🏠 Tenant Screening Laws by State (2025)
The definitive guide to application fee limits, criminal background check restrictions, source of income protections, and Fair Housing compliance across all 50 states, Washington D.C., and Puerto Rico.
⚡ Why This Matters in 2025
Tenant screening regulations have undergone dramatic changes over the past five years. Seven states enacted statewide source of income protections between 2019-2022, and New York City’s Fair Chance Housing Act took effect January 1, 2025, fundamentally reshaping how criminal background checks can be used. Whether you’re a landlord seeking compliance or a tenant understanding your rights, navigating these fragmented regulations requires jurisdiction-specific knowledge.
📊 The National Landscape: Tenant Screening at a Glance
The United States lacks a unified federal framework for tenant screening beyond the Fair Housing Act’s anti-discrimination provisions and the Fair Credit Reporting Act’s data accuracy requirements. This regulatory vacuum has produced a patchwork of state and local laws that vary dramatically in their protections for tenants and requirements for landlords. Understanding these differences is essential for anyone involved in the rental housing market.
According to a Georgetown Law study, the national average rental application fee sits at approximately $50 per applicant. However, this figure obscures significant regional variation. In states without fee caps, landlords in competitive urban markets routinely charge $75-$100 or more. Meanwhile, Massachusetts and Vermont have banned application fees entirely, and states like New York cap fees at just $20.
🔢 Application Fee Regulations by Category
💵 Application Fee Limits: State-by-State Breakdown
Rental application fees fund the tenant screening process, covering credit reports, background checks, eviction history searches, and administrative time. While most states impose no statutory limits on these fees, a growing minority have enacted caps or outright bans to protect prospective tenants from excessive charges that can accumulate rapidly when applying to multiple properties.
🚫 States That Ban Application Fees
Only two states have completely prohibited landlords from charging application fees:
- Massachusetts — Under M.G.L. Chapter 186 § 15B, landlords cannot charge prospective tenants any application fee. This prohibition aims to prevent renters from paying multiple non-refundable fees across properties.
- Vermont — State law prohibits application fees entirely, requiring landlords to absorb screening costs or rely on applicant-provided reports.
📉 States with Fee Caps
*California’s fee adjusts annually with CPI. The 2025 maximum is approximately $65.
📋 Complete Application Fee Regulations Table
| State | Fee Limit | Refund? | Key Provision |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | ~$65 (CPI) | ✓ Yes | Must refund unused portion; AB 2493 requires unit availability |
| Delaware | $50 or 10% | Partial | Greater of $50 or 10% of monthly rent |
| Maine | Actual cost | ✓ Yes | Must equal actual screening cost; 2025 disclosure law |
| Massachusetts | BANNED | N/A | No application fees permitted |
| Minnesota | Actual cost | ✓ Yes | Excess must be refunded; fee disclosure required |
| New York | $20 max | No | Statewide cap; NYC has additional Fair Chance rules |
| Vermont | BANNED | N/A | No application fees permitted |
| Virginia | $50 max | No | Cannot charge transaction/service fees |
| Washington | Actual cost | ✓ Yes | Fee must equal exact screening cost |
| Washington D.C. | $50 max | Partial | Additional source of income protections |
| Wisconsin | $25 max | No | Documentation required if claiming higher costs |
⚠️ California’s Unique Requirements (AB 2493)
As of January 1, 2025, California’s AB 2493 mandates that landlords can only charge a screening fee when they have available units AND have already determined an applicant meets their rental criteria. Charging fees when no unit is available—or before evaluating basic qualifications—violates state law.
🏛️ Source of Income Discrimination: The Expanding Frontier
Source of income (SOI) discrimination occurs when landlords refuse to rent to tenants based on their lawful income source—most commonly Housing Choice Vouchers (Section 8), disability benefits, Social Security, or child support payments. While the federal Fair Housing Act does not explicitly prohibit SOI discrimination, a growing number of states and localities have filled this gap.
According to the Poverty & Race Research Action Council (PRRAC), over 60% of voucher holders now live in jurisdictions with SOI protections—up from just 34% in 2018. This dramatic expansion reflects growing recognition that SOI discrimination perpetuates housing segregation and disproportionately harms communities of color, people with disabilities, and female-headed households.
Who’s Protected?
66% of federal Housing Choice Voucher recipients are Black or Latine. 77% of HCV households are female-headed. 26% include a family member with a disability.
Growing Momentum
Seven states enacted SOI protections between 2019-2022: New York, California, Colorado, Rhode Island, Maryland, Virginia, and Illinois. Michigan followed in 2025.
Enforcement Varies
Many states lack adequate enforcement funding, leading to inconsistent protection. Testing programs and proactive monitoring remain limited in most jurisdictions.
✅ States with Statewide Source of Income Protections
💡 What SOI Laws Mean for Landlords
In states with SOI protections, landlords cannot refuse to rent, advertise limitations, or offer different terms based on whether a tenant’s income comes from employment, government assistance, housing vouchers, disability payments, or other lawful sources. Violations can result in fair housing complaints, fines, and civil liability.
🔍 Criminal Background Checks: The Fair Chance Movement
Criminal background screening in housing has come under increasing scrutiny from fair housing advocates, researchers, and policymakers. In 2016, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) issued landmark guidance stating that blanket bans on tenants with criminal records likely violate the Fair Housing Act due to their disparate impact on protected classes—particularly Black and Hispanic applicants.
🚦 HUD’s Key Restrictions
- Arrest-Only Exclusions — Cannot deny housing based solely on arrests without convictions
- Blanket Bans — Automatic rejections for any criminal record violate the Fair Housing Act
- Overbroad Policies — Bans on broad categories or excessive lookback periods are problematic
- Drug Manufacturing — Section 807(b)(4) permits exclusions for drug manufacturing/distribution
📍 Fair Chance Housing Jurisdictions
- New York City — Fair Chance Act effective Jan 1, 2025; 5-year felony / 3-year misdemeanor lookback
- Seattle, WA — Fair Chance law since 2017
- Portland, OR — Municipal Fair Chance law effective 2020
- Oregon (Statewide) — Fair Chance law effective 2019
🗽 NYC Fair Chance Housing Act: What Landlords Must Know
New York City’s Fair Chance for Housing Act (Local Law 24) fundamentally changes tenant screening. Landlords cannot inquire about criminal history until AFTER evaluating all other qualifications and making a conditional offer. Only “reviewable” convictions can be considered: sex offenses, misdemeanors within 3 years, and felonies within 5 years. Older convictions—even for serious crimes—cannot be considered.
⚖️ Fair Housing Act Compliance: Core Requirements
All tenant screening practices must comply with the federal Fair Housing Act, which prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, national origin, sex (including gender identity and sexual orientation), familial status, and disability. Even facially neutral policies can violate the FHA if they have an unjustified disparate impact on protected classes.
Protected Classes
Race, color, religion, national origin, sex, familial status, and disability. Many states add age, marital status, sexual orientation, and source of income.
Disparate Impact
Policies disproportionately affecting protected groups can be illegal even without discriminatory intent—unless justified by business necessity.
Accommodations
Landlords must make reasonable accommodations for tenants with disabilities, including modifying criteria when disability relates to criminal history.
🎯 Best Practices for Landlords: Compliant Screening
Navigating the complex patchwork of tenant screening regulations requires landlords to implement consistent, documented processes that satisfy both federal requirements and state-specific rules. The consequences of non-compliance range from fair housing complaints and civil penalties to costly lawsuits and reputational damage that can affect your ability to attract quality tenants.
Document Everything
Maintain written screening criteria applied consistently to all applicants. Document reasons for denials and retain records for at least three years. Consistent documentation is your primary defense against discrimination claims.
Individualized Assessment
Never apply blanket bans based on criminal history, credit scores, or other factors. Evaluate each applicant’s circumstances individually, considering mitigating factors and evidence of changed circumstances.
Know Your Jurisdiction
Research both state and local laws before screening. Many cities have ordinances exceeding state requirements—particularly for source of income protections and criminal background restrictions.
📋 Screening Process Checklist
- Establish Written Criteria — Define objective, non-discriminatory standards for income requirements, rental history, credit thresholds, and other factors before advertising the unit to any prospective tenants
- Disclose Fees Upfront — Provide applicants with written notice of application fees, what they cover, whether any portion is refundable, and the screening criteria before collecting any payment
- Obtain Written Consent — Secure applicant’s written authorization before pulling credit reports or background checks as required by the Fair Credit Reporting Act
- Evaluate Qualifications First — In Fair Chance jurisdictions, assess financial qualifications, rental history, income, and other criteria before considering any criminal history information
- Conduct Individualized Review — If criminal history is found, consider the nature and severity of the offense, time elapsed since completion of sentence, evidence of rehabilitation, and relevance to tenancy
- Provide Adverse Action Notice — If denying based on consumer report contents, provide written notice including the reporting agency’s contact information and the applicant’s rights to dispute inaccurate information
- Document the Decision — Record specific, objective reasons for approval or denial and retain these records for your files for at least three years to protect against future claims
⚠️ Common Compliance Mistakes to Avoid
Inconsistent Standards: Applying different income requirements or credit thresholds to different applicants invites discrimination claims—always use the same criteria for every applicant. Verbal Denials: Always provide written reasons for rejection—verbal-only denials create legal exposure and prevent applicants from exercising their dispute rights. Prohibited Questions: Never ask about familial status, disability, religion, national origin, or (in many jurisdictions) criminal history before making a conditional offer based on other qualifications.
👥 Know Your Rights: Information for Tenants
Prospective tenants have significant legal protections during the application process, though many remain unaware of their rights under federal, state, and local fair housing laws. Understanding these protections empowers applicants to identify illegal screening practices and seek recourse when discrimination occurs.
🛡️ Your Federal Rights
- Equal Treatment — Same screening criteria must apply to all applicants regardless of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, familial status, or disability
- Reasonable Accommodations — If you have a disability, landlords must make reasonable modifications to screening policies when necessary to afford equal housing opportunity
- Adverse Action Notice — If denied based on consumer reports (credit check, background check), you must receive written notice identifying the reporting agency and your dispute rights
- Free Credit Report — If denied based on credit report, you’re entitled to a free copy from the reporting agency within 60 days of the denial
- Dispute Rights — You have the right to dispute inaccurate information in screening reports and have errors corrected within 30 days
📞 What to Do If You Experience Discrimination
If you believe you’ve experienced discrimination during the rental application process, taking prompt action protects your rights and helps prevent future discrimination against others:
- Document Everything — Save all communications, advertisements, applications, and receipts. Note dates, times, names, and what was said in verbal interactions immediately after they occur
- Request Written Explanation — Ask the landlord for a written explanation of why your application was denied, including the specific criteria you failed to meet
- File a HUD Complaint — Contact HUD at 1-800-669-9777 or file online at hud.gov/fairhousing within one year of the discriminatory act for federal investigation
- Contact Local Agency — Many states and cities have fair housing agencies that investigate complaints and may offer faster resolution or additional remedies
- Consult an Attorney — Fair housing cases may be eligible for attorney fee recovery, making legal representation more accessible even for those with limited resources
📈 2025 Emerging Trends & Legislative Developments
The tenant screening regulatory landscape continues to evolve rapidly as legislatures respond to housing affordability concerns and advocacy efforts. Several significant trends are reshaping how landlords can evaluate prospective tenants and what protections renters can expect.
🔮 Key Trends to Watch
1. Reusable Screening Reports: States like Illinois, California, and Washington now require landlords to accept “portable” or “reusable” tenant screening reports under certain conditions. This reduces costs for tenants applying to multiple properties and streamlines the application process for landlords who can receive pre-verified reports.
2. Algorithmic Screening Scrutiny: HUD and fair housing advocates are increasingly examining whether automated tenant screening algorithms produce discriminatory outcomes, particularly regarding criminal history and credit scoring models that may encode historical biases.
3. Junk Fee Crackdowns: The National Consumer Law Center has identified 27 different types of rental fees that can arise during tenancy. States including Georgia, Illinois, and Minnesota passed legislation addressing excessive rental fees in 2024, and more states are expected to follow.
4. Federal SOI Legislation: The Fair Housing Improvement Act (introduced September 2025) would add source of income and military/veteran status as federally protected classes, providing nationwide protection for voucher holders and veterans seeking housing.
5. Eviction Record Sealing: Following the pandemic, multiple states have enacted or expanded eviction record sealing laws, limiting how landlords can use eviction history in screening decisions and providing a fresh start for tenants who experienced pandemic-related hardships.
📈 Regional Analysis: How Laws Vary Across America
The geographic distribution of tenant screening regulations reveals distinct regional patterns reflecting underlying political and economic factors. Understanding these regional differences is essential for landlords operating in multiple states and tenants considering relocation.
🏙️ West Coast: Most Protective Environment
California, Oregon, and Washington have enacted the most comprehensive tenant screening regulations in the nation. All three states have source of income protections, application fee limits tied to actual costs, and either statewide or significant municipal Fair Chance housing laws. California’s AB 2493 represents the cutting edge of fee regulation, prohibiting landlords from charging screening fees until after determining an applicant meets basic criteria. Oregon’s statewide Fair Chance law limits criminal history consideration, while Seattle and Portland have enacted even stricter municipal ordinances that further restrict landlord discretion in evaluating applicants with criminal records.
🏛️ Northeast: Strong but Varied Protections
The Northeast presents a mixed landscape with some of the strongest protections alongside significant gaps. Massachusetts and Vermont lead nationally with complete bans on application fees and robust source of income protections. New York combines a $20 fee cap with statewide SOI protections, plus New York City’s groundbreaking Fair Chance Housing Act that took effect January 1, 2025. Connecticut, New Jersey, and Rhode Island have strong SOI protections with active enforcement mechanisms. However, New Hampshire and Pennsylvania offer minimal protections beyond federal baseline requirements, creating significant variation within the region that landlords and tenants must navigate carefully.
🌾 Midwest: Emerging Protections
The Midwest shows growing momentum for tenant protections after years of minimal regulation. Michigan enacted statewide source of income protections in 2025, joining Minnesota, Illinois, and North Dakota as states with comprehensive voucher holder protections. Minnesota’s combination of fee refund requirements and SOI protections makes it one of the more protective Midwestern states for renters. Wisconsin caps application fees at $25 but lacks source of income protections, limiting voucher holders’ housing options. Ohio, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, and Missouri maintain minimal state-level regulations, though some municipalities in these states have enacted local ordinances providing additional protections.
🌴 South & Mountain West: Limited Regulation
Southern and Mountain West states generally have the fewest tenant screening regulations in the nation. Texas, Florida, Arizona, and most Southern states impose no fee limits and lack source of income protections at the state level, giving landlords significant discretion in screening practices. Colorado stands as a notable exception among Mountain West states, having enacted statewide SOI protections in 2020 that have expanded housing access for voucher holders. Utah and Oklahoma have limited SOI provisions that provide some protection. Virginia represents a moderate Southern approach with a $50 fee cap and recent SOI protections enacted in 2020. Puerto Rico operates under Civil Code provisions distinct from mainland common law traditions, creating unique considerations for landlords and tenants operating in that jurisdiction.
📊 Understanding the Data: Key Statistics on Tenant Screening
Making informed decisions about tenant screening requires understanding the broader landscape of rental housing discrimination and enforcement. The following statistics from the National Fair Housing Alliance, HUD, and academic research organizations illuminate the current state of tenant screening across the United States and highlight areas where additional attention may be needed.
32,321 Complaints
Fair housing complaints received in 2024, one of the highest figures in more than two decades, though this represents only a fraction of actual discrimination incidents.
60%+ Coverage
More than 60% of Housing Choice Voucher holders now live in jurisdictions with source of income protections—up from just 34% in 2018, a major expansion.
2x Increase
Retaliation complaints more than doubled from 234 in 2023 to 472 in 2024, highlighting growing tenant awareness of their fair housing rights.
💰 The True Cost of Application Fees
For tenants in competitive rental markets, application fees represent a significant financial burden that extends far beyond the individual fee amount. Consider a typical apartment search scenario in a high-demand market: a prospective tenant applies to five properties at an average fee of $50 each, resulting in $250 in non-refundable expenses regardless of outcome. In states without fee caps, where fees can reach $75-$100 or more in desirable neighborhoods, this cost escalates rapidly to $375-$500 just for applications.
Low-income renters and those with imperfect credit or rental histories—who often need to apply to more properties before finding acceptance—bear the heaviest burden from these fees. Research from the National Consumer Law Center has identified 27 different types of fees that can arise during tenancy, including application fees, screening fees, administrative fees, processing fees, holding deposits, and various “junk fees” that landlords may charge. This proliferation of charges has prompted legislative action in multiple states, with Georgia, Illinois, and Minnesota all passing fee-related legislation in 2024 alone to address these concerns.
🔍 The Disparate Impact of Criminal Background Screening
Criminal background screening in housing has received significant attention due to its documented disparate impact on communities of color. According to the Sentencing Project, Black Americans are incarcerated at nearly five times the rate of white Americans, and Hispanic Americans at approximately 1.3 times the rate. These disparities in the criminal justice system translate directly into disparities in housing access when landlords use criminal history as a screening criterion.
HUD’s 2016 guidance explicitly recognized this disparate impact, noting that blanket bans on applicants with criminal records will almost always have a discriminatory effect on protected classes. The guidance requires landlords to demonstrate that any criminal history policy serves a substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory interest and that no less discriminatory alternative would serve that interest as well. Failure to conduct individualized assessments exposes landlords to significant fair housing liability.
🗺️ Find Your State’s Tenant Screening Laws
Select your state below for comprehensive information on application fees, background check rules, source of income protections, and Fair Housing compliance.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Below are answers to the most common questions landlords and tenants have about tenant screening laws, application fees, background checks, and fair housing compliance. For state-specific guidance, select your state from the grid above.
🔒 Need Professional Tenant Screening?
Get comprehensive background checks, credit reports, and eviction history searches—delivered same-day. FCRA compliant, no monthly fees, applicants or landlords can pay.
Start Screening Now
