Free Lead-Based Paint Disclosure Form
The federal disclosure every landlord must deliver before leasing housing built before 1978 — in all 50 states. Authority is 42 U.S.C. 4852d and 40 CFR Part 745 Subpart F. And the 10-day inspection window you see on other rental forms? That is a sales rule. It is not part of the lease disclosure.
A lead-based paint disclosure is the federally mandated form a landlord delivers to a prospective tenant before any lease of residential property built before 1978. It carries the fixed federal lead warning statement, states the lessor’s actual knowledge of lead-based paint and hazards, lists the records being handed over, documents the tenant’s receipt of the EPA pamphlet Protect Your Family From Lead in Your Home, captures any agent’s acknowledgment, and is signed and dated by every party. Authority is 42 U.S.C. 4852d (Section 1018 of Title X, the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992), implemented at 40 CFR Part 745 Subpart F (EPA) and 24 CFR Part 35 Subpart A (HUD). The duty is federal and uniform — it applies identically in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the territories. It is one of the disclosures that belongs in every pre-1978 tenancy file, alongside the rest of your lease paperwork — see our guide to writing a lease agreement for where it fits. Generate the form below, then read on for exactly what the rule requires and, just as importantly, what it does not.
- Pre-1978 is the only trigger. Original construction before 1 January 1978 makes the unit “target housing” and the disclosure mandatory. The build date controls even if the unit was gutted and rebuilt in 1995.
- The rule is federal and applies in every state. No state law replaces it. A minority of states and cities add duties on top; most add nothing at all.
- The 10-day inspection window does not apply to leases. 42 U.S.C. 4852d(a)(1)(C) and 40 CFR 745.110(a) give it to purchasers only. The lessor rules at 40 CFR 745.113(b) contain no such item. You may offer an inspection voluntarily; you are not required to.
- The regulation lists six elements, not three. 40 CFR 745.113(b) is more demanding than the “three things” summary you will read elsewhere.
- You never have to test. The rule compels disclosure of actual knowledge, not investigation. “No knowledge” is honest and lawful when nothing has been tested and you hold no reports.
- Deliver before the tenant is obligated, not at move-in and not with the keys. Late delivery is the same violation as no delivery.
- Retain the signed disclosure three years from the start of the leasing period (40 CFR 745.113(c)). It is your only real defence in an enforcement inquiry.
- Renovation is a second, separate duty. Disturbing paint in an occupied pre-1978 unit triggers the RRP rule and a 60-day lead-hazard-information notice.
Federal lead paint disclosure overview
Federal Lead Paint Disclosure at a Glance
Trigger
Built before 1978
Authority
42 U.S.C. 4852d
Applies In
All 50 states
Retention
3 years
Timing
Before lease obligation
Pamphlet
EPA, mandatory
Duty to test
No
10-day inspection
Sales only
What the lead-based paint disclosure does
The lead paint disclosure — often called the Section 1018 disclosure, after the 1992 statute that created it — is the formal federal notice a landlord delivers to a prospective tenant for any residential property built before 1978. It does four things in one document.
First, it puts the tenant on notice of potential lead exposure through the federally mandated lead warning statement, the fixed language at 40 CFR 745.113(b)(1) that must be attached to or included within the lease.
Second, it transmits the lessor’s actual knowledge of lead-based paint or hazards in the dwelling. The lessor picks one of exactly two positions: known lead-based paint or hazards are present, with a description of what is known; or the lessor has no knowledge of lead-based paint or hazards in the housing. There is no third box, and there is no “maybe”.
Third, it transmits any reports the lessor holds from prior inspections, risk assessments, or hazard-reduction work. The lessor either provides copies of all available records and lists them, or affirmatively states that no reports or records exist.
Fourth, it documents the tenant’s receipt of the disclosure and of the EPA pamphlet. The signed acknowledgment is the landlord’s primary defence in any later EPA or HUD inquiry or private civil action.
The disclosure is not optional and the duty is not waivable by agreement. A pre-1978 rental leased without one exposes the landlord to government civil penalties and to a tenant’s private action for triple damages plus fees. Compliance takes fifteen minutes; non-compliance is the most expensive paperwork failure in pre-1978 rental practice.
Do landlords have to give tenants 10 days to inspect for lead?
No. The 10-day risk assessment or inspection opportunity is a sales requirement. It does not apply to leases. This is the single most consequential error circulating on lead-disclosure forms, and it is worth reading the actual text rather than trusting any summary — including ours.
Read the statute. 42 U.S.C. 4852d(a)(1)(C) requires the regulations to ensure that, before a purchaser or lessee is obligated, the seller or lessor does certain things — and subparagraph (C) specifically directs that the seller “permit the purchaser a 10-day period (unless the parties mutually agree upon a different period of time) to conduct a risk assessment or inspection”. The 10-day opportunity is granted to the purchaser. Lessees get the disclosure duties; they do not get an inspection period.
Read the regulation. 40 CFR 745.110(a) provides, verbatim: “Before a purchaser is obligated under any contract to purchase target housing, the seller shall permit the purchaser a 10-day period (unless the parties mutually agree, in writing, upon a different period of time) to conduct a risk assessment or inspection for the presence of lead-based paint and/or lead-based paint hazards.” Purchaser. Purchase. Seller. Every operative noun in that sentence is a sales noun. There is no lessee, lessor, or lease anywhere in it.
Now read the lessor rules. 40 CFR 745.113(b) — the six elements set out in the next section — contains no inspection-opportunity item whatsoever. It requires a warning statement, a knowledge disclosure, a records list, a lessee acknowledgment, an agent statement, and signatures. That is the complete list. Neither does the EPA lessor disclosure form include one. EPA’s own guidance consistently describes the duty as providing homebuyers a 10-day period, and EPA states separately that the Disclosure Rule does not require landlords to conduct or pay for inspections.
Where the error comes from — the item is real, just on the other form
The 10-day item is not invented out of nothing. It genuinely exists at 40 CFR 745.113(a)(5), which is the sales disclosure provision. That subsection requires a statement that the purchaser “[r]eceived the opportunity to conduct the risk assessment or inspection required by § 745.110(a)” or “[w]aived the opportunity.” So there is a legitimate received-or-waived line — on the seller’s form. Form vendors build one template, copy it to make the lessor version, and forget to delete the item that has no lessor counterpart. That is how a sales-only line ends up on a rental disclosure, and it is why so many landlords believe a duty exists that Congress never imposed on them.
What this means for you. A landlord owes a prospective tenant no statutory inspection window. You may offer one voluntarily. If a prospective tenant with a young child asks for time to have the unit assessed, allowing it is a reasonable and often sensible gesture — but it is optional best practice, not law. Describe it that way in your own paperwork, and never as a federal right.
Why the checkbox is worse than saying nothing
Some rental forms print a line reading “Tenant was offered the 10-day opportunity to inspect” and “Tenant waived the inspection.” Consider what that does. Element
