fastest-growing categories of state and local law is source-of-income protection, which means a landlord cannot refuse an applicant solely because their lawful income comes from a particular source. Most commonly the protected source is a Housing Choice Voucher (Section 8), but the protection often also reaches Social Security, disability income, veterans’ benefits, child support, and other lawful non-wage income.

As of 2026, roughly twenty states have statewide source-of-income protection and a large and growing number of cities and counties have their own ordinances. This is a category where city law frequently exists even when state law does not, so the local level always deserves a separate check.

Category 2: Criminal History and Fair-Chance Rules

How criminal history may be used in screening is in a period of real change at the federal level. HUD’s 2016 Office of General Counsel guidance on the use of criminal records in housing was withdrawn effective September 25, 2025 (Docket No. FR-6617-N-01, published July 17, 2026), with no successor, and companion fair-housing guidance documents were withdrawn in the same and parallel notices. Separately, HUD’s January 14, 2026 proposal to remove the rule is still only a proposal, and a supplemental proposed rule published August 10, 2026 reopened the comment period through October 9, 2026. None of that repeals the Fair Housing Act itself, and courts continue to apply disparate-impact analysis under the statute, so a blanket criminal screen still carries fair housing risk even with the guidance withdrawn.

On top of the federal picture, a growing number of states and cities have enacted specific fair-chance housing laws that go further. They vary widely but commonly include some combination of:

• Timing limits that bar a criminal-history inquiry until after a conditional offer, or until later in the screening process.
• Lookback limits that restrict how far back you may consider convictions.
• Individualized assessment requirements that make you weigh the nature, age, and relevance of an offense instead of applying a blanket ban.
• Exclusion of certain records such as arrests not leading to conviction, sealed or expunged records, and juvenile records.
• Notice and appeal rights that require telling the applicant what record drove the decision and giving them a chance to respond.

Category 3: Eviction-Record Restrictions

Eviction filings are a standard part of tenant screening reports, but a number of states and cities now restrict how those records may be used. The common restrictions in this category are:

• Lookback limits that bar consideration of eviction filings older than a set number of years.
• A filing-versus-judgment distinction that restricts use of eviction filings which did not result in a judgment against the tenant, or that were dismissed or settled.
• Sealed-record rules under which some jurisdictions seal certain eviction records, making them unavailable for screening.
• Pandemic-era protections, since several jurisdictions enacted lasting rules around evictions filed during specific periods.

The underlying concern these laws address is that an eviction filing is not the same as a tenant who did something wrong. Cases are filed and then dismissed, settled, or decided for the tenant, so jurisdictions with these rules require landlords to look at the outcome and the age of the record, not just its existence.

Category 4: Application-Fee Caps and Screening-Fee Rules

Many states regulate what a landlord may charge an applicant for screening, and what must happen to that money. The rules cluster into a few predictable shapes.

Category 5: Credit-Information Use Limits and Disclosures

Credit-based screening is lawful under federal law, but a growing number of jurisdictions place limits on how credit information may be used in housing decisions. Rules in this category can include restrictions or prohibitions on using credit scores for applicants who use housing assistance, requirements to consider credit information in context rather than applying a hard cutoff, requirements to let applicants provide explanatory information about negative items, and an interaction with source-of-income protection, where a credit standard cannot be used as an indirect way to screen out voucher holders.

Beyond credit, many states impose disclosure and notice obligations of their own. These can include requiring landlords to give applicants the screening criteria in advance, adding state-specific content to the adverse action notice beyond the federal elements, granting report-copy rights, requiring acceptance of a recent reusable report the applicant already paid for, and mandating a state-specific notice of applicant rights. For the principles behind credit-based screening and why the full report matters more than the score, see our minimum credit score guide.

Tenant Screening Laws by State: All 50 States and DC

Use the table below as your jump-off point. Each state links to a dedicated guide covering how that state layers its source-of-income, fair-chance, eviction-record, fee, and disclosure rules on top of the federal floor. Pick the state your property sits in, then confirm any city or county ordinance, because local law in these categories frequently goes further than the state.

How to Build a Compliant Multi-Jurisdiction Process

If you operate in more than one state, or even more than one city, the goal is a process that stays consistent in its structure while correctly applying each location’s overlay. The federal framework of consistent criteria, proper authorization, adverse action notices, and documentation is what makes any screening process defensible; the state and local overlay is what keeps it lawful in your specific location, and you need both.

What Is FCRA-Compliant Tenant Screening?

FCRA-compliant tenant screening means obtaining and using a rental applicant’s consumer report the way the Fair Credit Reporting Act allows: with a permissible purpose under 15 U.S.C. section 1681b(a)(3)(F)(i), through a consumer reporting agency that holds your certification of that purpose, judged against written criteria applied to every applicant alike, and followed by an adverse action notice under section 1681m(a) whenever the report contributes to a denial or to less favorable terms.

Section 1681b(a)(3)(F)(i) grants that permissible purpose as a legitimate business need in connection with a business transaction the consumer initiated, and section 1681b(f) forbids obtaining a report unless it is for a purpose authorized under section 1681b and certified in accordance with section 1681e.

One genuine federal pre-report duty can still reach a landlord. Under section 1681d(a), where an investigative consumer report is ordered — information about character, general reputation or mode of living gathered through personal interviews — written notice must be delivered no later than three days after the report was first requested. California puts a parallel three-day duty in Civil Code section 1786.16(a)(3) for a report sought in connection with the hiring of a dwelling unit.

What Must an FCRA Adverse-Action Notice Say?

Section 1681m(a) requires four things in the notice: that adverse action was taken; the name, address and telephone number of the consumer reporting agency that furnished the report, including its toll-free number if the agency reports nationwide; a statement that the agency did not make the decision and cannot explain the specific reasons for it; and notice of the applicant’s right to a free copy of the report from that agency within sixty days and to dispute anything inaccurate or incomplete in it.

The sixty-day clock has its own statutory home. Section 1681j(b) gives the applicant a free file disclosure from the agency if it is requested not later than sixty days after receiving the section 1681m notification, so the notice is the event that starts the count.

The trigger is wider than a rejection. Section 1681a(k)(1)(B)(iv) defines adverse action as any action made in connection with an application by a consumer that is adverse to that consumer’s interests, and section 1681m(a) attaches whenever a decision rests on a consumer report in whole or in part, so a larger deposit, a higher rent, or a required co-signer each owe the notice as squarely as a denial. Section 1681m(c) supplies the one express defense: no liability for a violation of section 1681m where the landlord shows by a preponderance of the evidence that reasonable procedures to assure compliance were maintained at the time, which turns on the template and the routine rather than on one file’s outcome.

States build on that element list rather than replacing it, and the additions come from the state FCRA equivalents, the “mini-FCRA” statutes — California’s CCRAA and ICRAA, or New York’s GBL section 380 — which add requirements on top of the federal floor. California requires the same notice in writing under Civil Code section 1785.20(a), part of the CCRAA; Colorado adds a written denial notice and, where the application produced a consumer report, a copy of that report with a dispute advisement under section 38-12-904(2)(a)(I)(B); Oregon adds a statement of reasons within fourteen days under section 90.304.

What Are the Penalties for Violating the FCRA?

A willful violation exposes a landlord under section 1681n to the applicant’s actual damages or statutory damages of not less than one hundred and not more than one thousand dollars per violation — section 1681n(a)(1)(A) makes those alternatives, not a sum — plus any punitive damages the court allows under section 1681n(a)(2) and the costs of a successful action with reasonable attorney fees under section 1681n(a)(3); a negligent violation under section 1681o carries actual damages plus costs and reasonable attorney fees, with no statutory-damages floor and no punitive damages.

Statutory damages need no proof of harm, which is why willfulness is the fought-over question in these cases and why a single non-compliant form or a habitually skipped notice compounds across every application it touched.

Improper access carries its own tier. Under section 1681n(a)(1)(B) a natural person who obtains a report under false pretenses or knowingly without a permissible purpose is liable to the consumer, and section 1681n(b) makes that person liable to the consumer reporting agency as well. One improper pull runs liability in two directions.

Fee-shifting is what drives the litigation, and it runs both ways: sections 1681n(a)(3) and 1681o(a)(2) award costs and reasonable attorney fees to a consumer who wins, while sections 1681n(c) and 1681o(b) send fees to the prevailing party where a pleading was filed in bad faith or for harassment. State screening statutes stack their own remedies on top — Colorado attaches a per-violation penalty plus court costs and attorney fees under Colorado Revised Statutes section 38-12-905(1), and Oregon attaches statutory damages to a screening-charge failure under section 90.295(6)(b). Colorado’s penalty is not unconditional: it drops where the landlord cures the violation within seven days of receiving notice, and the applicant must notify the landlord at least seven calendar days before filing the action (section 38-12-905(3) and (2)).

How Long Should You Keep a Screening Report, and How Must You Dispose of It?

The FTC Disposal Rule at 16 CFR 682.3(a) requires any person who possesses consumer information for a business purpose to dispose of it by taking reasonable measures to protect against unauthorized access or use in connection with disposal, which for a landlord means shredding, burning or secure erasure rather than a recycling bin or a deleted folder.

The rule reaches an ordinary landlord squarely. Consumer information is defined at 16 CFR 682.1(b) as any record about an individual, in paper, electronic or other form, that is a consumer report or is derived from one, and 16 CFR 682.2(b) applies the rule to any person under FTC jurisdiction who holds that information for a business purpose. A single applicant file containing one screening report is inside the definition. FCRA section 1681w is the provision that directed federal agencies to write proper-disposal rules for consumer information in the first place.

Retention is the harder half, because the FCRA sets no single holding period for a landlord’s screening file. The workable default is to keep the decision file intact — the application, the signed authorization, the report, the written criteria applied, the reason tied to a specific criterion, and a copy of any adverse action notice sent — for as long as a related claim could still be brought where the property sits, then dispose of the screening portion under 16 CFR 682.3 when it is let go.

Which FCRA Duties Are Yours, and Which Belong to the Screening Company?

Under the FCRA a landlord is the user of a consumer report and the screening company is the consumer reporting agency, and the duties do not overlap: the landlord must hold a permissible purpose, certify it, and send the adverse action notice, while the agency must follow reasonable procedures, obey the reporting time limits, and reinvestigate a disputed item — generally within thirty days under section 1681i.

Three of the agency’s duties run directly to the landlord and are worth knowing by name. Section 1681e(a) obliges the agency to obtain the user’s certification of purpose, verify a new user’s identity and stated uses, and refuse a report where it has reasonable grounds to believe the purpose is not a permissible one. Section 1681e(d)(1)(B) obliges it to give every user a notice of that user’s own responsibilities under the Act, the Notice to Users of Consumer Reports; if a provider never sent one, ask for it. Section 1681e(c) bars an agency from prohibiting a user from disclosing the report’s contents to the consumer once adverse action has been taken on it.

Reporting time limits are the agency’s job, not yours, but they shape what you may rely on. Section 1681c caps bankruptcies at ten years and most other adverse items — civil judgments, paid tax liens, collection and charged-off accounts, arrest records — at seven. Records of criminal conviction have no federal time limit, though many states impose their own seven-year cap. An item on a report older than its limit is a possible data error: do not act on it, and tell the agency.

The reinvestigation is squarely the agency’s. When an applicant says an item is wrong, the landlord is not the investigator, and where timing allows, letting the section 1681i reinvestigation run is a stronger position than denying over a contested item.

Denied Because of a Tenant Screening Report? How the Dispute Works

An applicant denied because of a tenant screening report can request a free copy of the file from the consumer reporting agency named in the adverse action notice within sixty days under section 1681j(b), dispute anything inaccurate or incomplete with that agency, which must generally reinvestigate within thirty days under section 1681i, and have anything the agency cannot verify corrected or deleted.

Naming the agency is the whole point of the notice, so an applicant who received one already has the address to write to. An applicant who received no notice at all still has the route: ask the landlord which screening company furnished the report, then take the dispute to that company.

Several states give an applicant more than the federal floor. Minnesota section 504B.241 lets an applicant see the tenant screening file and its sources, free where the report was used within the past thirty days to deny the rental or raise the deposit or rent, and forces the service to reinvestigate, delete anything inaccurate or unverifiable, and notify prior recipients. California Civil Code section 1950.6(f) requires a landlord who charged a screening fee to deliver a copy of the consumer credit report to the applicant within seven days of the landlord receiving it, whatever the outcome. Colorado section 38-12-904(2)(a)(I)(B) requires the denial notice, where the application produced a consumer report, to carry a copy of that report and an advisement of the right to dispute its accuracy.

For a landlord the practical reading is that a documented dispute is a reason to pause rather than to hurry, and that the fee-shifting provisions at sections 1681n(a)(3) and 1681o(a)(2) are why an applicant denied on a report they were never told about can readily find a consumer-law attorney to bring the claim.

Which States Require Your Screening Criteria in Writing Before You Charge a Fee?

Several states turn written screening criteria from best practice into a legal precondition: Texas Property Code section 92.3515 requires printed notice of the tenant selection criteria and the grounds for denial at the time an applicant is handed a rental application; Washington RCW 59.18.257 requires written notice of what will be checked and the criteria that could lead to denial; and Oregon section 90.295(3) requires a landlord to adopt written screening or admission criteria and hand the applicant a written notice before accepting any payment.

Oregon itemizes what that notice must contain. The section 90.295(3) notice must state the amount of the charge, the criteria, the screening process, the applicant’s right to dispute the accuracy of information supplied by a screening company or credit reporting agency, any right to appeal, the nondiscrimination policy, the rent and deposit amounts, and any renter’s liability insurance requirement.

Two of the three statutes tie the notice to the money, so the sequence is the compliance point rather than the paperwork. In Washington and Oregon a screening fee collected before the criteria notice went out is collected unlawfully however sound the criteria are, and Texas Property Code section 92.3515(e) requires the application fee and any application deposit to be returned where an applicant is rejected without the criteria notice having been made available.

A criterion fixed in writing before the advertisement runs is the only kind you can later prove you applied identically, so write the standard as a short list in which every line is a number or a yes-or-no fact rather than a judgment: an income threshold, commonly gross monthly income of at least two-and-a-half to three times the rent; a minimum credit expectation; a rental-history standard; an employment or income-stability requirement; and stated pet, smoking and criminal-record policies. Eviction records belong on the list as prior filings and judgments, within the reporting time limits and any state restrictions. Criminal records get an individualized assessment rather than a blanket ban — convictions rather than arrests, the nature and recency of the offense, its relationship to safety, and any local fair-chance rule.

The income line is the one that moves with the jurisdiction. Colorado section 38-12-904(1)(d) bars requiring an applicant renting without a subsidy to have an annual income above two hundred percent of the annual rent, so the two-and-a-half to three times the rent multiple above is unlawful there, except where a governmental, quasi-governmental or nonprofit funder requires income-qualifying for an income-restricted unit. The screening best-practices checklist covers building that one written standard.

Tenant Screening Laws by State: FAQ

Do federal screening laws or state screening laws control?

Both, because they layer. The Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Fair Housing Act set the national floor, and state and local laws add requirements on top. State and local rules are almost always additional, not substitutes: complying with federal law does not excuse you from a state fee cap, and complying with state law does not excuse you from a stricter city ordinance. You must satisfy every applicable layer.

What is source-of-income protection?

It is a state or local law prohibiting a landlord from refusing an applicant solely because their lawful income comes from a particular source, most often a Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher, but frequently also Social Security, disability, veterans’ benefits, or child support. You can still verify the income is real and sufficient; you just cannot reject it for being non-wage income. Roughly twenty states and many cities and counties have these laws as of 2026.

Can I refuse to rent to anyone with a criminal record?

A blanket “no criminal record” policy is one of the most legally exposed positions a landlord can take. Although HUD’s 2016 criminal-records guidance was withdrawn effective September 25, 2025 and HUD has proposed removing its disparate-impact rule at 24 CFR 100.500, with the comment period reopened through October 9, 2026, the Fair Housing Act itself is unchanged and courts still apply disparate-impact analysis, so a blanket ban remains risky. Many states and cities also have fair-chance housing laws that restrict or prohibit blanket bans. Individualized assessment is the defensible approach.

Are there limits on using eviction records in screening?

In a growing number of states and cities, yes. Common restrictions include lookback limits that bar consideration of filings older than a set number of years, distinctions between eviction filings and actual judgments that restrict use of dismissed or settled cases, and sealed-record rules. The principle is that an eviction filing is not proof the tenant did something wrong, so outcome and age matter.

How much can I charge for a rental application fee?

It depends on your state. Many states cap the screening fee at a fixed amount or limit it to the landlord’s actual screening cost, and some require itemized receipts or refunds in certain circumstances. Applicant-paid screening, where the applicant pays the screening company directly, reduces much of this fee-handling complexity, but you still need to know your state’s rules.

Do I have to give applicants my screening criteria?

In some states, yes. They require landlords to disclose screening criteria to applicants, sometimes in advance. Some states also require providing a copy of the screening report, accepting a recent reusable report the applicant already paid for, or including state-specific content in the adverse action notice. Check your specific state’s disclosure requirements.

What is the FCRA permissible purpose for tenant screening?

Tenant screening is a permissible purpose under the Fair Credit Reporting Act when you have the applicant’s written authorization and a genuine rental transaction. You must use the report only for evaluating the applicant for housing, and you must send an adverse action notice whenever information in a consumer report contributes, in whole or in part, to a denial or to less favorable terms.

I have properties in several states. Do I need a different screening process for each?

Your core process should stay consistent, built on the federal floor of FCRA authorization, consistent written criteria, and adverse action notices. What changes per jurisdiction is the overlay: source-of-income rules, fair-chance criminal limits, eviction-record restrictions, fee caps, credit-use limits, and disclosure requirements. Maintain a written screening policy per jurisdiction with the same structure and a location-specific overlay, and have a local attorney review each one.

Related Tenant Screening and Compliance Guides

• FCRA landlord guide – authorization, permissible purpose, and adverse action.
• Fair Housing Act guide – the seven protected classes and disparate impact.
• How to screen tenants – the step-by-step screening process.
• Adverse action notice – the required notice when a report drives a denial.
• Verify tenant income – confirm income without an unlawful voucher standard.
• Minimum credit score – why the full report beats a single score.
• Accept or reject applications – making the decision defensibly.
• Application fee laws by state – which states cap, ban or condition the screening fee, with a citation on every row.
• Deposit return deadlines by state – the day count and the event that actually starts the clock.

Screen Consistently Across Every Jurisdiction

Order FCRA-ready credit, criminal, and eviction reports that give you the same complete data set wherever your properties are, so your process stays consistent while you apply each state’s rules.

Start Tenant Screening Compare Report Options

About the Author

Published by Tenant Screening Background Check · Editorial Team

Established 2004. Our editorial team has spent two decades helping landlords and property managers run lawful, FCRA-compliant tenant screening across all 50 states and the District of Columbia. We translate state landlord-tenant codes and federal screening rules into processes you can actually follow.

Updated 2026

Legal Disclaimer

This page provides a general overview of the categories of state and local tenant screening law as of 2026. It is not a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction legal reference, and it is not legal advice. Tenant screening laws change frequently, and city and county ordinances often impose stricter requirements than state law. Federal guidance is also in flux: HUD’s criminal-records guidance was withdrawn effective September 25, 2025 and HUD has proposed removing its disparate-impact rule at 24 CFR 100.500, with comment reopened through October 9, 2026, while the Fair Housing Act itself remains in force. Confirm the current rules for your specific jurisdiction with your state landlord-tenant statutes, your local housing authority, and a licensed attorney in your area. Reading this page does not create an attorney-client relationship.